Survey
-
Computational Humor with Multimodal LLMs: Methods, Datasets, Evaluation, and Challenges
2026-07-21 11:53:46Tuo Liang, Zhe Hu, Disheng Liu, Jing Li, Yu YinAbstract
Multimodal humor in memes, cartoons, and comics remains difficult for AI systems because intended meaning depends on non-literal mechanisms, shared cultural knowledge, and communicative intent rather than literal scene description. This survey focuses on visual humor understanding in single-image and multi-panel artifacts, while treating humor generation as an emerging downstream frontier. We position the literature against prior humor, sarcasm, and general MLLM surveys and organize it using a capability-centric hierarchy spanning recognition, interpretation and reasoning, and generation. Under this lens, we synthesize benchmark design, evaluation protocols, and modeling paradigms, tracing the field's shift from task-specific fusion models to large-model approaches based on multimodal alignment, evidence-grounded reasoning, and controlled generation. We conclude by highlighting the main barriers to progress: shortcut-prone evaluation, limited cultural and narrative coverage, weak evidence grounding, and unresolved safety and ownership concerns.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.19011
PDF
-
Public perceptions of AI-driven decision-making in healthcare: A structural equation modeling approach
2026-07-21 09:14:00Leonie Westerbeek, Ernesto de Leon, Julia C. M. van WeertAbstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly integrated into healthcare to support diagnostics, decision-making, and administrative processes. However, the successful implementation of AI depends not only on technical performance but also on public perceptions of its helpfulness, riskiness, and fairness. This study examines public perceptions of automated decision-making (ADM) in healthcare. Data were drawn from the first wave of an ongoing longitudinal survey panel. The final sample consisted of 3,915 respondents and was analyzed with structural equation modeling. Perceptions of ADM in healthcare as helpful, risky, and fair were treated as the dependent variables. AI literacy, familiarity with different forms of AI, confidence in clinicians' ability to distinguish AI- from human-generated content, use of conversational agents for health information, and use of traditional digital health information sources were included as exogenous. Greater familiarity with different forms of AI, higher confidence in the clinician's ability to recognize AI-generated content, and use of conversational agents for health information were associated with greater perceived helpfulness. Use of conversational agents was associated with lower perceived risk, whereas greater familiarity with AI and greater reliance on traditional health information sources were associated with higher perceived risk. Perceptions of ADM as fair were most strongly predicted by confidence in the clinician's ability, with additional small positive associations with AI familiarity, AI literacy, and use of conversational agents. Public perceptions of ADM in healthcare are shaped by technological familiarity, use of conversational agents, and confidence in human oversight. Overall, ADM's perceived helpfulness and fairness are driven more by trust in healthcare professionals than by trust in the technology itself.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.18884
PDF
-
Engineering Trustworthy Agentic AI for Critical Systems
2026-07-20 22:28:16Omar Al-Refai, Ibrahim Shahbaz, Adam Ali Husseinat, Michael Mandulak, Jaewon Kim, Eman HammadAbstract
Agentic artificial intelligence systems, capable of autonomous perception, planning, tool use, and multi-step action, are increasingly proposed for critical engineering domains where decisions carry physical, operational, or economic consequences. This survey addresses a gap in current literature by treating trustworthiness, whether agentic behavior can be verified, audited, and trusted under the constraints that engineering practice actually requires, as a first-class engineering property, rather than evaluating agentic AI by task capability alone. The study adopts a trustworthiness model organized around five cross-cutting dimensions: safety and constraint satisfaction; robustness and reliability; transparency and interpretability; accountability and auditability; and privacy and security. This is mapped onto an agentic assurance workflow spanning perception through audit. Building on this foundation, agentic systems architectures, threats, concrete trust mechanisms, and quantitative metrics are surveyed for direct application in agentic systems development and evaluation. These principles are then examined across four constraint-bound engineering domains: power systems, autonomous vehicles/robotics/UAVs, high-performance computing, and communication networks, identifying recurring design patterns, shared failure modes, and domain-specific gaps. Synthesizing across those domains, agentic AI trustworthiness is shown to be a single problem, with a path outlined toward a reusable, cross-domain assurance framework analogous to the graded certification regimes used by mature safety-critical engineering fields.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.18548
PDF
-
Co-addition and Subtraction of Undersampled Images
Abstract
In astronomical imaging surveys, repeated observations of the same sky patches are taken in order to obtain deeper images and detect new sources. This is the case in the search for many transient phenomena, such as supernovae, gravitational wave (GW) optical counterparts and other cataclysmic variables. In many such surveys some of the images are undersampled, meaning that the pixel size is too large, and the image suffers from aliasing. For undersampled images, both co-addition of the images and background subtraction are done in a non-optimal manner, which leads to reduced sensitivity and an increased rate of false alarms. We present a new method (named Linear Undersampled Transients \& Addition (LUTRA)) that performs both processes in a mathematically proven optimal way, which allows improved performance for many scientific applications. It also allows easy and direct performance of measurements such as photometry and astrometry in a simple manner, while providing results in super-resolution. We demonstrate the performance of the method on public ZTF data and show $\times 1.25$ higher SNR compared to current methods. We provide an open source Python implementation.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.18054
PDF
-
Large Language Models for Citation Function Classification
2026-07-20 09:29:53Daniel Vodi\v{c}ka, Jakub \v{S}m\'id, Pavel Kr\'al, Christophe CerisaraAbstract
Citation function classification plays a crucial role in understanding the relationships between scientific publications and advancing bibliometric analysis. This study presents one of the first comprehensive evaluations of multiple state-of-the-art (SOTA) large language models (LLMs) for citation function classification, achieving new SOTA results on the ACL-ARC dataset. We systematically compare five models (Mistral 7B, Orca 2-7B, LLaMA 3.1-8B, Falcon 7B, and SciBERT) across zero-shot, few-shot, and fine-tuning approaches. Our fine-tuned Falcon 7B model achieves a 73.3% macro F1 score on ACL-ARC, representing a significant improvement over previous methods. Additionally, we introduce AC3, a novel dataset featuring a seven-category annotation scheme that distinguishes between neutral acknowledgments and explicit evaluative stances (more opinion-oriented citations - criticizing, complimenting, contradicting). The dataset is implemented across four context extraction variants to systematically evaluate the impact of contextual scope on classification performance. We also provide detailed analysis of model performance, experimental configurations, and limitations to guide future research in this domain. To our knowledge, this is one of the first studies dedicated to comprehensive model comparison for citation function classification, addressing a gap identified in recent surveys.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.17738
PDF
-
Stability and Comfort in Mobile Robot-Pedestrian Interactions
2026-07-20 06:44:34Alireza Jafari, Hong-Son Nguyen, Yen-Chen LiuAbstract
Mobile robots in public spaces must ensure pedestrians' comfort, and yet empirical studies of walkers' subjective safety are rare. Many classical navigation algorithms do not distinguish the walkers from dynamic obstacles and do not explicitly model subjective human factors. Moreover, most studies focus on holonomic mobile robots, whereas applications demand Nonholonomic Mobile Robots (NMR). This paper develops socially aware algorithms for NMRs, proves the stability, verifies the performance experimentally, and statistically analyzes the reported comfort. We design a framework for NMRs using Social Force Model (SFM) and the projected Time-to-collision Social Force Model (TSFM). We formalize the NMR-pedestrians' and NMR-obstacles' interactions and prove the system's stability, assuming boundedly nonpassive pedestrians. Simulations calibrate the models by maximizing a hybrid cost function of comfort and speed. Pedestrian-robot interaction experiments compare SFM and TSFM to two remote-controlled baselines and collect walkers' reported comfort. Statistical tools analyze survey results collected during the experiments. Benchmarking the algorithms against previous studies highlights the proposed methods' advantage with respect to the studied metrics. Overall, the models are stable and improve pedestrian comfort when an NMR navigates through a pedestrian crowd.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.17604
PDF
-
Scalable Model-Assisted Multi-Target Estimation in Large Image Collections
2026-07-20 05:54:36Max Hamilton, Jinlin Lai, Daniel Sheldon, Subhransu MajiAbstract
Computer vision models are increasingly used as measurement tools to estimate population-level quantities from large image collections, but prediction errors introduce bias and the resulting estimates lack statistical guarantees required in scientific applications. Prior work uses a Monte Carlo framework to combine model predictions with ground-truth annotations by sampling some images for humans to label and is able to provide unbiased estimates with controllable accuracy, but primarily addresses single-scalar estimation. We study the more general problem of multi-target estimation, where many quantities (e.g., class counts or proportions) must be estimated simultaneously, and adapt sampling and estimation strategies from survey sampling to this setting. Evaluations on five detection and segmentation datasets with 7-80 classes show that importance sampling excels with moderate annotation budgets or fewer targets, whereas uniform sampling with control variates is superior when estimating many targets or operating with minimal labels. Additionally, a subset-based ratio estimator remains highly competitive across all regimes. Ultimately, our framework effectively combines biased model predictions and limited human labels into rigorous scientific measurements.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.17581
PDF
-
Empirical Grounding Improves the Realism of LLM Agents Simulating Human Behavior During Disruptions
2026-07-19 23:06:28Chen Xia, Zexi Kuang, Yuqing HuAbstract
Large language model (LLM) agents offer a generative approach to simulating human behavior under conditions that may have few or no direct historical analogues, a common challenge in disaster and infrastructure-disruption planning. However, this generative capacity creates a validity problem: individually plausible agent reasoning may fail to reproduce empirical population behavior. We evaluate whether empirical grounding improves the statistical realism of LLM-agent simulations during disruptions. Specifically, we develop an empirically grounded LLM-agent framework that embeds demographic profiles from the American Community Survey, baseline routines from the American Time Use Survey, and urban spatial context into agent initialization, memory, decision prompts, and activity execution. An independent household survey conducted during the July 2024 Philadelphia heatwave is reserved as an external validation benchmark. Compared with an ungrounded LLM-agent baseline, the grounded model improved reconstruction of normal daily routines, increasing mean correlation with empirical activity profiles from 0.528 to 0.912 and reducing mean squared error from 0.066 to 0.008. Under heatwave conditions, the grounded model better reproduced survey-derived activity profiles, increasing mean correlation from 0.349 to 0.836 and reducing mean squared error from 0.098 to 0.012. The grounded model captured 46.4% of observed heatwave response amplitude, compared with 20.6% for the ungrounded baseline. These findings show that empirical grounding can make LLM agents more statistically credible simulators of population behavior while revealing remaining gaps in modeling human adaptation during disruptions.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.17437
PDF
-
Auditing Question-Order Effects in Large Language Models with the QQ Equality: Mechanism Characterization and a Saturation Caveat
Abstract
Human survey respondents exhibit question-order effects that satisfy the QQ (quantum question) equality, an a priori, parameter-free prediction of the projective quantum question-order model. We develop the QQ equality into an audit criterion for sequential judgments of autoregressive large language models (LLMs). Theoretically, we characterize which mechanism classes satisfy it robustly: marginal-independent kernels satisfy QQ iff all four mismatch transition rates coincide (a class containing the 2D rank-1 projective model with a fixed measurement pair under state variation); a polarity- and position-dependent repetition family is characterized by an exact cross-symmetry condition with closed-form violations; QQ-satisfying behaviors are closed under order-matched mixing; and the rank-2 Contextuality-by-Default criterion translates into audit coordinates as $|\qQQ|\le\OSS$, where $\OSS$ (the order-sensitivity score) totals the order sensitivity of the two marginals. Methodologically, we develop a pre-specified, audit-logged pipeline applicable to any model exposing next-token log-probabilities; it combines worst-case robustness envelopes, sampling-consistency spot checks, full label counterbalancing, and a saturation diagnostic. Empirically, in a first-signal pilot on an open-weight instruction-tuned model under two framings, all pre-specified health gates passed, yet 17/18 and 7/8 item pairs, respectively, were saturated (near-deterministic), and no item was certified residually contextual. Forced-binary next-token log-probabilities were thus inadequate for distribution-level QQ audits under the tested model and prompting conditions; we recommend pre-specified saturation diagnostics whenever next-token distributions are treated as survey-response distributions.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.17219
PDF
-
How Formerly Incarcerated People Envision Technologies for Prison Parole
2026-07-17 21:29:38Saiph Savage, Jesse Nava, Wanqing Iris Zhou, Hwijoon LeeAbstract
AI-driven algorithms and automated tools are increasingly embedded in the correctional landscape, shaping parole eligibility,release decisions, and surveillance. These tools are also often framed as objective, inevitable solutions to inefficiency andbias. Yet, these computational systems are rarely designed with input from justice-impacted individuals, which means theymight fail to address the real needs of incarcerated people. To address this gap, we surveyed 31 formerly incarcerated peopleabout their parole experiences and their visions for technologies that could support parole preparation. Contrary to dominantassumptions, participants did not imagine computational tools as instruments to dismantle the prison system, but as resourcesfor navigating power: translating complex parole concepts into culturally familiar terms, documenting personal transformationin board-legible ways, and recognizing the often-invisible labor of families. We argue that these imaginaries point towardtechnologies designed for strategic agency, where tools help incarcerated individuals and their families build the capacity tonavigate existing power structures in pursuit of freedom. We conclude by reframing computational tools for parole awayfrom surveillance and toward human-centered systems that support people in navigating carceral power structures.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.16513
PDF
-
Signal-based Model Access Risk Analysis for AI System Operations Security
2026-07-17 18:05:47Maria Mahbub, Steven Young, Amir Sadovnik, Edmon Begoli, Chris Rugenstein, Donald Coulter, Anthony AyodeleAbstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) systems are now ubiquitous across domains such as security, finance, healthcare, consumer technology, and large-scale cloud services, where they process massive volumes of data and make consequential decisions daily. This widespread adoption has created a broad attack surface through which adversaries can manipulate, evade, extract information from, or otherwise subvert deployed models. Depending on system design and exposure, attackers may have very different forms of access: some observe only final decisions, while others receive confidence scores, intermediate representations, or even full model parameters. While previous surveys typically organize evasion attacks into white-box, gray-box, and black-box categories based on the attacker's knowledge of model internals (architecture, parameters, gradients), this taxonomy often conflates different deployment scenarios that provide vastly different output signals, all labeled as ``black-box'' despite enabling fundamentally different attack strategies. Understanding how evasion attack strategies adapt to the specific information signals returned by deployed systems is critical for organizations making procurement and deployment decisions. To address this gap, we introduce the Signal-based Model Access Risk Taxonomy (SMART), a deployment-oriented framework that classifies attacker access according to the nature and richness of the information signals available from deployed AI systems. Using this taxonomy, we provide a structured overview of evasion attacks across progressively richer levels of information exposure, highlighting how deployment interfaces influence attack capabilities and informing more secure AI deployment and procurement decisions.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.16414
PDF
-
LLM-Powered Agentic AI for 5G/6G Networks: A Tutorial and Survey on Architectures, Protocols, and Standardization
2026-07-17 15:47:23Mazene Ameur, Abdelkader Mekrache, Bouziane Brik, Adlen KsentiniAbstract
Agentic Artificial Intelligence (AI), enabled by Large Language Models, marks a shift from rule-based automation toward autonomous, goal-driven control of Next-Generation Networks (NGNs). Existing surveys treat the two domains in isolation, leaving protocol integration, evaluation, and standardization alignment underexplored. To address this gap, a two-part tutorial-and-survey is presented. Part I formalises the control, management, and AI-native planes of 5G and 6G. It then covers the foundations of agentic systems: reasoning, planning, tool use, multi-agent coordination, and evaluation. Part II maps agentic capabilities onto 5G/6G control surfaces, standardization, and major 6G initiatives. Finally, it identifies open challenges shaping autonomous telecommunications.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.16066
PDF
-
Distribution-First Population Simulation: Collapse, Calibration, and Recall in Non-WEIRD LLM Persona Modeling
Abstract
Synthetic-population tools increasingly run every individual as an independent large language model (LLM) agent. Using real survey microdata, we show that this paradigm has a basic failure mode, and we set a distribution-first corrective against it, all measured with a deterministic, construct-validated verifier on non-WEIRD (Turkey-first) data. First, N independent LLM agents grounded on 2,414 real World Values Survey respondents fail to reproduce the population's response distribution: they pile onto a modal default (four scenarios x five seeds: concentration 0.36->0.69, entropy 1.46->0.77, 85% collapse, TVD=0.44), and the collapse is a predictable function of scenario structure (r=0.55 with a single-answer structure). Second, Verbalized Sampling (VS) fixes the field's chronic under-dispersion without training in three model families (fidelity +7 to +10; significant on Qwen, p=0.002, d=6.2), yet the same move universally overshoots into over-dispersion (SD-ratio 0.4-0.56 -> 1.26-1.37), a structural property of VS. Third, survey fidelity transfers only weakly to agentic behavior: in a single-model, single-domain booking task, a persona is dominated by a cheapest-default (~80%) that income modulates but does not override (comfort choice 0%->7%->32% across income bands). Fourth, a placebo-controlled memorization attack and an election backtest show VS keeps aggregate strength while subgroup and individual claims are contaminated by recall and underdetermination. We close with the corrective: model the distribution once (VS) and assign it to grounded characters at O(1) cost, with a budget-aware router whose honest AUC is 0.805, not the tautological 1.0 of a code-derived oracle. The central contribution needs no realism claim: it measures the internal inconsistency of the independent-agent route and the conditions under which the distribution-first route calibrates.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.18310
PDF
-
Logic, Optimization, and Artificial Intelligence
Abstract
Logic and optimization can, in combination, make valuable contributions to rule-based AI. Logic is the obvious medium for encoding a rule base and drawing inferences from it, while optimization provides a powerful technology for computing inferences. Their combination has taken on new relevance amid a growing concern for transparency in AI. which is important for reproducibility, explainability, trustworthiness, and fairness. Rule-based AI provides a natural solution to transparency that is becoming increasingly practical due to today's highly advanced optimization methods. This article surveys several areas of logic-optimization partnership, including probabilistic logic, Bayesian logic, belief logics and Dempster-Shafer theory, nonmonotonic (default) logic, many-valued logics, and inference of logical formulas from noisy data based on Boolean regression. It shows how to compute projections, the fundamental problem of both logic and optimization, using decision diagrams and logic-based Benders decomposition. It describes the use of postoptimality analysis to explain how conclusions are reached, further enhancing transparency, as well as the role of optimization in answer set programming modulo theories. The paper concludes by suggesting possible future research directions.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.15532
PDF
-
BrainPilot: Automating Brain Discovery with Agentic Research
2026-07-16 14:49:25Haoxuan Li, Tianci Gao, Jianhe Li, Yang Fan, Runze Shi, Weiran Wang, Tianxiang Zhao, Zezhao Wu, Xiaoyang Jiang, Qihui Zhang, Jia Li, Xiao Xiao, Kai Du, Xiaoxuan Jia, Chao Xie, Lu MiAbstract
Understanding the brain increasingly depends on integrating evidence across scales, modalities, and disciplines. Addressing a single research question therefore requires a coordinated sequence of operations, from surveying prior work to executing analyses and interpreting results in light of domain knowledge. AI agents promise to accelerate this process, but current agents lack domain expertise in brain science, may fabricate claims, drift during multi-step reasoning, and offer few defined points for expert intervention. These failures are especially costly in brain science, where conclusions feed into downstream scientific claims and depend on laboratory-specific expertise and careful human judgment. We present \textbf{BrainPilot} a \textbf{fully open-source} multi-agent system that accelerates brain science research with traceable logs and agent-verified results. A principal investigator (PI) agent coordinates specialist agents grounded in curated domain knowledge: a unified brain science knowledge base containing 7{,}233 indexed items and a skill library of 72 reusable methodology units across seven research domains. Every major step is recorded in the Graph of Trace, an auditable record that links subgoals, tool use, evidence, and claims and allows researchers to follow and inspect the workflow. An Auditor agent further integrates fabrication checking into the workflow. For evaluation, we run three brain science tasks from Agents' Last Exam, introduce our own benchmark, \textbf{BrainPilotBench-v0}, and present additional end-to-end case studies. Across these evaluations, BrainPilot with an open-source backbone model attains performance comparable to state-of-the-art agent framework with less costs.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.15079
PDF
-
Blurring Modal Boundaries: A Unified Survey from Single- to Multi-Modal Person Re-ldentification
2026-07-16 10:39:22Xiao Wang, Bing Wang, Bin Yang, Cuiqun Chen, Xin Xu, Mang YeAbstract
Person re-identification (ReID) serves as a critical component in intelligent surveillance systems, aiming to match identities across disjoint camera networks. While traditional methods primarily rely on single-modal RGB imagery, they are often constrained by environmental challenges such as low illumination and occlusion. To overcome these limitations, the field is rapidly evolving toward cross-modal and multi-modal paradigms. This survey presents a comprehensive overview of this transition, systematically reviewing key cross-modal tasks including visible-infrared (VI-ReID), text-image (TI-ReID), sketch-based (Sketch-ReID), and the emerging Non-Line-of-Sight (NLOS) ReID, which extends perception beyond direct visibility. Furthermore, we examine tri-spectral and multi-modal fusion ReID, discussing how complementary information from diverse sensors enhances robustness. Beyond summarizing datasets, challenges, and methodologies, we propose a Transformer-based baseline framework for visible-infrared ReID, designed to effectively capture modality-invariant features. Finally, based on the current landscape, we outline several promising directions for future research.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.14821
PDF
-
Governing Artificial Intelligence: Public Preferences and Regulatory Options
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming economies, societies, and polities, raising fundamental questions about how it should be regulated. Policymakers face choices over whether to prioritize innovation or safety, rely on public oversight or private self-regulation, and govern nationally or internationally. Yet little is known about how citizens evaluate these competing priorities. Here we report a conjoint survey experiment conducted in seven countries with diverse political and economic profiles. We find that citizens strongly support regulating AI and generally prioritize safety over innovation, public governance over private self-regulation, and international over national approaches. The preference for safety is strongest among those who perceive AI as risky, unpredictable, and personally consequential. These findings reveal a systematic misalignment between dominant regulatory approaches and citizen preferences.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.14585
PDF
-
Mixed-Agent Museum Tour Guide Design Improves Gendered Learning Outcomes and Visitor Preferences
2026-07-16 01:31:55Annette M. Masterson, Wonse Jo, Helena C. Sieh, Lionel P. Robert, Jr., Dawn TilburyAbstract
Robots are increasingly integrated into everyday contexts, including museums, where they can both entertain and educate visitors. To enhance visitor experience and engagement, we present a novel mixed-agent tour guide system that combines a physical robot with a projected virtual agent that actively participates in the tour through conversation and interaction, achieving the interaction richness of two mobile agents from a single platform. We validate the system through a within-subjects study with 30 participants to assess engagement, quality of experience, and learning performance. Participants experienced different conversational styles and agent configurations, and data were collected via surveys, behavioral sensors, and interviews. Results showed that engagement and quality of experience remained consistent across conditions. Learning performance revealed a significant gender-moderated difference: the mixed-agent conditions improved learning performance for female participants. This suggests that the proposed dyadic conversational style in this paper influenced learning performance differently by gender. Nonetheless, in interviews, participants reported a greater preference for mixed-agent teams regardless of gender, citing interaction as a key factor in their experience.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.14468
PDF
-
Global drivers and barriers to the public acceptance of autonomous vehicles: Evidence from 17 countries
2026-07-16 00:08:12Antonios Saravanos (New York University)Abstract
This study investigated the public acceptance of Society of Automotive Engineers Level 3 conditionally automated cars, which can self-drive under certain specified conditions but require the human driver to remain ready to resume control when requested. Previous Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2 (UTAUT2)-based research has focused mainly on European samples, and so it is still unclear whether the same factors shape acceptance across broader world regions. This knowledge gap was addressed using the L3Pilot Global User Acceptance Survey. From an original dataset of 18,631 respondents, the final analytic sample comprised 18,603 respondents from 17 countries across Africa, Asia, Europe, North America, and South America. The data were analyzed using a UTAUT2-based structural equation model to examine how performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, facilitating conditions, and hedonic motivation shape the intention to use Level 3 cars. The model showed strong explanatory power. Across the analytic sample, the intention to use Level 3 cars was driven mainly by performance expectancy, social influence, and hedonic motivation. Effort expectancy and facilitating conditions also contributed, but they played smaller direct roles. Age, gender, and previous experience with advanced driver assistance systems were statistically significant, but comparatively weak predictors. Overall, the findings suggest that the acceptance of Level 3 automated cars depends less on demographic characteristics or ease-of-use concerns and more on whether people see the technology as useful, socially supported, and enjoyable to use.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.14436
PDF
-
Measuring How Students Rely on Generative AI in Academic Writing: Development and Multi-Source Validation of the Generative AI Reliance Types Scale
2026-07-15 19:04:11Shahin Hossain, Tukhbita Afroz NawmiAbstract
As generative AI (GenAI) becomes increasingly embedded in undergraduate academic writing, how students rely on these tools, rather than simply whether they use them, has become a central question for learning, academic integrity, and educational equity. Existing measures of reliance were developed inductively, focused on discrete problem-solving tasks, and validated mainly with homogeneous samples. This study developed and validated the GenAI Reliance Types Scale (GenAI-RTS), a 20-item instrument measuring four theoretically derived types of GenAI reliance: Strategic, Instrumental, Dependent, and Dialogic. Validation followed the multisource framework of the Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing, drawing on a survey of 382 undergraduates at a U.S. Minority-Serving Institution and interviews with 14 purposively sampled students. Confirmatory factor analyses of six competing models supported a five-factor structure in which Strategic Reliance comprises two facets, Deliberate Use and Critical Evaluation, alongside Instrumental, Dependent, and Dialogic factors (CFI = .92, RMSEA = .08; DWLS CFI = .98, RMSEA = .07). Subscale reliability was acceptable to good (omega = .75-.88), and scalar measurement invariance held across gender, first-generation status, and STEM/non-STEM majors, to our knowledge the first such evidence for a GenAI reliance instrument. Rasch analysis indicated that a five-point response format would improve category functioning. Strategic reliance was positively associated with AI literacy, and the reliance types differentiated students across multiple writing process and outcome variables. The GenAI-RTS offers researchers and educators a theoretically grounded, psychometrically validated instrument for identifying undergraduate reliance profiles and supporting research, assessment, and AI literacy intervention.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.14301
PDF
