Abstract
The recent advances in continual (incremental or lifelong) learning have concentrated on the prevention of forgetting that can lead to catastrophic consequences, but there are two outstanding challenges that must be addressed. The first is the evaluation of the robustness of the proposed methods. The second is ensuring the security of learned tasks remains largely unexplored. This paper presents a comprehensive study of the susceptibility of the continually learned tasks (including both current and previously learned tasks) that are vulnerable to forgetting. Such vulnerability of tasks against adversarial attacks raises profound issues in data integrity and privacy. We consider the task incremental learning (Task-IL) scenario and explore three regularization-based experiments, three replay-based experiments, and one hybrid technique based on the reply and exemplar approach. We examine the robustness of these methods. In particular, we consider cases where we demonstrate that any class belonging to the current or previously learned tasks is prone to misclassification. Our observations highlight the potential limitations of existing Task-IL approaches. Our empirical study recommends that the research community consider the robustness of the proposed continual learning approaches and invest extensive efforts in mitigating catastrophic forgetting.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.05225
