Paper Reading AI Learner

Cross-Sensor Periocular Biometrics: A Comparative Benchmark including Smartphone Authentication

2019-02-21 16:24:40
Fernando Alonso-Fernandez, Kiran B. Raja, R. Raghavendra, Cristoph Busch, Josef Bigun, Ruben Vera-Rodriguez, Julian Fierrez

Abstract

The massive availability of cameras and personal devices results in a wide variability between imaging conditions, producing large intra-class variations and performance drop if such images are compared for person recognition. However, as biometric solutions are extensively deployed, it will be common to replace acquisition hardware as it is damaged or newer designs appear, or to exchange information between agencies or applications in heterogeneous environments. Furthermore, variations in imaging bands can also occur. For example, faces are typically acquired in the visible (VW) spectrum, while iris images are captured in the near-infrared (NIR) spectrum. However, cross-spectrum comparison may be needed if for example a face from a surveillance camera needs to be compared against a legacy iris database. Here, we propose a multialgorithmic approach to cope with cross-sensor periocular recognition. We integrate different systems using a fusion scheme based on linear logistic regression, in which fused scores tend to be log-likelihood ratios. This allows easy combination by just summing scores of available systems. We evaluate our approach in the context of the 1st Cross-Spectral Iris/Periocular Competition, whose aim was to compare person recognition approaches when periocular data from VW and NIR images is matched. The proposed fusion approach achieves reductions in error rates of up to 20-30% in cross-spectral NIR-VW comparison, leading to an EER of 0.22% and a FRR of just 0.62% for FAR=0.01%, representing the best overall approach of the mentioned competition.. Experiments are also reported with a database of VW images from two different smartphones, achieving even higher relative improvements in performance. We also discuss our approach from the point of view of template size and computation times, with the most computationally heavy system playing an important role in the results.

Abstract (translated)

URL

https://arxiv.org/abs/1902.08123

PDF

https://arxiv.org/pdf/1902.08123.pdf


Tags
3D Action Action_Localization Action_Recognition Activity Adversarial Agent Attention Autonomous Bert Boundary_Detection Caption Chat Classification CNN Compressive_Sensing Contour Contrastive_Learning Deep_Learning Denoising Detection Dialog Diffusion Drone Dynamic_Memory_Network Edge_Detection Embedding Embodied Emotion Enhancement Face Face_Detection Face_Recognition Facial_Landmark Few-Shot Gait_Recognition GAN Gaze_Estimation Gesture Gradient_Descent Handwriting Human_Parsing Image_Caption Image_Classification Image_Compression Image_Enhancement Image_Generation Image_Matting Image_Retrieval Inference Inpainting Intelligent_Chip Knowledge Knowledge_Graph Language_Model Matching Medical Memory_Networks Multi_Modal Multi_Task NAS NMT Object_Detection Object_Tracking OCR Ontology Optical_Character Optical_Flow Optimization Person_Re-identification Point_Cloud Portrait_Generation Pose Pose_Estimation Prediction QA Quantitative Quantitative_Finance Quantization Re-identification Recognition Recommendation Reconstruction Regularization Reinforcement_Learning Relation Relation_Extraction Represenation Represenation_Learning Restoration Review RNN Salient Scene_Classification Scene_Generation Scene_Parsing Scene_Text Segmentation Self-Supervised Semantic_Instance_Segmentation Semantic_Segmentation Semi_Global Semi_Supervised Sence_graph Sentiment Sentiment_Classification Sketch SLAM Sparse Speech Speech_Recognition Style_Transfer Summarization Super_Resolution Surveillance Survey Text_Classification Text_Generation Tracking Transfer_Learning Transformer Unsupervised Video_Caption Video_Classification Video_Indexing Video_Prediction Video_Retrieval Visual_Relation VQA Weakly_Supervised Zero-Shot