Paper Reading AI Learner

How Robust is Google's Bard to Adversarial Image Attacks?

2023-09-21 03:24:30
Yinpeng Dong, Huanran Chen, Jiawei Chen, Zhengwei Fang, Xiao Yang, Yichi Zhang, Yu Tian, Hang Su, Jun Zhu

Abstract

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) that integrate text and other modalities (especially vision) have achieved unprecedented performance in various multimodal tasks. However, due to the unsolved adversarial robustness problem of vision models, MLLMs can have more severe safety and security risks by introducing the vision inputs. In this work, we study the adversarial robustness of Google's Bard, a competitive chatbot to ChatGPT that released its multimodal capability recently, to better understand the vulnerabilities of commercial MLLMs. By attacking white-box surrogate vision encoders or MLLMs, the generated adversarial examples can mislead Bard to output wrong image descriptions with a 22% success rate based solely on the transferability. We show that the adversarial examples can also attack other MLLMs, e.g., a 26% attack success rate against Bing Chat and a 86% attack success rate against ERNIE bot. Moreover, we identify two defense mechanisms of Bard, including face detection and toxicity detection of images. We design corresponding attacks to evade these defenses, demonstrating that the current defenses of Bard are also vulnerable. We hope this work can deepen our understanding on the robustness of MLLMs and facilitate future research on defenses. Our code is available at this https URL.

Abstract (translated)

综合文本和其他modality(特别是视觉)的大型语言模型(MLLM),在多种modal任务中取得了前所未有的表现。然而,由于视觉模型未能解决的攻击鲁棒性问题,引入视觉输入可能会带来更加严重的安全和安全风险。在这项工作中,我们研究了Google的Bard(最近发布的 multimodal能力竞争的聊天机器人ChatGPT)的攻击鲁棒性,以更好地理解商业MLLM的漏洞。通过攻击白盒视觉编码器或MLLM,生成的dversarial examples可以误导Bard输出错误的图像描述,仅通过转移性成功率为22%。我们证明,dversarial examples也可以攻击其他MLLM,例如,对 Bing Chat 的攻击成功率为26%,对ERNIE机器人的攻击成功率为86%。此外,我们识别了 Bard 的两个防御机制,包括图像面部检测和毒性检测。我们设计相应的攻击来规避这些防御,表明 Bard 当前防御机制也薄弱环节。我们希望这项工作可以加深我们对MLLM的鲁棒性的理解,并促进未来的防御研究。我们的代码在这个httpsURL上可用。

URL

https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.11751

PDF

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2309.11751.pdf


Tags
3D Action Action_Localization Action_Recognition Activity Adversarial Agent Attention Autonomous Bert Boundary_Detection Caption Chat Classification CNN Compressive_Sensing Contour Contrastive_Learning Deep_Learning Denoising Detection Dialog Diffusion Drone Dynamic_Memory_Network Edge_Detection Embedding Embodied Emotion Enhancement Face Face_Detection Face_Recognition Facial_Landmark Few-Shot Gait_Recognition GAN Gaze_Estimation Gesture Gradient_Descent Handwriting Human_Parsing Image_Caption Image_Classification Image_Compression Image_Enhancement Image_Generation Image_Matting Image_Retrieval Inference Inpainting Intelligent_Chip Knowledge Knowledge_Graph Language_Model LLM Matching Medical Memory_Networks Multi_Modal Multi_Task NAS NMT Object_Detection Object_Tracking OCR Ontology Optical_Character Optical_Flow Optimization Person_Re-identification Point_Cloud Portrait_Generation Pose Pose_Estimation Prediction QA Quantitative Quantitative_Finance Quantization Re-identification Recognition Recommendation Reconstruction Regularization Reinforcement_Learning Relation Relation_Extraction Represenation Represenation_Learning Restoration Review RNN Robot Salient Scene_Classification Scene_Generation Scene_Parsing Scene_Text Segmentation Self-Supervised Semantic_Instance_Segmentation Semantic_Segmentation Semi_Global Semi_Supervised Sence_graph Sentiment Sentiment_Classification Sketch SLAM Sparse Speech Speech_Recognition Style_Transfer Summarization Super_Resolution Surveillance Survey Text_Classification Text_Generation Tracking Transfer_Learning Transformer Unsupervised Video_Caption Video_Classification Video_Indexing Video_Prediction Video_Retrieval Visual_Relation VQA Weakly_Supervised Zero-Shot