Abstract
In recent years, a number of approaches based on 2D CNNs and 3D CNNs have emerged for video action recognition, achieving state-of-the-art results on several large-scale benchmark datasets. In this paper, we carry out an in-depth comparative analysis to better understand the differences between these approaches and the progress made by them. To this end, we develop a unified framework for both 2D-CNN and 3D-CNN action models, which enables us to remove bells and whistles and provides a common ground for a fair comparison. We then conduct an effort towards a large-scale analysis involving over 300 action recognition models. Our comprehensive analysis reveals that a) a significant leap is made in efficiency for action recognition, but not in accuracy; b) 2D-CNN and 3D-CNN models behave similarly in terms of spatio-temporal representation abilities and transferability. Our analysis also shows that recent action models seem to be able to learn data-dependent temporality flexibly as needed. Our codes and models are available on \url{this https URL}.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.11757
