Paper Reading AI Learner

Synthetic PET via Domain Translation of 3D MRI

2022-06-11 21:32:40
Abhejit Rajagopal, Yutaka Natsuaki, Kristen Wangerin, Mahdjoub Hamdi, Hongyu An, John J. Sunderland, Richard Laforest, Paul E. Kinahan, Peder E.Z. Larson, Thomas A.Hope

Abstract

Historically, patient datasets have been used to develop and validate various reconstruction algorithms for PET/MRI and PET/CT. To enable such algorithm development, without the need for acquiring hundreds of patient exams, in this paper we demonstrate a deep learning technique to generate synthetic but realistic whole-body PET sinograms from abundantly-available whole-body MRI. Specifically, we use a dataset of 56 $^{18}$F-FDG-PET/MRI exams to train a 3D residual UNet to predict physiologic PET uptake from whole-body T1-weighted MRI. In training we implemented a balanced loss function to generate realistic uptake across a large dynamic range and computed losses along tomographic lines of response to mimic the PET acquisition. The predicted PET images are forward projected to produce synthetic PET time-of-flight (ToF) sinograms that can be used with vendor-provided PET reconstruction algorithms, including using CT-based attenuation correction (CTAC) and MR-based attenuation correction (MRAC). The resulting synthetic data recapitulates physiologic $^{18}$F-FDG uptake, e.g. high uptake localized to the brain and bladder, as well as uptake in liver, kidneys, heart and muscle. To simulate abnormalities with high uptake, we also insert synthetic lesions. We demonstrate that this synthetic PET data can be used interchangeably with real PET data for the PET quantification task of comparing CT and MR-based attenuation correction methods, achieving $\leq 7.6\%$ error in mean-SUV compared to using real data. These results together show that the proposed synthetic PET data pipeline can be reasonably used for development, evaluation, and validation of PET/MRI reconstruction methods.

Abstract (translated)

URL

https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.05618

PDF

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2206.05618.pdf


Tags
3D Action Action_Localization Action_Recognition Activity Adversarial Agent Attention Autonomous Bert Boundary_Detection Caption Chat Classification CNN Compressive_Sensing Contour Contrastive_Learning Deep_Learning Denoising Detection Dialog Diffusion Drone Dynamic_Memory_Network Edge_Detection Embedding Embodied Emotion Enhancement Face Face_Detection Face_Recognition Facial_Landmark Few-Shot Gait_Recognition GAN Gaze_Estimation Gesture Gradient_Descent Handwriting Human_Parsing Image_Caption Image_Classification Image_Compression Image_Enhancement Image_Generation Image_Matting Image_Retrieval Inference Inpainting Intelligent_Chip Knowledge Knowledge_Graph Language_Model Matching Medical Memory_Networks Multi_Modal Multi_Task NAS NMT Object_Detection Object_Tracking OCR Ontology Optical_Character Optical_Flow Optimization Person_Re-identification Point_Cloud Portrait_Generation Pose Pose_Estimation Prediction QA Quantitative Quantitative_Finance Quantization Re-identification Recognition Recommendation Reconstruction Regularization Reinforcement_Learning Relation Relation_Extraction Represenation Represenation_Learning Restoration Review RNN Salient Scene_Classification Scene_Generation Scene_Parsing Scene_Text Segmentation Self-Supervised Semantic_Instance_Segmentation Semantic_Segmentation Semi_Global Semi_Supervised Sence_graph Sentiment Sentiment_Classification Sketch SLAM Sparse Speech Speech_Recognition Style_Transfer Summarization Super_Resolution Surveillance Survey Text_Classification Text_Generation Tracking Transfer_Learning Transformer Unsupervised Video_Caption Video_Classification Video_Indexing Video_Prediction Video_Retrieval Visual_Relation VQA Weakly_Supervised Zero-Shot