Abstract
Classifiers are biased when trained on biased datasets. As a remedy, we propose Learning to Split (ls), an algorithm for automatic bias detection. Given a dataset with input-label pairs, ls learns to split this dataset so that predictors trained on the training split generalize poorly to the testing split. This performance gap provides a proxy for measuring the degree of bias in the learned features and can therefore be used to reduce biases. Identifying non-generalizable splits is challenging as we don't have any explicit annotations about how to split. In this work, we show that the prediction correctness of the testing example can be used as a source of weak supervision: generalization performance will drop if we move examples that are predicted correctly away from the testing split, leaving only those that are mispredicted. We evaluate our approach on Beer Review, Waterbirds, CelebA and MNLI. Empirical results show that ls is able to generate astonishingly challenging splits that correlate with human-identified biases. Moreover, we demonstrate that combining robust learning algorithms (such as group DRO) with splits identified by ls enables automatic de-biasing. Compared with previous state-of-the-arts, we substantially improves the worst-group performance (23.4% on average) when the source of biases is unknown during training and validation.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2204.13749
