Flow matching is now the dominant approach for vision-language action (VLA) robot policies, thanks to its expressiveness and simple training objective. However, inference for standard flow matching requires iteratively solving an ODE, limiting the control frequency at deployment. While several works have proposed novel methods to allow for single-shot action generation, we ask whether such additional objectives are actually necessary. We find that across six flow matching VLAs, one-step action generation largely matches multi-step sampling at scale: multi-step integration confers little to no consistent advantage at inference. We empirically find that this holds as long as models are sufficiently trained and have enough capacity. Practically, the implication is that for large VLAs, the single-step policy comes essentially for free from the multi-step model, enabling low-latency deployment without retraining, distillation, or auxiliary objectives.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.30735
Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models have shown promising results in multi-task robotic manipulation by leveraging visual and language understanding for action generation. However, existing lightweight VLA models employ a single dense action expert to handle all tasks, which limits their multi-task capability under constrained computational budgets. To address this issue, we propose SmolVLA-MoE, a novel framework that introduces sparse Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) into the FFN layers of the action expert in VLA models. SmolVLA-MoE replaces dense FFN layers with multiple parallel expert FFNs and a token-level router, enabling each token to adaptively select the most suitable expert for action generation. We further introduce a shared expert with a tunable weight parameter to balance the inheritance of pre-trained capabilities and task-specific expert specialization. Through sparse activation, SmolVLA-MoE activates only a single expert FFN during inference, with a total activated parameter count of approximately 500M including the frozen VLM backbone, while benefiting from approximately 800M total stored parameters. We evaluate our method on four task suites of the LIBERO benchmark. SmolVLA-MoE achieves an average success rate of 84.25%, outperforming SmolVLA (82.75%) and OpenVLA-7B (76.5%), while maintaining comparable inference efficiency. Our code is publicly available at this https URL.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.30732
Video provides a natural source of supervision: what happens next serves as a learning signal for visual world modeling. Yet masked video pretraining focuses on recovering missing content from surrounding context rather than predicting the future from the past. Autoregressive methods instead predict forward one token at a time, but have yet to match joint-embedding methods in representation quality. This gap motivates us to revisit the granularity and space of future prediction. In this work, we introduce VANE, a self-supervised visual pretraining framework built on next-frame prediction in embedding space. A causal encoder summarizes past observations for a state predictor that infers the representation of the entire next frame, making temporal evolution the primary learning signal. This prediction is carried out in a fixed embedding space provided by a frozen semantic tokenizer, emphasizing scene content and structure. To retain fine-grained spatial detail alongside semantic content, a lightweight auxiliary generative decoder reconstructs future-frame patches conditioned on the predicted representations. To unify visual modeling across images and videos, we construct a local-to-global crop sequence for still images, allowing the same encoder to predict newly revealed regions from earlier crops under the same objective. Experiments show that VANE improves with model and data scaling, achieving SOTA on most anticipation, recognition, and dense perception benchmarks among unified encoders. Especially on EPIC-KITCHENS-100 action anticipation, it surpasses V-JEPA 2.1 by 7.1 points in mean-class recall@5. These results demonstrate that next-frame prediction in embedding space is effective and scalable for visual world modeling.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.30724
This paper studies the local geometry of semantic meaning in large language models. Current representation analyses ask whether meanings are close in embedding space, or whether linear probes separate semantic classes, but they do not characterize the within-concept local geometry: what is invariant across realizations of a single semantic factor, what varies, and what changes when meaning is refined. This paper characterizes that geometry through two controlled probes evaluated on four architecturally diverse decoder-only LLMs (Gemma 4, Llama 3.2, Qwen 2.5, Pythia). A cross-lingual probe uses language as a perturbation to separate exact meaning matches, same-factor realizations, nearby concepts, and out-of-domain contrasts. A refinement probe separates specificity-bearing semantic narrowing from high-probability attributive elaboration and adversarial controls; both probes are validated by blind human judgments. Four findings recur across all models: under mean pooling, once dominant variance directions are removed, sentence pairs order by semantic relatedness (same factor, then same domain, then different domain) without overlap over a band of layers; semantic factors organize around an invariant core surrounded by structured realization-specific variation; refinement produces directed displacement into tighter neighborhoods, including against controls built on the same base noun; and sentence-level and token-local readouts expose complementary geometry (volume contraction at the sentence level, sharper anisotropic endpoints at token-local readout). We interpret these results as evidence that LLM semantics are organized as local anisotropic neighborhoods in which meaning contracts under refinement.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.30715
Large language models (LLMs) deployed in mental-health contexts can be evaluated for safety failures, but the resulting judgments are often difficult to inspect or explain. Common approaches to improving safety rely on prompt engineering, LLM-as-a-Judge, and Constitutional AI. In this work, we describe a clinician-led alternative in which two clinicians define, finalize, and adjudicate the four safety checks of a rule base, which is formally verified for internal consistency and applied as a guardrail over LLM outputs. Here and in the title, clinician-led refers to this rule base, not to the fact extractor or the uncertainty default, which are ours. Every verdict of the resulting verification layer is recomputable from a named rule and sixteen facts. Against an LLM judge matched in model, revision, quantization, rule text, and decoding but without the layer's computed 988/911 fact, the largest disagreement class, the satisfied-rule class, is structured: the Llama-3.3-70B judge, on its primary prompt, demands a crisis resource from 55 of the 65 replies (84.6%) that already contain one, while the same model, asked as a fact extractor, reports a recognized resource present on 54 of the 55. The verification layer never raises that demand, by construction. We report with equal prominence where this judge is stronger: fewer false crisis alarms on the one reference-scored check. We also report the measured cost (a specification revision raised block-class outcomes on held-out boundary prompts of an over-refusal benchmark from 6.0% to 16.0%, chiefly by changing fact extraction), the clinicians' decision to keep our uncertainty default, and the analysis of the result. The contribution is not a safer verdict. It is a guardrail whose disagreements with the judge localize to named rules and facts and whose measured costs trace to named facts and the uncertainty default.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.30690
Visual Language Action (VLA) models are designed to be generalist robot models that can be implemented across embodiments, tasks and environments. However, their ability to collaborate with other robots and humans remains underexplored. In this work, we propose a framework to automate the generation of multi-robot collaborative data for decentralized VLA training without requiring human teleoperation. Our framework first utilizes a decentralized collaborative planning approach to generate multi-robot collaborative robot plans in the form of an executable function. We then utilize the collaborative plan to produce collaborative demonstration data to finetune VLA models in a decentralized manner. We show that our approach produces demonstration data that when used to finetune VLA models on decentralized collaboration tasks matches the task performance of VLA models finetuned on human-teleoperated collaborative data.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.30671
Large language models increasingly act as controllers in structured decision pipelines, yet their decisions are still executed by autoregressive text decoding. Hierarchical RAG is one such setting: at each frontier of a document tree, an LLM commits to $b$ of $k$ sections under an input-dependent action grammar, executed as either failure-prone free-form JSON or reliable but strictly serial grammar-constrained generation. We show that this serialization is unnecessary for bounded-horizon control: the reachable future forms a shallow action-prefix tree, which we compile --- one root prefill plus one tree-causal probe evaluate every prefix-conditioned action distribution with serial decoding's tokens, positions, and causal ancestry. A prefix-state lemma makes compiled control policy-exact in exact arithmetic: the same policy with a two-forward critical path and zero output tokens. One further probe pass certifies the exact order-marginalized MAP set. Across four document-disjoint splits and two scales on the primary MetaX device, compiled control matches the serial policy on $84$--$89\%$ of questions --- every instrumented divergence a floating-point near-tie --- and cuts control latency by $35$--$47\%$ versus token-wise serial decoding and $6$--$7\%$ versus an idealized chunked engine; an H800 repetition preserves the ordering.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.30664
Vision-and-Language Navigation (VLN) requires agents to follow instructions and navigate to target locations. However, current VLN agents often suffer severe performance degradation in unseen environments due to distribution shifts. Test-Time Adaptation (TTA) offers a promising paradigm to bridge this gap, yet existing methods that rely on unsupervised entropy minimization can propagate errors through the trajectory, causing cascading failures in navigation. Recent methods mitigate this by incorporating human feedback, but they apply trajectory-level supervision uniformly across all steps without localizing the actions is truly informative, leading to inefficient feedback utilization and mismatched optimization granularity. To address these limitations, we propose FETA, a Feedback-Efficient Test-Time Adaptation method that improves both feedback efficiency and optimization reliability. To reduce unnecessary human interventions, we introduce a hierarchical sample selection strategy to localize informative samples. Specifically, we first filter trajectories whose normalized policy entropy exhibits large fluctuations. Within each selected trajectory, we further select the critical action via an entropy-gradient saliency criterion and query a single binary feedback on its correctness. A discrepancy-aware entropy optimization objective then updates the policy only at the queried step, with adaptive scaling that assigns larger relative weights to samples with greater prediction-feedback discrepancy. Extensive experiments across multiple benchmarks demonstrate that FETA achieves state-of-the-art performance with fewer human interventions, while remaining robust under noisy feedback and continual adaptation settings.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.30643
Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) have recently emerged as important remote sensing platforms, and UAV navigation has shown great potential in remote sensing applications. However, existing methods do not explicitly incorporate kinodynamic modeling or safety distances into trajectory generation, resulting in high absolute yaw rates, frequent collisions, and low navigation success rates, which limit safety and motion stability. To address this challenge, we introduce KinoUAV, a kinodynamic benchmark comprising a dataset and KinoUAV-Agent. First, we develop a hierarchical kinodynamic trajectory generation pipeline that drives UAV through acceleration actions. It uses waypoint chains from global planning and generates trajectories segment by segment under velocity, acceleration, and jerk constraints, reducing oscillations and improving trajectory stability. Furthermore, we introduce directional free-space distance (DFD) labels into the constructed dataset to describe the available clearance for safe motion decisions. The proposed KinoUAV-Agent predicts DFDs and uses them to generate safe actions, decoupling perception from action decision-making. This design enables autonomous obstacle avoidance and improves navigation safety. The benchmark incorporates the proposed Cruise-Seek task, in which the UAV first enters the target region and then searches for the target, reducing the difficulty of target search and improving navigation success. Experiments on KinoUAV show that KinoUAV-Agent outperforms existing methods, achieving the highest success rate while maintaining lower absolute yaw rates and collision rates. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of kinodynamic modeling for safe and stable UAV navigation.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.30609
Dynamic interactive object search in large-scale human environments presents substantial challenges for existing methods. Current scene representations like 3D Scene Graphs (3DSG) only provide coarse-grained spatial segmentation and cannot identify functional areas such as storage or leisure areas. Without functional area understanding, existing methods are constrained to exhaustive sequential exploration at large scales, resulting in inefficient search behaviors -- particularly in open-layout environments with numerous interactive objects such as drawers and cabinets. Moreover, these methods lack adaptability to environmental dynamics such as object relocations. To address these limitations, this paper proposes CMAR-search, a novel framework built upon Commonsense and Memory Augmented Reasoning (CMAR). Our approach leverages commonsense about area functionalities and aggregates environmental memory to construct a Functional 3D Scene Graph (F3DSG), which organizes the environment into functional areas with their associated containers. Through this structured representation, CMAR enables hierarchical action planning at both macro-area and micro-container levels, empowering the system to efficiently identify and inspect semantically relevant areas for effective object search. Notably, CMAR continuously integrates real-time perception, accumulated memory, and commonsense to dynamically relocalize objects in changing environments. Extensive experiments in simulation and real-world settings demonstrate that CMAR-search significantly surpasses state-of-the-art baselines in both success rate and search efficiency for object search in dynamic interactive environments.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.30606
LLMs have shown strong in-context learning (ICL) capability, but extending it to Multimodal LLMs (MLLMs) remains challenging. Prior multimodal ICL methods often rely on ICL-specific datasets for additional training or task vector extraction, which can improve performance on the same ICL benchmark used for adaptation. However, they do not generalize well to other benchmarks and often induce forgetting in previously well-solved tasks. For this reason, we identify 'visual grounding' as the key bottleneck in multimodal ICL; MLLMs often fail to attend to task-relevant visual evidence in demonstrations, instead over-relying on textual cues and producing hallucinated outputs. To address this, we propose ProCoRe to enhance visual grounding through contrastive reinforcement learning on multimodal contrastive data for improving multimodal ICL. ProCoRe generates captions for contrastive image pairs, decomposes them into propositions, and optimizes contrastive rewards that encourage alignment with corresponding images while discouraging mismatched ones. Despite never seeing ICL-formatted training examples, ProCoRe improves average multimodal ICL classification accuracy by 5.6% and captioning ROUGE-L by 13.8% over the off-the-shelf Qwen-VL-3-8B model, outperforming ICL-data-dependent state of the arts across benchmarks. Finally, we introduce PICL, a personalized multimodal ICL captioning benchmark that tests whether MLLMs genuinely understand visual demonstrations rather than relying on pre-trained semantic priors.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.30592
Reliable robotic mapping in dynamic real-world environments is essential for embodied intelligence and long-term autonomy. However, existing methods often involve a trade-off: lightweight online mapping is efficient but captures limited semantic context, while dense mapping provides richer semantics at higher computational cost and is more vulnerable to distractors. They also struggle to relocalize objects after scene changes. To address these challenges, we propose the Online Anchor-centric Scene Inference System (OASIS), a unified system for online mapping, complex open-vocabulary retrieval, and navigation in dynamic environments. Motivated by the observation that indoor scenes are organized around stable semantic anchors, OASIS represents the environment using a sparse set of anchor nodes, each maintaining a unified multimodal representation that integrates semantic descriptions, visual features, and geometric states for reasoning, verification, and navigation. Its compact anchor-centric memory supports on-demand evidence extraction and hierarchical retrieval, reducing redundant storage while improving retrieval reliability. To handle scene dynamics, OASIS further reuses transient observations collected during navigation to relocalize moved objects. Experiments in both simulation and real-world environments, including standard retrieval benchmarks and navigation tasks under both static and dynamic settings, demonstrate that our system can perform complex open-vocabulary retrieval and navigation, while also enabling relocation of displaced objects after scene changes.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.30589
Recent advances in foundation-model agents have enabled increasingly capable embodied systems for long-horizon planning and interaction. However, embodied agents require fast, closed-loop decisions as they continuously perceive and act on a changing environment. Deploying strong cloud agents leaves the platform idle for seconds between consecutive actions, while lightweight local models respond quickly but are more vulnerable to errors. Existing hierarchical architectures typically assign models fixed roles, whereas conventional model routers make stateless per-request decisions. We present CARE, a critic-guided adaptive execution framework that dynamically determines when to escalate control from a local executor to a stronger cloud model. A lightweight critic model monitors execution reliability and triggers escalation when local execution becomes unreliable; once escalated, control persists until the agent recovers, avoiding step-wise switching. To support such control transfer, a shared handoff memory maintains execution context and task-level progress across executors, enabling the model to intervene without restarting from scratch. Across diverse embodied benchmarks, CARE improves task success by 6.3-18.3 percentage points over the strongest evaluated collaboration baseline. CARE further approaches or exceeds Cloud-only success while reducing median time-between-action latency by 28.8-82.6%.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.30587
LLM agents that act on live Web data must combine heterogeneous evidence, remember what they have done and improve from outcomes without weakening their own safeguards. We study this problem in autonomous investing, where every action is irreversible and based on untrusted Web content. We present Steward, a multi-agent LLM system that draws the boundary of self-evolution in its type system. First, nine role-specialised agents decide jointly: four analysts read news feeds, SEC filings, macroeconomic series and market data and emit typed reports, from which a Portfolio Manager sets target positions that a protected Risk Manager audits. Second, a seven-layer shared memory, assembled by code from the system's own record, gives each decision its position context, the market narrative, calibration and the agent's past decisions. Third, the system improves itself by review: code grades every trade and forecast nightly and writes the grades into memory, and each quarter a reflector proposes prompt learnings that a deterministic gate applies reversibly and replay of recorded inputs verifies. All three operate around an invariant core of order arithmetic, risk rules and discipline-agent prompts that no self-edit can reach. In a five-month live deployment (102 trading days, 1,632 LLM calls), the system contained a 24.6% sector drawdown to a 0.3% loss; in replay of its recorded inputs, a single model given the same raw data traded more and lost 1.35 points against the market over five days where the joint design showed no significant loss, and no injected instruction was followed; and a 2015-2026 backtest shows the core alone lowering the maximum drawdown under all 50 random entry policies. The reflector traced the dominant failure to its root cause, and the gate applied a learning that the agent adopted on trigger evenings and on no control evening. Code: this https URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.30557
Human motion retargeting bridges the embodiment gap between humans and humanoid robots by converting human demonstrations into reference trajectories for whole-body control and loco-manipulation. For object-interaction tasks, successful execution depends on accurately preserving body--object relations at critical stages. However, uniform per-frame iteration budgets do not account for these localized accuracy requirements, limiting the computational efficiency of retargeting. To address this limitation, we present Spatiotemporal Retargeting (STR), which uses keyframes and key body parts to allocate optimization effort. Specifically, a vision-language model selects relevant motion signals and body parts, and keyframes are identified from changes in the selected signals. Based on these selections, STR assigns additional solver iterations to keyframes and higher interaction weights to the selected parts. To further improve contact fidelity, we introduce Mechanics-Aware Contact Anchoring (MCA) to refine object-surface contact positions using an approximate object-wrench model while retaining the selected surface directions. Building on the resulting references, we develop Spatiotemporal Reinforcement Learning (STRL), which combines adaptive key-stage sampling with a contact reward based on target proximity and object contact forces for downstream control. Simulation experiments on a Unitree G1 and real-world experiments on a Unitree R1 demonstrate that STR improves geometric contact coverage and continuity at lower computational cost, while the resulting references improve downstream task completion across diverse object-interaction motions.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.30540
Predicting surrounding vehicles' lane-change intentions enables autonomous vehicles to anticipate potential hazards and respond proactively rather than relying solely on reactive maneuvers. This study investigates the benefits of integrating lane-change prediction, based on knowledge graph embeddings and Bayesian inference, into autonomous vehicle decision-making. Three driving strategies are evaluated in risky merging scenarios simulated in CARLA: reactive driving, prediction-based longitudinal action, and prediction-based lateral action. The proposed prediction model anticipates the surrounding vehicle's lane change approximately 3-4 seconds before its occurrence, allowing the ego vehicle to adjust its behavior accordingly. In the representative simulation records, reactive driving results in a collision accompanied by aggressive deceleration. In contrast, prediction-based longitudinal action initiates early braking to establish a safe gap, while prediction-based lateral action performs a lane change when a safe adjacent lane is available. Both predictive strategies avoid collisions in the evaluated records. Compared with reactive driving, peak deceleration before impact is reduced by 31.5% with longitudinal action and 91.0% with lateral action. Additionally, an ISO 2631-1-based horizontal vibration estimate is used to provide a ride comfort assessment. Overall, the results highlight the potential of lane-change prediction to support safer and smoother driving through proactive decision-making, with additional insights into ride comfort provided by vibration-based estimates.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.30528
Personal intelligence systems are taking on increasingly complex everyday tasks, yet repeated questions, unnecessary confirmations, and unwanted outreach can turn capable assistance into interaction burden. Reducing this burden requires agents to remember how users want to be assisted. However, existing memory benchmarks focus on factual recall and personalized answers and rarely test how agents learn and act on interaction preferences. We introduce MemPABench, an interactive environment for on-policy evaluation of memory in personal agents. MemPABench poses long-horizon tasks requiring agents to decide when to clarify, confirm, or act autonomously. Four grounded simulated users hold 14 preferences across work and personal contexts. Their feedback spans 99 sessions over four months, with five event-driven changes per user testing memory updates. We evaluate preference selection, delivered behavior, and sensitivity to context and preference change. Evaluating four memory systems across four LLM backbones, we find that current memory brings limited gains in preference selection. Retrieval-based systems (i.e. Mem0, MemOS, simple RAG) do not outperform No Memory, while File-based memory improves accuracy but applies preferences beyond relevant contexts. Our analysis shows that current memory struggles to retrieve interaction preferences and adapt to preference changes. Even with the correct preference available, overriding the agent's default interaction habits remains challenging. The environment and dataset are available at this https URL.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.30485
Saliency and scanpath models are developed almost exclusively on natural photographs, yet paintings are composed by artists to guide the viewer's eye and differ from photographs in texture, colour and abstraction. We introduce \avatt, a free-viewing eye-tracking dataset on \nImages{} paintings spanning sixteen art movements and five centuries, with \nScanpaths{} scanpaths and \nFixations{} fixations from \nParticipants{} participants (\spPerImageMin--\spPerImageMax{} observers per painting). For every painting we release individual scanpaths with fixation timing and eye--screen distance, fixation maps, saliency maps smoothed at one degree of visual angle, temporal saliency videos and rich art metadata. We benchmark classic and deep saliency models against human agreement, revealing substantial headroom for art-aware models, and rank 44 scanpath-similarity measures, including a new language-free family of image-encoder metrics built on ten CNN, ViT and self-supervised encoders. With controls that remove viewing biases, we show that faces are fixated \faceEnrich$\times$ more than expected and within half a second, that local structure draws the eye, that composition rules fitted from image content predict where people look, and that art style shapes how much viewers agree. Dataset, code and a Python package are available at: this https URL.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.30481
Should an embodied agent's experience be baked into its policy weights, or kept external and retrieved at inference? A memory-augmented teacher (a VLM that retrieves lessons, with their episode images, from its own past attempts) produces trajectories on a vision-conditioned reach task; from the same trajectories we distil LoRA student policies and evaluate them under matched protocols, including one that re-attaches the teacher's frozen retrieval buffer to a fixed set of student weights. We pre-registered the hypotheses, arms, tests, and analysis rules before training and before any p-value. Distilling the memory-augmented behaviour into weights beat an action-only control by +1 pp (n.s.); the registered test proves underpowered for its own minimum effect, so we withdraw - rather than refute - the memory-in-weights claim. Attaching retrieval to a fixed set of student weights added +34 pp (z=5.15), reaching the pooled memory-augmented teacher reference (49.3%); the pre-registered protocol contrast agrees (+23 pp, z=3.36); under a pre-registered auto-reset sensitivity count the two are +36 and +29 pp. An exploratory behavioural probe with pre-registered per-arm predictions is consistent with behavioural distillation transferring the marginal correction but not the conditional, situation-specific correction that retrieval supplies. The recipe that follows is to externalise the memory: in follow-up controls registered before they ran, the same frozen buffer lifts the base model with no adapter to 48% (sensitivity 48%) and the other three adapters from 19-26% to 53-55% (sensitivity 17-21% to 50-55%), and the adapter adds nothing detectable once the buffer is attached. On a second, harder task, the retrieval advantage points the same direction but falls short of significance (+6 pp, 95% CI [-4.5, +16.4]); exploratory diagnostics tie the attenuation to memory coverage.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.30478
General purpose multimodal language models (LMs) are increasingly capable of directly controlling robotic arms (e.g., by commanding end effector poses) to manipulate their environment. Tracking the development of these capabilities is important for understanding their potential benefits, such as improving industrial automation, and risks, such as enabling malicious users to produce dangerous chemical or biological agents. To this end, we investigate the ability of frontier multimodal LMs to directly control physical robotic arms. We evaluate nine models at multiple reasoning-effort and service-tier settings on six manipulation tasks taken from the RoboDojo benchmark. To our knowledge, this is the first systematic comparison of a broad range of frontier LMs across a common suite of manipulation tasks on physical hardware. We find that current frontier models can directly control real robotic arms to perform a variety of manipulation tasks but are not yet precise or efficient enough to complete them within a practical action budget. However, these capabilities are improving rapidly: performance increases on our benchmark between July and October 2026 (inclusive) correspond to a performance doubling time of 53.9 days, while the best recorded execution rate increased by a factor of 4.4 and the lowest recorded execution cost fell by a factor of 6.2. These trends raise the possibility that the Bitter Lesson is coming to robotics; the capabilities of embodied general purpose LMs may one day be comparable to those of more specialized models.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.25287