Paper Reading AI Learner

A Device and Method to Identify Hip, Knee and Ankle Joint Impedance During Walking

2021-12-10 14:22:54
Herman van der Kooij, Simone S.Fricke, Ronald C. van 't Veld, Ander Vallinas Prieto, Arvid Q.L. Keemink, Alfred C. Schouten, Edwin H.F. van Asseldonk

Abstract

Knowledge on joint impedance during walking in various conditions is relevant for clinical decision making and the development of robotic gait trainers, leg prostheses, leg orthotics, and wearable exoskeletons. Whereas ankle impedance during walking has been experimentally assessed, knee and hip joint impedance during walking have not been identified yet. Here we developed and evaluated a lower limb perturbator to identify hip, knee and ankle joint impedance during treadmill walking. The lower limb perturbator (LOPER) consists of an actuator connected to the thigh via rods. The LOPER allows to apply force perturbations to a free-hanging leg, while standing on the contralateral leg, with a bandwidth of up to 39Hz. While walking in minimal impedance mode, the interaction forces between LOPER and the thigh were low (<5N) and the effect on the walking pattern was smaller than the within-subject variability during normal walking. Using a non-linear multibody dynamical model of swing leg dynamics, the hip, knee and ankle joint impedance were estimated at three time points during the swing phase for nine subjects walking at a speed of 0.5 m/s. The identified model was well able to predict the experimental responses, since the mean variance accounted for was 99%, 96%, and 77%, for the hip, knee and ankle respectively. The averaged across subjects stiffness varied between the three time point within 34-66 Nm/rad, 0-3.5 Nm/rad, and 2.5-24 Nm/rad for the hip, knee and ankle joint respectively. The damping varied between 1.9-4.6 Nms/rad, 0.02-0.14 Nms/rad, and 0.2-2.4 Nms/rad for hip, knee, and ankle respectively. The developed LOPER has a negligible effect on the unperturbed walking pattern and allows to identify hip, knee and ankle joint impedance during the swing phase.

Abstract (translated)

URL

https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.05564

PDF

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2112.05564.pdf


Tags
3D Action Action_Localization Action_Recognition Activity Adversarial Agent Attention Autonomous Bert Boundary_Detection Caption Chat Classification CNN Compressive_Sensing Contour Contrastive_Learning Deep_Learning Denoising Detection Dialog Diffusion Drone Dynamic_Memory_Network Edge_Detection Embedding Embodied Emotion Enhancement Face Face_Detection Face_Recognition Facial_Landmark Few-Shot Gait_Recognition GAN Gaze_Estimation Gesture Gradient_Descent Handwriting Human_Parsing Image_Caption Image_Classification Image_Compression Image_Enhancement Image_Generation Image_Matting Image_Retrieval Inference Inpainting Intelligent_Chip Knowledge Knowledge_Graph Language_Model Matching Medical Memory_Networks Multi_Modal Multi_Task NAS NMT Object_Detection Object_Tracking OCR Ontology Optical_Character Optical_Flow Optimization Person_Re-identification Point_Cloud Portrait_Generation Pose Pose_Estimation Prediction QA Quantitative Quantitative_Finance Quantization Re-identification Recognition Recommendation Reconstruction Regularization Reinforcement_Learning Relation Relation_Extraction Represenation Represenation_Learning Restoration Review RNN Salient Scene_Classification Scene_Generation Scene_Parsing Scene_Text Segmentation Self-Supervised Semantic_Instance_Segmentation Semantic_Segmentation Semi_Global Semi_Supervised Sence_graph Sentiment Sentiment_Classification Sketch SLAM Sparse Speech Speech_Recognition Style_Transfer Summarization Super_Resolution Surveillance Survey Text_Classification Text_Generation Tracking Transfer_Learning Transformer Unsupervised Video_Caption Video_Classification Video_Indexing Video_Prediction Video_Retrieval Visual_Relation VQA Weakly_Supervised Zero-Shot