Paper Reading AI Learner

Identification of Predictive Sub-Phenotypes of Acute Kidney Injury using Structured and Unstructured Electronic Health Record Data with Memory Networks

2019-04-10 03:22:34
Zhenxing Xu, Jingyuan Chou, Xi Sheryl Zhang, Yuan Luo, Tamara Isakova, Prakash Adekkanattu, Jessica S. Ancker, Guoqian Jiang, Richard C. Kiefer, Jennifer A. Pacheco, Luke V. Rasmussen, Jyotishman Pathak, Fei Wang

Abstract

Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) is a common clinical syndrome characterized by the rapid loss of kidney excretory function, which aggravates the clinical severity of other diseases in a large number of hospitalized patients. Accurate early prediction of AKI can enable in-time interventions and treatments. However, AKI is highly heterogeneous, thus identification of AKI sub-phenotypes can lead to an improved understanding of the disease pathophysiology and development of more targeted clinical interventions. This study used a memory network-based deep learning approach to discover predictive AKI sub-phenotypes using structured and unstructured electronic health record (EHR) data of patients before AKI diagnosis. We leveraged a real world critical care EHR corpus including 37,486 ICU stays. Our approach identified three distinct sub-phenotypes: sub-phenotype I is with an average age of 63.03$ \pm 17.25 $ years, and is characterized by mild loss of kidney excretory function (Serum Creatinne (SCr) $1.55\pm 0.34$ mg/dL, estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Test (eGFR) $107.65\pm 54.98$ mL/min/1.73$m^2$). These patients are more likely to develop stage I AKI. Sub-phenotype II is with average age 66.81$ \pm 10.43 $ years, and was characterized by severe loss of kidney excretory function (SCr $1.96\pm 0.49$ mg/dL, eGFR $82.19\pm 55.92$ mL/min/1.73$m^2$). These patients are more likely to develop stage III AKI. Sub-phenotype III is with average age 65.07$ \pm 11.32 $ years, and was characterized moderate loss of kidney excretory function and thus more likely to develop stage II AKI (SCr $1.69\pm 0.32$ mg/dL, eGFR $93.97\pm 56.53$ mL/min/1.73$m^2$). Both SCr and eGFR are significantly different across the three sub-phenotypes with statistical testing plus postdoc analysis, and the conclusion still holds after age adjustment.

Abstract (translated)

急性肾损伤(AKI)是一种常见的临床综合征,其特点是肾排泄功能迅速丧失,加重了大量住院患者其他疾病的临床严重程度。准确的早期AKI预测可以及时进行干预和治疗。然而,AKI具有高度的异质性,因此,对AKI亚型的鉴定可以提高对疾病病理生理学的理解,并发展更具针对性的临床干预措施。本研究采用基于记忆网络的深度学习方法,利用AKI诊断前患者的结构化和非结构化电子健康记录(ehr)数据发现预测性AKI亚型。我们利用了一个现实世界的紧急护理EHR语料库,包括37486个ICU住院。我们的方法确定了三个不同的亚表型:亚表型I的平均年龄为63.03美元 PM 17.25美元年,其特点是轻度肾排泄功能丧失(Serum Creatinne(SCR)1.55美元 PM 0.34美元mg/dL,估计肾小球滤过率试验(EGFR)107.65美元/PM 54.98美元/分钟/ 1.73美元M^ 2美元)。这些患者更可能发展为I期AKI。亚型II平均年龄66.81$pm 10.43$岁,其特征是肾排泄功能严重丧失(scr$1.96pm 0.49$mg/dl,egfr$82.19pm 55.92$ml/min/1.73$m^2$)。这些患者更有可能发生第三阶段AKI。亚型III平均年龄65.07$pm 11.32$岁,表现为肾排泄功能中度丧失,因此更可能发展为II期AKI(scr$1.69pm 0.32$mg/dl,egfr$93.97pm 56.53$ml/min/1.73$m^2$)。三种亚型的scr和egfr在统计学检验和博士后分析上均存在显著差异,年龄调整后的结论仍然有效。

URL

https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.04990

PDF

https://arxiv.org/pdf/1904.04990.pdf


Tags
3D Action Action_Localization Action_Recognition Activity Adversarial Agent Attention Autonomous Bert Boundary_Detection Caption Chat Classification CNN Compressive_Sensing Contour Contrastive_Learning Deep_Learning Denoising Detection Dialog Diffusion Drone Dynamic_Memory_Network Edge_Detection Embedding Embodied Emotion Enhancement Face Face_Detection Face_Recognition Facial_Landmark Few-Shot Gait_Recognition GAN Gaze_Estimation Gesture Gradient_Descent Handwriting Human_Parsing Image_Caption Image_Classification Image_Compression Image_Enhancement Image_Generation Image_Matting Image_Retrieval Inference Inpainting Intelligent_Chip Knowledge Knowledge_Graph Language_Model Matching Medical Memory_Networks Multi_Modal Multi_Task NAS NMT Object_Detection Object_Tracking OCR Ontology Optical_Character Optical_Flow Optimization Person_Re-identification Point_Cloud Portrait_Generation Pose Pose_Estimation Prediction QA Quantitative Quantitative_Finance Quantization Re-identification Recognition Recommendation Reconstruction Regularization Reinforcement_Learning Relation Relation_Extraction Represenation Represenation_Learning Restoration Review RNN Salient Scene_Classification Scene_Generation Scene_Parsing Scene_Text Segmentation Self-Supervised Semantic_Instance_Segmentation Semantic_Segmentation Semi_Global Semi_Supervised Sence_graph Sentiment Sentiment_Classification Sketch SLAM Sparse Speech Speech_Recognition Style_Transfer Summarization Super_Resolution Surveillance Survey Text_Classification Text_Generation Tracking Transfer_Learning Transformer Unsupervised Video_Caption Video_Classification Video_Indexing Video_Prediction Video_Retrieval Visual_Relation VQA Weakly_Supervised Zero-Shot