Abstract
Legal judgment Prediction (LJP), aiming to predict a judgment based on fact descriptions, serves as legal assistance to mitigate the great work burden of limited legal practitioners. Most existing methods apply various large-scale pre-trained language models (PLMs) finetuned in LJP tasks to obtain consistent improvements. However, we discover the fact that the state-of-the-art (SOTA) model makes judgment predictions according to wrong (or non-casual) information, which not only weakens the model's generalization capability but also results in severe social problems like discrimination. Here, we analyze the causal mechanism misleading the LJP model to learn the spurious correlations, and then propose a framework to guide the model to learn the underlying causality knowledge in the legal texts. Specifically, we first perform open information extraction (OIE) to refine the text having a high proportion of causal information, according to which we generate a new set of data. Then, we design a model learning the weights of the refined data and the raw data for LJP model training. The extensive experimental results show that our model is more generalizable and robust than the baselines and achieves a new SOTA performance on two commonly used legal-specific datasets.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.03046
