Abstract
Continual labeling of training examples is a costly task in supervised learning. Active learning strategies mitigate this cost by identifying unlabeled data that are considered the most useful for training a predictive model. However, sample selection via active learning may lead to an exploitation-exploration dilemma. In online settings, profitable items can be neglected when uncertain items are annotated instead. To illustrate this dilemma, we study a human-in-the-loop customs selection scenario where an AI-based system supports customs officers by providing a set of imports to be inspected. If the inspected items are fraud, officers levy extra duties, and these items will be used as additional training data for the next iterations. Inspecting highly suspicious items will inevitably lead to additional customs revenue, yet they may not give any extra knowledge to customs officers. On the other hand, inspecting uncertain items will help customs officers to acquire new knowledge, which will be used as supplementary training resources to update their selection systems. Through years of customs selection simulation, we show that some exploration is needed to cope with the domain shift, and our hybrid strategy of selecting fraud and uncertain items will eventually outperform the performance of the exploitation strategy.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.14282
