Paper Reading AI Learner

Perceiving University Student's Opinions from Google App Reviews

2023-12-10 12:34:30
Sakshi Ranjan, Subhankar Mishra

Abstract

Google app market captures the school of thought of users from every corner of the globe via ratings and text reviews, in a multilinguistic arena. The potential information from the reviews cannot be extracted manually, due to its exponential growth. So, Sentiment analysis, by machine learning and deep learning algorithms employing NLP, explicitly uncovers and interprets the emotions. This study performs the sentiment classification of the app reviews and identifies the university student's behavior towards the app market via exploratory analysis. We applied machine learning algorithms using the TP, TF, and TF IDF text representation scheme and evaluated its performance on Bagging, an ensemble learning method. We used word embedding, Glove, on the deep learning paradigms. Our model was trained on Google app reviews and tested on Student's App Reviews(SAR). The various combinations of these algorithms were compared amongst each other using F score and accuracy and inferences were highlighted graphically. SVM, amongst other classifiers, gave fruitful accuracy(93.41%), F score(89%) on bigram and TF IDF scheme. Bagging enhanced the performance of LR and NB with accuracy of 87.88% and 86.69% and F score of 86% and 78% respectively. Overall, LSTM on Glove embedding recorded the highest accuracy(95.2%) and F score(88%).

Abstract (translated)

谷歌应用商店通过评分和文本评论捕捉来自世界各地的用户思维,在一个多语言的竞技场中。由于其指数增长,无法手动提取评论中的信息。因此,通过机器学习和深度学习算法利用自然语言处理(NLP)进行情感分析和情感揭示,本研究对应用商店评论进行情感分类,并通过探索性分析识别出大学生对应用商店的态度。我们使用了TP、TF和TF IDF文本表示方案的机器学习算法,并使用Word嵌入、Glove在深度学习范式上进行比较。我们的模型在Google应用商店上进行训练,并在学生应用商店上进行测试。各种算法之间的组合通过F分数和准确度进行了比较,并突出了图形上的推理。SVM等分类器在词干和TF IDF方案上具有很高的准确率(93.41%),F分数(89%)。贝叶斯均衡增强了LR和NB的表现,准确度分别为87.88%和86.69%,F分数分别为86%和78%。总体而言,GloVe嵌入的LSTM记录了最高的准确率(95.2%)和F分数(88%)。

URL

https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.06705

PDF

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2312.06705.pdf


Tags
3D Action Action_Localization Action_Recognition Activity Adversarial Agent Attention Autonomous Bert Boundary_Detection Caption Chat Classification CNN Compressive_Sensing Contour Contrastive_Learning Deep_Learning Denoising Detection Dialog Diffusion Drone Dynamic_Memory_Network Edge_Detection Embedding Embodied Emotion Enhancement Face Face_Detection Face_Recognition Facial_Landmark Few-Shot Gait_Recognition GAN Gaze_Estimation Gesture Gradient_Descent Handwriting Human_Parsing Image_Caption Image_Classification Image_Compression Image_Enhancement Image_Generation Image_Matting Image_Retrieval Inference Inpainting Intelligent_Chip Knowledge Knowledge_Graph Language_Model LLM Matching Medical Memory_Networks Multi_Modal Multi_Task NAS NMT Object_Detection Object_Tracking OCR Ontology Optical_Character Optical_Flow Optimization Person_Re-identification Point_Cloud Portrait_Generation Pose Pose_Estimation Prediction QA Quantitative Quantitative_Finance Quantization Re-identification Recognition Recommendation Reconstruction Regularization Reinforcement_Learning Relation Relation_Extraction Represenation Represenation_Learning Restoration Review RNN Robot Salient Scene_Classification Scene_Generation Scene_Parsing Scene_Text Segmentation Self-Supervised Semantic_Instance_Segmentation Semantic_Segmentation Semi_Global Semi_Supervised Sence_graph Sentiment Sentiment_Classification Sketch SLAM Sparse Speech Speech_Recognition Style_Transfer Summarization Super_Resolution Surveillance Survey Text_Classification Text_Generation Tracking Transfer_Learning Transformer Unsupervised Video_Caption Video_Classification Video_Indexing Video_Prediction Video_Retrieval Visual_Relation VQA Weakly_Supervised Zero-Shot