Abstract
Weakly supervised pipelines for medical imaging have become increasingly popular over the years. These systems often include multiple stages and components, such as reconstruction, generation, and localization, yet standard evaluation metrics provide limited insight into whether clinically relevant information is preserved across each stage. We present the diagnostic gap framework, a practical evaluation tool that measures decision preservation and explanation preservation as a function of measured reconstruction fidelity. To isolate the effect of reconstruction from localization, we evaluate on curated lesion ROI crops using a fidelity ladder of three class-conditional reconstructors---VQ-VAE-GAN, VAE-GAN, and diffusion (SDEdit)---spanning a twenty-fold range in perceptual distance (LPIPS 0.029--0.584). At autoencoder fidelity, both decision and explanation are preserved: AUC changes remain within $\pm$0.005 and attribution similarity (HiResCAM, Grad-CAM++) stays high. At diffusion fidelity, both collapse: pooled AUC drops by 0.253 and mass-pathology AUC falls below chance. The diagnostic gap is thus a measurable function of reconstruction fidelity rather than an intrinsic cost of reconstruction, and the framework provides an architecture-agnostic instrument for identifying when and where multi-stage pipelines lose diagnostic signal.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.22740
