Abstract
Recent research suggests that neural machine translation (MT) in the news domain has reached human-level performance, but for other professional domains, it is far below the level. In this paper, we conduct a fine-grained systematic human evaluation for four widely used Chinese-English NMT systems on scientific abstracts which are collected from published journals and books. Our human evaluation results show that all the systems return with more than 10\% error rates on average, which requires much post editing effort for real academic use. Furthermore, we categorize six main error types and and provide some real examples. Our findings emphasise the needs that research attention in the MT community should be shifted from short text generic translation to professional machine translation and build large scale bilingual corpus for these specific domains.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.14766
