Abstract
Despite impressive state-of-the-art performance on a wide variety of machine learning tasks in multiple applications, deep learning methods can produce over-confident predictions, particularly with limited training data. Therefore, quantifying uncertainty is particularly important in critical applications such as anomaly or lesion detection and clinical diagnosis, where a realistic assessment of uncertainty is essential in determining surgical margins, disease status and appropriate treatment. In this work, we focus on using quantile regression to estimate aleatoric uncertainty and use it for estimating uncertainty in both supervised and unsupervised lesion detection problems. In the unsupervised settings, we apply quantile regression to a lesion detection task using Variational AutoEncoder (VAE). The VAE models the output as a conditionally independent Gaussian characterized by means and variances for each output dimension. Unfortunately, joint optimization of both mean and variance in the VAE leads to the well-known problem of shrinkage or underestimation of variance. We describe an alternative VAE model, Quantile-Regression VAE (QR-VAE), that avoids this variance shrinkage problem by estimating conditional quantiles for the given input image. Using the estimated quantiles, we compute the conditional mean and variance for input images under the conditionally Gaussian model. We then compute reconstruction probability using this model as a principled approach to outlier or anomaly detection applications. In the supervised setting, we develop binary quantile regression (BQR) for the supervised lesion segmentation task. BQR segmentation can capture uncertainty in label boundaries. We show how quantile regression can be used to characterize expert disagreement in the location of lesion boundaries.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.09374
