Paper Reading AI Learner

Quantization Backdoors to Deep Learning Models

2021-08-20 14:08:23
Hua Ma, Huming Qiu, Yansong Gao, Zhi Zhang, Alsharif Abuadbba, Anmin Fu, Said Al-Sarawi, Derek Abbott

Abstract

There is currently a burgeoning demand for deploying deep learning (DL) models on ubiquitous edge Internet of Things devices attributing to their low latency and high privacy preservation. However, DL models are often large in size and require large-scale computation, which prevents them from being placed directly onto IoT devices where resources are constrained and 32-bit floating-point operations are unavailable. Model quantization is a pragmatic solution, which enables DL deployment on mobile devices and embedded systems by effortlessly post-quantizing a large high-precision model into a small low-precision model while retaining the model inference accuracy. This work reveals that the standard quantization operation can be abused to activate a backdoor. We demonstrate that a full-precision backdoored model that does not have any backdoor effect in the presence of a trigger -- as the backdoor is dormant -- can be activated by the default TensorFlow-Lite quantization, the only product-ready quantization framework to date. We ascertain that all trained float-32 backdoored models exhibit no backdoor effect even in the presence of trigger inputs. State-of-the-art frontend detection approaches, such as Neural Cleanse and STRIP, fail to identify the backdoor in the float-32 models. When each of the float-32 models is converted into an int-8 format model through the standard TFLite post-training quantization, the backdoor is activated in the quantized model, which shows a stable attack success rate close to 100% upon inputs with the trigger, while behaves normally upon non-trigger inputs. This work highlights that a stealthy security threat occurs when end users utilize the on-device post-training model quantization toolkits, informing security researchers of cross-platform overhaul of DL models post quantization even if they pass frontend inspections.

Abstract (translated)

URL

https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.09187

PDF

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2108.09187.pdf


Tags
3D Action Action_Localization Action_Recognition Activity Adversarial Agent Attention Autonomous Bert Boundary_Detection Caption Chat Classification CNN Compressive_Sensing Contour Contrastive_Learning Deep_Learning Denoising Detection Dialog Diffusion Drone Dynamic_Memory_Network Edge_Detection Embedding Embodied Emotion Enhancement Face Face_Detection Face_Recognition Facial_Landmark Few-Shot Gait_Recognition GAN Gaze_Estimation Gesture Gradient_Descent Handwriting Human_Parsing Image_Caption Image_Classification Image_Compression Image_Enhancement Image_Generation Image_Matting Image_Retrieval Inference Inpainting Intelligent_Chip Knowledge Knowledge_Graph Language_Model Matching Medical Memory_Networks Multi_Modal Multi_Task NAS NMT Object_Detection Object_Tracking OCR Ontology Optical_Character Optical_Flow Optimization Person_Re-identification Point_Cloud Portrait_Generation Pose Pose_Estimation Prediction QA Quantitative Quantitative_Finance Quantization Re-identification Recognition Recommendation Reconstruction Regularization Reinforcement_Learning Relation Relation_Extraction Represenation Represenation_Learning Restoration Review RNN Salient Scene_Classification Scene_Generation Scene_Parsing Scene_Text Segmentation Self-Supervised Semantic_Instance_Segmentation Semantic_Segmentation Semi_Global Semi_Supervised Sence_graph Sentiment Sentiment_Classification Sketch SLAM Sparse Speech Speech_Recognition Style_Transfer Summarization Super_Resolution Surveillance Survey Text_Classification Text_Generation Tracking Transfer_Learning Transformer Unsupervised Video_Caption Video_Classification Video_Indexing Video_Prediction Video_Retrieval Visual_Relation VQA Weakly_Supervised Zero-Shot