Abstract
Self-supervision is a powerful technique for learning visual representations from unlabeled data. Existing techniques primarily adopt a two-stage approach for self-supervised learning (SSL): a pretraining stage on unlabeled data followed by a finetuning stage on labeled data. While this pipeline has demonstrated extreme effectiveness, the interaction between self-supervised and supervised learning objectives remains insufficiently understood. In this work, we systematically investigate whether jointly optimizing the self-supervised and supervised objectives during training provides a better alternative. We compare two training paradigms: (1) the aforementioned pretraining followed by finetuning (PFT) and (2) joint training (JT), where self-supervised and supervised losses are optimized simultaneously in the same network. Across eight representative SSL methods and diverse computer vision tasks on natural, medical, crisis response, and remote sensing data, we evaluate performance under varying percentages of labeled data. Our results reveal that the relative effectiveness of PFT and JT depends strongly on the task at hand, the availability of labeled data, and the complexity of the domain. We find that JT consistently improves data and training efficiency while being robust in low-label settings, while PFT is more reliable in more specialized domains. We further analyze representation quality, robustness, and cross-domain generalization, providing new insights into how self-supervised and supervised objectives interact during optimization. We establish a comprehensive empirical benchmark for hybrid SSL-based semi-supervised learning and offer practical guidance for selecting appropriate training strategies across diverse vision applications.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.13192
