Purpose : To develop and evaluate CAPTOR, a deep-learning vision-language foundation model for oncologic chest-abdomen-pelvis (CAP) CT interpretation. Materials & Methods : CAPTOR (Chest-Abdomen-Pelvis foundaTion model for Oncologic Radiology) is a contrastive vision-language model, trained using a pretraining strategy for oncologic CAP CT (in single- or multiple-series acquisitions), on a multicenter retrospective dataset from North America, Europe and Asia, predominantly from tumor lesion examinations. CAPTOR was compared with state-of-the-art CT foundation models on three downstream tasks: disease detection, survival prediction using TumorImagingBench and image retrieval. Classification and retrieval were both evaluated on held-out internal and public test sets, stratified by anatomical coverage and indication. Bootstrap resampling was used to estimate confidence intervals, and pairwise comparisons were performed using permutation tests. Results : CAPTOR was trained and tested on 25,512 and 10,794 CT-report pairs respectively. TumorImagingBench datasets comprised between 134 and 421 studies each. CAPTOR outperformed all baseline models, on the classification task, on the CAP subset (AUC 0.767, 95%CI: 0.734-0.793, vs. 0.695, 95%CI: 0.645-0.736 for the next-best, p<0.001) and oncologic subset (AUC 0.784, 95%CI: 0.759-0.805, vs. 0.734, 95%CI: 0.703-0.767 p<0.001), ranked first on three of the four oncologic prognostic benchmarks, and achieved superior retrieval performance on CAP and oncologic subsets. Conclusion : A foundation model trained on oncology-enriched CAP CT data outperformed relevant state-of-the-art models in its target clinical context, underscoring the importance of clinically aligned pretraining. We release our preprocessing, training and inference code : this https URL and model weights : this https URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.14226
Image retrieval methods often rely on a single global semantic descriptor extracted from an image, e.g., the [CLS] token in vision transformers. However, trying to squeeze all the semantic information of an image into a single descriptor can hurt downstream retrieval performance, especially for fine-grained retrieval tasks. In this work, we augment the semantic tokens in the newer visual transformers, the global [CLS] token and the four register tokens, with a carefully selected collection of spatial tokens, aiming to capture the spatial region representation that characterizes the contents captured in each of the semantic tokens. We leverage the DINOv2-reg model, which includes register tokens that emergently learn object and part-based representations. For each "cue" token ([CLS] and each register token), we find a "buddy" image patch token and extract an N x N patch region to produce a set of localized ROI tokens. Our approach automatically captures important regions of interest without any external bounding boxes or saliency modules, purely by matching semantic tokens with their spatial representation regions. Furthermore, we incorporate these tokens into a multi-vector retrieval framework inspired by ColBERT, enabling fine-grained matching via a per-token alignment mechanism while avoiding the large storage cost of keeping all patch embeddings. Through extensive experiments, we find that (1) register tokens encode useful fine-grained details that can complement the [CLS] token; (2) automatically pooled ROI tokens further improve fine-grained discrimination; and (3) multi-vector retrieval with a small set of tokens improves over a DINOv2-reg single-vector baseline while remaining tractable for large-scale search. The code is available at this https URL.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.10991
Most existing MEG and EEG (M/EEG) visual decoding methods align brain signals with a single global embedding extracted from a pretrained visual encoder, leaving open whether intermediate patch representations, which preserve richer and more granular rich visual information, can improve representation learning. To address this question, we introduce the Residual Patch Adapter (RPA), a lightweight, modular adapter that leverages all patch tokens from an intermediate layer of a ViT visual encoder for alignment. Through extensive ablation analyses, we first show that pooling or masking patch tokens degrades the learned representation, demonstrating that retaining the full set of patch tokens is important for EEG alignment, while the CLS token provides little unique information. We then use a series of six quantitative feature analyses to show that both higher-level semantics and lower-level visual features, including color and texture, are essential for this EEG-to-image alignment. Under current protocols, our system achieves Top-1 accuracies of 95.4\% within-subject and 35.5\% cross-subject on THINGS-EEG2, and 65.2\% and 6.7\%, respectively, on THINGS-MEG, achieving state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance across both datasets. Evaluations with alternative brain encoders, including pretrained EEG foundation models, demonstrate that the approach extends beyond the projection-based EEG encoder. Furthermore, we provide a plug-and-play interface that allows RPA to be replaced by convolution, attention, or ConvNeXt alternatives. Together, these findings provide significant insight into M/EEG-to-image representation learning by establishing design principles for leveraging the latent space of visual encoders, and open new directions for brain--image alignment and non-invasive brain--computer interface (BCI).
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.31698
Cross-view geo-localization is commonly solved as an image retrieval problem, matching a ground-level image against a database of satellite tiles through a jointly trained embedding. Such models are accurate, but they need large paired supervision and cannot show what evidence supports a match. In this paper, we study a different question: how much of this task can be solved through language alone? We prompt a multimodal large language model (MLLM) to describe each ground panorama and each satellite tile as structured text, and localize by comparing these descriptions. No component is trained. We evaluate on 9,826 VIGOR pairs from four U.S. cities, in three settings. First, the descriptions are faithful but not discriminative. They agree closely across the two views, yet ranking the full pool by description similarity almost never returns the correct tile (0.39% Recall@1). Second, we narrow the pool to ten neighboring tiles, as a coarse prior would do. The same descriptions now become useful: an MLLM judge that scores structural consistency doubles random ranking and matches a strong lexical baseline. It also states which fields of the two descriptions agree and which conflict, which an embedding distance cannot do, and which we see as a step toward interpretable localization. Third, we place the judge on a trained visual retriever. On the queries it ranks wrongly, reranking from images works, while reranking from our descriptions does not (23.5% against 10.7% Recall@1). Scene structure survives the conversion into language, while the fine appearance detail needed to separate nearby places does not. Code and prompts are publicly available at this https URL.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.07269
Visual distinctions are often finer than those reflected in linguistic conceptualization. Vision-language models exhibit a similar asymmetry: a distinction can remain discriminable in frozen image geometry while being weakly addressable through the native text interface. We study this gap by separating visual discriminability from linguistic addressability in text-to-image retrieval. Using FactorAtlas, a fully crossed testbed of 23,040 images spanning shape, hue, pattern, and nuisance variation, we compare both readouts on held-out images of the same distinctions. We then derive image-side contrasts that separate each value from its alternatives for matched visual grounding, and test whether this reduces the native-text access gap across factors and models. Direction-specific and visual-absence controls tie these gains to the relevant visual contrast; the gains persist after global alignment and extend to compositional retrieval and natural images. Together, these results show that visual discriminability and linguistic addressability need not coincide, and that matched visual grounding can probe and reduce the resulting access gap.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.37230
Cross-subject EEG-to-image retrieval requires a neural represen- tation trained on source subjects to remain aligned with a visual embedding space for an unseen subject. Whereas existing methods primarily focus on the EEG side, we address this problem from the perspective of the visual target. Our approach preserves the spatial information of the Perception Encoder, converts its patch grid into a compact set of learned visual views, and aggregates them for each image with a block-structured, content-dependent router. The target is learned jointly with the EEG encoder through contrastive learning with MMD regularization across source subjects. For deployment, we propose a training-free representation refinement that aligns frozen embeddings without updating either encoder. Under leave- one-subject-out evaluation on THINGS-EEG2, the structured target achieves 35.3%/65.6% Top-1/Top-5 accuracy, the best among com- pared methods. Refinement raises this to 48.1%/77.1%, an 18.5% Top-1 gain over the strongest compared method, improving all ten held-out subjects.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.36971
Composed image retrieval (CIR) aims to retrieve images that satisfy a user-specified modification while preserving relevant visual content from a reference image. Collecting target images for this purpose is costly, motivating zero-shot CIR methods that instead use target captions as supervision. However, target captions may omit source details that should be preserved. We therefore propose, Preserve-and-Compose Training, which complements target-caption supervision with visual evidence from the source image. PACT learns from image--text--text (ITT) triplets without target images or gallery updates, aligning composed queries with target captions while preserving source evidence through visual supervision. We further introduce Chord scoring, which combines target similarity with source-relative directional agreement in the frozen image space. Results across four ZS-CIR benchmarks show that combining target-caption supervision with source-image evidence leads to strong retrieval performance across datasets, backbone scales, and external galleries. The code is available on this https URL.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.31202
Vision-Language Models (VLMs) are increasingly used for long-document processing, where the inputs combine text with charts, tables, figures, and complex layouts. Deploying them means choosing how to feed the document to the model, which retriever to use when only a subset of pages is sent, and whether to run the model agentically or as a static pipeline. We study these choices on two long-document QA benchmarks with both frontier API and open-weight VLMs. First, on MMLongBench-Doc our six-tool agent with page, table, figure, and search calls pays off only once the answering VLM is large enough: with Qwen3.5-4B and 9B it trails static page input, with Qwen3.5-27B it draws level, and with Sonnet 4.5 it leads. On LongDocURL it is level with or ahead of static input at every reader. Its lead over the strongest static pipeline is clearest with the frontier reader on MMLongBench-Doc and narrows to within noise on LongDocURL. Second, retrieval modality matters more than the specific retriever: the strongest image retriever leads the strongest text pipeline, and on the text side a single off-the-shelf cross-encoder rerank essentially matches a much heavier multi-stage LLM pipeline. Top-k image retrieval is also the most token-efficient input at every reader we paired it with, at roughly a seventh to a quarter of the tokens of sending every page. Third, cutting across all three choices, three of our strongest pipelines succeed on different questions, and an oracle that picks the best pipeline per question gains roughly thirteen points over the best single pipeline, though evidence-type routing recovers almost none of it.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.29933
Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) operating in GNSS-denied urban environments require alternative methods for position estimation. Existing approaches based on satellite image retrieval or learned descriptors are sensitive to appearance variation and degrade rapidly as the search area grows. We present a vision-based localization system that matches building patterns observed from a downward-facing UAV camera against a reference building footprint database. Our approach detects buildings in aerial imagery, accumulates observations across frames into a unified map, and matches local building arrangements against reference footprints using a novel geometry-driven descriptor that augments local triangle structure with per-building shape features. By encoding spatial relationships between nearby buildings rather than visual appearance, the system is robust to appearance variations and remains discriminative over large search areas. Evaluations on seven flights across four municipalities in a large metropolitan area demonstrate 100% Recall@1 at search areas of approximately 113 km$^2$ and 254 km$^2$, and 71.4% Recall@1 when expanded to approximately 452 km$^2$, encompassing up to 277,000 buildings. In contrast, baseline methods degrade rapidly and achieve 0% Recall@1 at 254 km$^2$ and 452 km$^2$.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.28225
4D radar complements dense image semantics with long-range geometry and radial motion, but existing radar--camera detectors largely solve \emph{where} to align the modalities while leaving \emph{whether} a piece of evidence supports an evolving object hypothesis implicit. An image token may describe an occluder, a nearby radar return may belong to another object, and a pose-aligned memory slot may carry incompatible motion. We formulate \emph{hypothesis-conditioned evidence grounding}, which separates candidate access from evidence use: semantic, geometric, or temporal evidence is filtered or conditioned by the evolving 3D state before updating the corresponding query. \sgdetpp{} instantiates this principle through Anchor-Grounded Semantic Retrieval (AGR), which conditions deformable image retrieval on pooled anchor-consistent radar support; Geometry-Consistent Anchor Refinement (GCR), which attentively aggregates individual associated returns; and Doppler-Verified Correspondence (DVC), which replaces history only when current radial motion contradicts it. \sgdetpp{} improves the strongest compared method by 3.82 mAP and 6.82 ODS on OmniHD-Scenes and by 6.82 mAP and 9.22 NDS on ManTruckScenes, while also leading the listed methods in the TJ4DRadSet test comparison. Mechanism-targeted evaluations show that AGR improves strict AP in every projected-occlusion bin, the yaw-aligned box gate raises target-return purity from 29.95\% to 58.87\%, and DVC preserves 96.11\% of motion-consistent history while retaining 75.90\% contradiction recall. Code will be released.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.27671
Text-to-image retrieval with frozen dual encoders degrades when the query names a small, visually subordinate object in a cluttered scene: a single global image embedding underrepresents the localized visual evidence. We present MINER, a training-free inference framework that augments a frozen dual encoder's global image embedding with a small bank of region-level embeddings and a hubness-correcting similarity rescoring, recovering visual evidence that global pooling underweights. To evaluate this setting, we introduce ROCS, a benchmark built from high-clutter subsets of Flickr30K and MS COCO whose images are re-captioned to name a single low-salience object. Experiments on CLIP, SigLIP, and SigLIP 2 show that MINER improves retrieval on every backbone, on ROCS and on the standard splits. Analyses show that these gains come primarily from broader spatial coverage rather than precise crop placement, revealing a simple and general way to recover localized evidence from frozen representations. Code: this https URL. Dataset: this https URL.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.27142
Radiological artificial intelligence has advanced rapidly, yet most systems remain narrowly task-specific, data-intensive, and fragile under domain shift. Foundation models promise more transferable and data-efficient solutions, but existing approaches are limited in scale, evaluated narrowly, and often assume that a single pretrained model can support diverse downstream tasks. Here we present nnFoundation, complementary convolutional and transformer-based 3D radiological foundation models. Developed within the Human Radiome Project (THRP), nnFoundation is trained on 2.1 million CT, MRI, and PET image volumes from 125 institutional and public datasets. We evaluate them across 108 tasks spanning segmentation, detection, classification, report generation, and image retrieval, including evaluations under domain shift, by external partners and in low-data and low-compute regimes. Across all task types, our convolution- and transformer-based nnFoundation models consistently outperform both prior 3D foundation models and training from scratch, establishing state-of-the-art performance for radiological imaging. However, performance follows a consistent task-dependent structure: the convolutional nnFoundation model dominates spatially localized tasks, whereas the transformer-based nnFoundation model excels in tasks requiring global semantic reasoning and in frozen-feature settings. Dynamically aligning the foundation model topology with the dataset characteristics post-hoc further improves transfer across heterogeneous 3D settings. These results show that transferable 3D radiological performance is governed not by a single universal model, but by the interplay of scalable pretraining, complementary architectures, and dataset-aware adaptation. We release nnFoundation models integrated into nnU-Net and nnDetection, enabling immediate application across established radiology workflows.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.26924
Foundation vision models provide strong generic representations, yet high class-level retrieval accuracy does not necessarily imply that an embedding respects a target semantic taxonomy. We study strict explicit-taxonomy image retrieval on frozen DINOv2 features and ask: when hierarchical retrieval improves, how much of the change is associated with the organization of taxonomy-aware supervision, and how much with the Euclidean-hyperbolic geometry choice? We evaluate higher levels with strict cross-class criteria that exclude finer-grained matches, and compare Euclidean and hyperbolic projections trained with taxonomy-distance regression or a taxonomy-aware supervised contrastive objective. A compute-matched 2 x 2 Geometry x Loss factorial uses the same 768-256-32 projector capacity, optimization schedule, batch order, and fixed 100-epoch budget; the Loss axis denotes the Regression-to-Taxonomy-SupCon objective-family contrast. On CUB, the objective-family contrasts in mean hierarchy mAP (strict middle/high average, excluding Class/Leaf) are +0.0487 in Euclidean space and +0.0414 in hyperbolic space, compared with geometry contrasts of +0.0102 and +0.0030. On NABirds Parent-disjoint retrieval, the corresponding objective-family contrasts are +0.0467 and +0.0440, whereas geometry contrasts are +0.0017 and -0.0009. A semantic-alignment control shows that the true taxonomy substantially outperforms a structure-preserving shuffled hierarchy, while a NABirds curvature/radius control does not support stronger negative curvature as the explanation for the observed hierarchy gains. Across the two taxonomies, the Regression-to-Taxonomy-SupCon contrasts are larger in aggregate than the evaluated geometry contrasts; semantic alignment also matters separately, while geometry remains hierarchy-dependent.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.25638
Visual search on large e-commerce catalogs must serve both "similarity" queries that ask for items resembling an uploaded image and "modifier" queries that comprise an image and text describing a desired modification (e.g. a color change or style swap). The latter is the setting known as composed image retrieval (CIR). Existing CIR methods, however, treat relevance as binary and train on triplets with a single positive target - a poor fit for real catalogs where many candidates partially satisfy a user query and ranking across that partial-match spectrum drives the customer experience. We propose a methodology for training CIR retrievers on graded relevance, consisting of: (i) a VLM to curate training data, generating both queries (object detection + modifier synthesis) and 4-level relevance labels without manual annotation, (ii) an iterative relevance-feedback loop that expands the training set by mining hard negatives from the in-training retriever, and (iii) a hierarchy-aware angular objective to train the retriever directly on the graded labels rather than collapsing them to a binary split. We call this methodology GradCIR and instantiate it on a PaliGemma2 bi-encoder trained on 3.5M graded pairs curated from raw Walmart catalog data. A controlled graded-vs-binary ablation isolates the supervision granularity and shows lift of 4.9%-5.9% in NDCG@10. The same recipe applied to other multimodal encoders lifts early-fusion backbones by up to 8.5% NDCG@10. On the public FashionIQ benchmark, GradCIR (applied to PaliGemma2) reaches 0.6703 average recall when fine-tuned, slightly ahead of the strongest peer-reviewed supervised baseline we compare against, and matching or exceeding all published CLIP-L-class zero-shot CIR methods. The system is deployed in production at Walmart, where it's serving live visual-search user traffic.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.24152
Brain-to-image retrieval seeks to identify the visual stimulus that elicited a non-invasive neural response. Candidate images are typically represented by pretrained vision models, whose internal representations vary in abstraction across depth. Existing methods usually train the neural encoder to recover a fixed final-layer visual target. Under this formulation, the visual hierarchy is reduced to a single prescribed endpoint, preventing representations at other depths from directly shaping the visual target. This limitation motivates learning how information across visual depths should contribute to the retrieval target. To this end, we introduce NeuroGlyph, which learns a trial-independent visual target from multiple depths of a frozen visual backbone. NeuroGlyph decomposes the target into factor-specific subspaces. Each subspace learns an image-conditioned allocation over visual depth. The resulting subspaces are fused into a single embedding for retrieval. Across THINGS-EEG and THINGS-MEG, NeuroGlyph outperforms final-layer supervision in all controlled comparisons. It also surpasses the post hoc best fixed-layer oracle in three of four comparisons. Parameter-matched ablations support both factorized target construction and image-conditioned depth allocation. Under comparable 200-way retrieval protocols, NeuroGlyph achieves the strongest system-level performance in six of eight reported metrics. These results support learning retrieval targets across the visual hierarchy rather than prescribing one visual depth.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.24136
Zero-shot brain-to-image retrieval requires robust alignment between noisy EEG responses and visual representations. Existing EEG-vision alignment methods often operate in sensor space and apply fixed visual supervision to all responses, ignoring both spatial mixing in scalp EEG and response-wise variability in alignment reliability. We propose an adaptive cortically constrained EEG-vision alignment method for zero-shot brain-to-image retrieval. The method reconstructs EEG responses into predefined ROI-level source-pattern representations and encodes them with a Neuro-ROI Attention Encoder. To handle response-wise variability, we introduce an evidence-based adaptive visual supervision strategy that weights detail-controlled visual targets using model-based alignment evidence. On THINGS-EEG, the proposed method achieves strong 200-way zero-shot retrieval performance, with ROI-level attribution providing post hoc interpretability of the learned source-pattern representations. These results show that cortically constrained representation learning and adaptive supervision can jointly support EEG-vision alignment for zero-shot brain-to-image retrieval.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.24109
Cache-based test-time adaptation improves CLIP predictions by storing and retrieving examples from the target stream while keeping the model frozen. However, existing methods largely treat the feature space used for image-image retrieval as fixed, leaving open how much adaptation depends on the retrieval space itself. We study this question by fixing the memory and changing only the retrieval encoder, finding that the same memory can yield very different gains: across sixteen retrieval spaces, ImageNet-A cache gain ranges from at most +0.44 points for CLIP and MAE to +19.7 +/- 0.4 for DINOv2-L, while label-free retrieval-space selection retains 98% of oracle gain on ImageNet-V2. These results show that memory quality depends not only on which examples are stored, but also on how they are retrieved. Motivated by this finding, we propose MARC (Memory Augmented Retrieval for CLIP), a training-free system that uses frozen CLIP for prediction and DINOv2-B for retrieval with a single fusion weight. A single-view cache repairs 1074 +/- 21 baseline errors, compared with 878 +/- 4 for a 64-view ensemble, at roughly one seventh of the cost. Across four ImageNet distribution shifts, MARC reaches a 67.91% OOD average and, at matched DINOv2-B scale and eight views, achieves 64.17 +/- 0.31% versus 62.75 +/- 0.15% for a graph-based cache system while running 2.6 times faster. Overall, our results establish retrieval space as a first-order design choice for robust cache-based adaptation in remote sensing, scientific imaging, and changing visual environments.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.23409
Graph-based retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is widely used for multimodal, cross-document question answering. However, building corpus-level graphs is expensive, slow to query, and difficult to maintain. We present TrioRAG, a graph-free multimodal framework that integrates evidence from three complementary signals: the question, the anchor image, and a VLM-enhanced query generated from both. Each signal retrieves independently over a shared multi-vector index of page text and page images, and the results are combined through late fusion. Further, we introduce AutoQA, a multimodal automotive benchmark whose questions are grounded in noisy, web-sourced images rather than clean document-sourced figures. Its questions require reasoning across manuals. We position it as a model-curated testbed rather than a human-validated gold standard. Across three benchmarks, TrioRAG matches or outperforms graph-based systems while reducing total cost and accelerating per-query inference by 1.6-2.3 times. By construction, AutoQA grounds its questions in out-of-corpus web images. In this setting image retrieval reaches only 19.3% document-level recall, while text-derived signals, especially the VLM-enhanced query, keep retrieval robust.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.19417
Content-based image retrieval (CBIR) has advanced significantly with deep learning, yet effectively ranking similar images remains challenging, particularly in high-dimensional feature spaces, where pairwise distances often fail to capture contextual relationships and the semantic gap between visual features and high-level concepts persists. Manifold learning and rank-based refinement methods have emerged as complementary strategies, respectively improving feature representations and exploiting contextual information embedded in ranked lists, such as neighborhood relationships among images. However, combining these projection-based and rank-based strategies to exploit their complementary properties remains a challenging research problem. To address this, we propose a framework that combines neighbor embedding projections with rank-based manifold learning through rank aggregation. Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP) generates alternative low-dimensional feature representations, and ranked lists obtained from UMAP projections and rank-based re-ranking methods are combined using the Borda Count aggregation strategy. Experiments were conducted on several public datasets using deep learning features extracted from ResNet152, Swin Transformer, and DINOv2 models. Results show that the proposed approach improves retrieval effectiveness in several scenarios, particularly when the baseline representation struggles to achieve high precision. The aggregation strategy also often improves the quality of top-ranked positions, leading to competitive Mean Average Precision (MAP) and Precision values across different datasets and feature extractors. These findings suggest that combining projection-based and rank-based manifold learning strategies through rank aggregation can provide complementary contextual information for image retrieval tasks.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.01963
Composed image retrieval (CIR) retrieves a target image from a reference image and a text modification. This paper studies metadata-available CIR reranking, where a fixed CIR model first returns a candidate pool and gallery metadata is then used for second-stage concept-guided scoring. We introduce AutoConcept, a training-free reranker that converts concept evidence into an interpretable memory. AutoConcept filters noisy concepts, activates query-relevant positive constraints with an auxiliary negative penalty, and combines base retrieval scores with metadata-based concept-candidate alignment through inference-time calibration. On FashionIQ, AutoConcept yields significant early-rank improvements over WeiMoCIR and consistent plug-in gains on LinCIR candidate pools. Metadata-aware controls show that structured concept memory adds signal beyond direct query-text and extracted-attribute matching, while a query-only variant further supports the effectiveness of concept-level reranking. A supplementary real-human concept-label study indicates that the same memory interface can consume participant-provided evidence. These results position AutoConcept as an interpretable concept-memory reranker for product-style CIR galleries with available metadata.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.01456