Dental cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) systems often employ detector configurations that provide a truncated field of view (FOV) that only captures a small part of the patient's anatomy. In this work, we aim to reconstruct an extended FOV using projections of truncated FOV scans. To this end, we propose a three-stage framework that consists of (1) an implicit neural representation (INR) for estimating missing parts of the truncated projection data, (2) an iterative reconstruction for generating a secondary volumetric image with improved anatomical consistency and (3) a fast diffusion model for image enhancement. The proposed approach combines the strengths of continuous representations, physics-based reconstruction and generative refinement within a unified pipeline for truncated CBCT imaging. Experimental results demonstrate that the method effectively reduces truncation artifacts, improves the reconstruction of structures extending beyond the original FOV and produces images with enhanced quality. Our code is publicly available at this https URL.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.28110
Segmentation-based multi-object tracking (MOT) with foundation video models such as SAM2 offers strong localization quality, yet remains fragile in crowded, real-world scenes. In detector-prompted SAM2 pipelines, failures typically arise at three stages of the object lifecycle: (i) erroneous or duplicate track initiation, (ii) memory drift during close interactions, and (iii) unreliable re-identification after long occlusions or re-entry. These errors corrupt object memory and accumulate over time, making long-horizon tracking unstable. In this paper, we reframe MOT as a lifecycle memory integrity problem. We present LiAM-SAM, a Lifecycle-Aware Memory (LiAM) framework with targeted mechanisms for each of the three failure modes. At track birth, to prevent faulty or duplicate initiations, we apply contrastive track initiation, which conditions each prompt on existing nearby tracked instances. To preserve memory integrity during strong interactions, we introduce motion- and geometry-grounded memory correction that resolves interaction confusions and suppresses drift. For reliable re-identification after disappearance, we maintain an adaptive context memory that promotes diverse and trustworthy references as long-term identity anchors. Finally, similarity aware spatial pruning optionally selects the memory tokens to retain at cross-attention time, improving efficiency with minimal accuracy loss. LiAM-SAM represents a modular, detector-agnostic, SAM2-based MOT system that achieves state-of-the-art HOTA and IDF1 on the evaluated benchmarks. In association-challenging environments, our ablations show that LiAM improves a detector+SAM2 baseline by +10.5 HOTA, +17.4 AssA, and reduces identity switches by 96%.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.28078
Steel surface defect detection is critical for automated industrial quality control but remains challenging due to subtle inter-class texture differences and pronounced class imbalance. We introduce TEEP-RCNN (Texture-Enhanced Edge-aware Perception Region-based CNN), a two-stage detector built on Faster R-CNN with a Feature Pyramid Network backbone and an improved Convolutional Block Attention Module (CBAM). Our CBAM adds dropout regularization in the channel attention MLP and batch normalization on the spatial attention branch, reducing co-adaptation and stabilizing gating logits. Training uses a differential learning rate protocol with cosine annealing warm-up, separating update rates for the pre-trained ResNet-101 backbone and the detection head. At inference, predictions are refined via Test-Time Augmentation fused with Weighted Box Fusion (WBF), improving localization stability on elongated and boundary-adjacent defects. On the NEU-DET benchmark across six defect categories, TEEP-RCNN achieves 73.3\% mAP@50 and 37.9\% mAP@50-95 in only 10 training epochs on a single GPU, competitive with YOLOv11m (76.2\% mAP@50, 100 epochs) while outperforming it on the rolled-in-scale category under the COCO metric. Per-class analysis shows the spatial attention branch is most effective on elongated texture defects such as patches and scratches, while crazing remains an open challenge across both paradigms due to its distributed non-local texture structure.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.28077
Video understanding is usually benchmarked on curated, single-actor, or professionally filmed clips, and a strong score there is routinely read as evidence a model is robust enough for deployment. Amateur team sport is a useful, largely untested place to check that assumption: over eight million students played a school sport in the United States in 2024-25 alone, almost none of it filmed by more than a single fixed camera, with several candidate actors crowded into frame and no operator or second angle to fall back on. Using volleyball as a test case, we ask whether strong performance on general video and world-model benchmarks translates into reliable, per-player attribution once footage is this chaotic, turning footage into statistics through a chain of tasks from finding play boundaries to naming who did what. We evaluate four approaches (prompting and agentic reasoning over frontier vision-language models, classical computer vision with small trained specialists, self-supervised video world models, and manual annotation) at every stage, on 66 amateur matches with 46,648 human-labelled contacts, filmed under conditions no published benchmark uses. No single paradigm wins every stage, and static, single-frame computer vision is not competitive at any stage involving motion or identity. A prompted model segments matches well, yet a far smaller trained model beats it at spotting contacts for a fraction of the cost, and the sport's own rules recover rally outcomes the pixels cannot. Identity is where every automated approach struggles: a jersey number is a static fact temporal reasoning cannot recover if never visible, unlike sporting action, a repeated motor pattern a temporal model can exploit, which is why holistic reasoning improves event detection while identity stays unchanged. We close with where each approach earns its cost, and what transfers beyond volleyball to amateur sport.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.28049
Conference policies distinguish using Large Language Models (LLMs) to polish one's own review from delegating the critique, but current Artificial Text Detection (ATD) methods largely measure surface form rather than the origin of its content. We instead measure the external information carried by a review: information not explained by the reviewed paper and a generic reviewing instruction. We propose Self-Conditioning, an unsupervised information-theoretic estimator that compares the likelihood of a review under its production context with its likelihood when that context is augmented with hints extracted from the review itself. On the IntelLabs peer-review benchmark, Self-Conditioning separates fully-delegated from machine-polished reviews with AUC up to $1.0$ while remaining largely insensitive to surface rewriting. Moreover, as generators receive increasing amounts of externally-provided information, their scores move monotonically towards the human regime, unlike standard ATD baselines. High-temperature sampling can evade the estimator, but at the cost of output quality.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.28041
Space weather early warning depends on detecting solar wind transients in in-situ measurements at the first Sun-Earth Lagrange point (L1), before they reach Earth. Fixed thresholds can miss combined magnetic and plasma structure, and many learning methods provide a single anomaly score. We present the Physics-Informed Solar-wind Convolutional autoEncoder for Space-weather (PISCES), a convolutional autoencoder trained without catalog labels on OMNI solar wind measurements under physics constraints. Its loss includes magnetic field consistency, an empirical relation between temperature and velocity, the Parker spiral angle, and penalties on changes between consecutive one-minute samples in derived quantities calculated from the reconstruction. At inference, PISCES separates the anomaly score into magnetic and plasma reconstruction errors, physics relations, and residual corrections, and reports the magnitude of each contribution. Attenuation of the skip connections, selected on validation data, improves average precision for the trained models, while the untrained scores remain nearly the same. The trained models also give a more consistent ordering of these physical contributions. After smoothing with a trailing median, the alarms can precede independently observed sudden commencements, including positive sudden impulses.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.28022
Long-conversation memory benchmarks increasingly test recall and prompted knowledge updates, and recent work studies evolving user beliefs and memory state. TWIST is a proposed benchmark suite for a complementary, unmeasured property: intervention quality -- whether a deployed memory system, exercised through its own ingest/recall/vet surface, acts correctly at belief change points. Four tracks cover unprompted tension detection, vetting outgoing drafts against the record, answering with current beliefs while preserving supersession history, and governing sensitive recall. The suite extends LoCoMo's corpora and harness, pairing every detect/block metric with a matched do-not-over-detect control: surface-matched hard negatives price false intervention, so no track can be gamed by flagging everything. The benchmark itself is validated first: independent, gold-blind double annotation with adjudication, judge decoy calibration, and a separability audit. On the human-validated Track B v1.0 key (161 items, post-adjudication kappa = 0.85), no tested configuration simultaneously achieves high contradiction recall, high hard-negative specificity, and high attribution: flat-RAG baselines detect 0.76-0.97 of true contradictions but falsely flag 16-43% of surface-matched safe drafts depending on backend, while a deployed coherence-oriented system almost never over-flags (0.98-1.00 specificity) yet catches 42% of true contradictions -- a trade-off no recall-only score can see. A 13-configuration baseline ladder localizes causes: every gold contradiction is detectable from its evidence alone (recall 1.000), calibrated models nearly solve the track given the full transcript -- consistent with substantial retrieval-coverage gaps -- and draft-only floors reveal model-dependent style priors. A system's TWIST profile, beside its recall score, measures whether memory knows when to intervene and when not to.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.28575
The SYNTAX score is an established tool for assessing coronary artery disease and guiding revascularization treatment decisions. However, its manual estimation from coronary angiography videos by clinical experts is time-consuming and subject to inter-reader variability. While machine learning has shown promise in automating this process, prior work has primarily focused on lesion detection, characterization, or binary disease classification, leaving direct SYNTAX score prediction relatively unexplored. We propose SynSeq, a video-based method for direct SYNTAX score prediction. It combines targeted preprocessing with a tailored training strategy using a zero-inflation-aware loss and linear target scaling. Evaluated on the public CardioSyntax dataset, SynSeq significantly outperforms previous state-of-the-art methods, improving $R^2$ by 0.55, reducing prediction bias by 93.1% and achieving more consistent performance across annotations from three independent expert graders. In addition, SynSeq achieves a weighted $F_1$-score of 0.80 for revascularization treatment recommendations, slightly below inter-expert agreement. These results demonstrate the potential of SynSeq to provide consistent, automated SYNTAX score assessment and reliable decision support for coronary revascularization planning.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.27696
Automated assessment of the Critical View of Safety (CVS) in laparoscopic cholecystectomy requires both recognition of the three CVS criteria and anatomical grounding in small, rare, and often occluded hepatocystic structures. Learning-based methods differ in the anatomical information they use, from image-level classification to detection, segmentation, or graph-based reasoning, yet grounding the safety-critical anatomy remains the main bottleneck. We propose CasCVS-Net, a staged multi-task cascade that jointly performs object detection, semantic segmentation, and CVS assessment, trained on the Endoscapes dataset. The model couples the tasks through predicted anatomy: predicted boxes guide segmentation, and predicted masks provide region-level features for CVS classification, so CVS assessment at inference uses only model predictions rather than ground-truth annotations. To reduce optimisation instability in this coupled setting, training progresses from detection to detection-segmentation and then to the full three-task cascade, followed by task-wise fine-tuning. Evaluation on the public unseen test set shows that CasCVS-Net improves over matched single-task baselines on all three tasks, achieving 32.0 detection mAP, 46.8 semantic mIoU, 15.3 rare-anatomy mIoU, and 67.2 CVS mAP. It outperforms the state-of-the-art LG-CVS and SV2LSTG by 6.3% and 4.5% relative CVS mAP, respectively, corresponding to 4.0 and 2.9 mAP points. These results show that staged task coupling through predicted boxes and masks improves anatomical grounding for CVS assessment, particularly for rare hepatocystic structures.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.27681
4D radar complements dense image semantics with long-range geometry and radial motion, but existing radar--camera detectors largely solve \emph{where} to align the modalities while leaving \emph{whether} a piece of evidence supports an evolving object hypothesis implicit. An image token may describe an occluder, a nearby radar return may belong to another object, and a pose-aligned memory slot may carry incompatible motion. We formulate \emph{hypothesis-conditioned evidence grounding}, which separates candidate access from evidence use: semantic, geometric, or temporal evidence is filtered or conditioned by the evolving 3D state before updating the corresponding query. \sgdetpp{} instantiates this principle through Anchor-Grounded Semantic Retrieval (AGR), which conditions deformable image retrieval on pooled anchor-consistent radar support; Geometry-Consistent Anchor Refinement (GCR), which attentively aggregates individual associated returns; and Doppler-Verified Correspondence (DVC), which replaces history only when current radial motion contradicts it. \sgdetpp{} improves the strongest compared method by 3.82 mAP and 6.82 ODS on OmniHD-Scenes and by 6.82 mAP and 9.22 NDS on ManTruckScenes, while also leading the listed methods in the TJ4DRadSet test comparison. Mechanism-targeted evaluations show that AGR improves strict AP in every projected-occlusion bin, the yaw-aligned box gate raises target-return purity from 29.95\% to 58.87\%, and DVC preserves 96.11\% of motion-consistent history while retaining 75.90\% contradiction recall. Code will be released.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.27671
Modern text-to-image (T2I) models generate high-quality images from arbitrary user prompts, yet they can just as easily produce not-safe-for-work (NSFW) content. Conventional outer guardrails consist of two components: a prompt classifier that checks for risk before generation, and a post-hoc image classifier that checks the fully generated image. In this design, both classifiers operate outside the generation pipeline and do not use the model's own representations. This separation can limit prompt-screening accuracy, while the image-side check runs only after the full generation cost has been spent. Moreover, a flagged prompt can only be rejected, even when it could be adjusted to produce a safe image. In this work, we propose the Inner Guardrail (InGuard), a safety framework that works inside the pipeline on the model's own representations, leaving base-model parameters untouched. First, a risk classifier grades each prompt as unsafe, risky, or benign based on the text encoder's embeddings, with no external language model. Second, SAGE (Soft-gated Asymmetric Guardrail for Embeddings) modifies the embeddings of risky prompts, aiming to return a safe image instead of a refusal. Third, a latent detector checks the one-step clean latent estimate midway through denoising, reaching nearly image-level performance and halting generation when risk is detected. We also construct the RevGen Safety Benchmark to evaluate T2I safety under realistic conditions: 10,000 prompts built through real-image reverse generation, with a rewriting step that supplies controlled intellectual-property (IP) characters, covering graded porn/gore risks, categorical IP risks, and benign negatives. Across five open-weight T2I models, InGuard reaches 97.9-98.8% safety rate, matching or exceeding the outer guardrail, with 57.5-73.5% less benign disturbance, ~3.7x fewer parameters, and 50-55.6% of denoising steps skipped.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.27620
An AI-generated radiology report can resemble a physician's report while omitting an abnormality, adding an unsupported finding, or reversing its presence. Measuring these factual differences is essential for evaluating report generators. We study Jev, a System One decision model, as a simple, low-cost judge of agreement with physician-written reference reports. Our evaluator checks whether each statement is supported by the other report and combines these judgments in both directions to capture unsupported claims and omissions. A single-question configuration reaches Kendall correlations of 0.573 on RadEvalX and 0.398 on RadEvalExpert with expert error counts, outperforming an open natural language inference judge under matched decomposition and aggregation. One support question per statement retains similar expert agreement to seven while using 43-45% fewer judgment input tokens. At the documented API price, judgments cost under three cents per hundred report pairs, excluding local decomposition. In a separate controlled-error test, Jev detects false negation with an AUROC of 0.977. Local RadMatch achieves stronger agreement on clinically significant errors in both expert datasets and on total errors in the shared RadEvalExpert subset. Finding-count and error-scope analyses show that benchmark agreement reflects report size and error definitions as well as medical error detection. These results support Jev as a practical judgment component for measuring factual differences in generated radiology reports and identify where more elaborate evaluation remains valuable.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.27607
DNA sequencing pipelines, spanning quality control, alignment, variant calling, and annotation, are now reliably executed by workflow management systems that orchestrate established bioinformatics tools at scale. What remains manual is the decision layer surrounding that execution: selecting quality thresholds appropriate to a sample and platform, adjudicating borderline variant calls, diagnosing anomalies, and determining which findings warrant expert review. These decisions are repetitive, judgment-intensive, inconsistent across operators, and frequently undocumented. This paper introduces BaseCamp, a novel agentic AI framework for automating the decision layer of DNA sequencing pipelines. The framework decomposes the pipeline into six specialized AI agents, covering sample intake and quality control, alignment, variant calling, annotation, cross-stage monitoring, and reporting. Critically, BaseCamp agents do not perform sequence analysis: established tools execute alignment, calling, and annotation, while the agents select among them, configure them, interpret their output, and decide what follows. This confines language model reasoning to the judgment layer where it is reliable and preserves the reproducibility existing tooling guarantees. Agent reasoning is powered by a consortium of fine-tuned, domain-specialized large language models coordinated by a central reasoning LLM, executing locally so no sequencing data leaves the operating environment, under human-in-the-loop orchestration. Evaluation shows agent-generated configurations are concordant with expert practice, that an explicit filtering ledger renders inspectable what filtering otherwise removes without trace, and that cross-stage anomaly detection surfaces conditions execution monitoring misses. BaseCamp offers a generalizable blueprint for agentic automation of scientific data pipelines.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.28557
AI research agents need reliable knowledge of how their experiments change outcomes. We introduce WhatWorkedBench to measure experimental understanding, the accuracy of predictions about component changes after budgeted experimentation. Agents inspect code, select measurements, and submit a response surface, a table predicting scores for every configuration of component settings. Exhaustive CPU execution supplies reference effects for changing each component while holding the others fixed. These effects capture combinations of changes across 36 tasks from 30 data sources and 8 workflow types, with 1248 configuration records. Core evaluation combines 4,206 numerical-control records across all eight families and 108 agent episodes across the original six. At eight new measurements, pair-effect ridge selects an optimum on 15 of 22 sources and limits every effect error to 10% of score range on three. Fitting a Gaussian process (GP) to the same agent observations raises effect recovery, accuracy relative to true effect magnitude, from 0.632 to 0.698 in the original Flash cohort and from 0.621 to 0.720 in an additional cohort. On six completed beat-detection and graph submissions, the same-observation GP raises family-macro recovery from 0.303 to 0.455. On six workflows with six binary options at 20 new measurements, encoding code equivalences, configurations with identical behavior, raises GP recovery from 0.248 to 0.462. WhatWorkedBench supports research on experimental agents, adaptive experimental design, numerical inference, and use of program structure.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.27490
This paper introduces Passing, an interactive audiovisual installation that generates an endless journey from a single continuous monorail-window recording by reconstructing it as a spatiotemporal volume. Rather than replaying the footage linearly, the work resamples its spatial and temporal structure along nonlinear trajectories, producing a continuously passing landscape whose depth, speed, and temporal order become unstable. A camera-based viewer-presence detection system estimates whether a viewer is present in the viewing zone and uses this presence state to influence transitions among rendered video sequences. The resulting video stream is fed into SpecMaskFoley, a real-time video-to-audio synthesis model that generates a synchronized soundscape for the reconfigured image. The model is not used to reconstruct an objectively correct soundtrack, but functions as a speculative listener, proposing a possible auditory interpretation of a world whose conventional spatial and temporal premises have been disrupted. Passing distributes creative agency across the artist, who defines the rules of spacetime reconstruction; the AI model, which interprets the emergent visual flow as sound; and the audience, whose embodied presence influences the audiovisual trajectory. Through this structure, the work investigates how authorship and listening may be negotiated among human intention, machine inference, and audience interpretation. Artwork page: this https URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.27489
Long-term autonomy in human-populated environments requires anticipating whether and how people will move at times a robot has not yet observed. Existing representations of pedestrian motion face a tradeoff: they either forecast future activity, reducing each location to a scalar rate, or model the full directional distribution, holding it fixed in time. We present Kairos, a predictive directional-flow memory that extends a hierarchical 3D scene graph (3DSG) to a 4D scene graph (4DSG). Every observed voxel of the reconstructed geometry stores a directional mixture and a presence rate, and spectral predictors forecast, for any future query time, both the probability that people are present and the full directional distribution of their motion. Pairwise flow dependence between adjacent voxels supports conditional queries, and per-voxel predictive variances yield calibrated credible intervals that tighten as observations accumulate. We evaluate Kairos on three real pedestrian environments: a robot-collected campus dataset, a shopping mall, and a station concourse recorded continuously for eleven months. Its learned state remains consistent under loop-closure corrections, and its forecasts are competitive with dedicated occupancy and flow models trained on the full detection stream, although Kairos learns from only the small fraction available to a patrolling robot. Finally, we validate the representation on a downstream encounter-probability planning task, where plans computed over the Kairos forecasts encounter more people than plans computed over any time-invariant map at an equal success rate. We provide the code at this https URL.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.27467
Alignment-free RGB-T salient object detection (RGB-T SOD) aims to identify salient objects from unregistered RGB and thermal image pairs without costly pre-alignment. However, spatial misalignment breaks pixel-wise correspondence and causes feature contamination during cross-modal fusion. To address this issue, we propose S2A, a semantic-to-spatial alignment framework for alignment-free RGB-T SOD. Specifically, a global-guided hierarchical fusion module (GGHF) first exploits global semantic guidance to suppress background interference and refine hierarchical intra-modal features. Subsequently, the alignment-free cross-modal channel attention module (AFCA) globally exchanges complementary semantic information through channel-wise interaction, effectively overcoming the interference caused by local spatial misalignments. Finally, a spatial deformable cross-attention module (SDCA) predicts adaptive sampling offsets to recover local cross-modal spatial correspondence. Through this semantic-to-spatial paradigm, S2A first enables reliable cross-modal semantic interaction and subsequently performs local spatial calibration, effectively reducing misalignment-induced feature contamination. Without bells and whistles, S2A achieves highly competitive performance on multiple public alignment-free RGB-T benchmarks, demonstrating its effectiveness in alleviating misalignment-induced feature contamination.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.27413
Contact detection during robotic manipulation allows robots to recognize unexpected contact and adapt their motion accordingly. However, in low-cost robot arms without dedicated force or tactile sensors, detecting weak contacts from proprioception is challenging because the resulting changes in joint-level proprioceptive signals can be small compared to normal variation and noise caused by robot motion itself. We introduce Contact-free Proprioceptive Response Estimation (CoPRE), improving proprioceptive contact detection sensitivity using only contact-free motion, without additional force sensors, contact labels, or analytical dynamics models. CoPRE estimate the expected joint torques under contact-free motion from proprioceptive state history and commanded motion, while removing recent observations that may already reflect contact. It then computes the residual between the expected and observed joint torque estimates, and maps this residual to a contact score using a noise-weighted Jacobian. Real-robot experiments on ARX Arm and Unitree G1 show that CoPRE achieves 74.1% and 82.2% recall on the tested contact trials, compared with 0%/0% on ARX and 16.3%/42.2% on G1 for the learned torque-prediction and inverse-dynamics baselines. CoPRE also reaches 90% detection rate for pushing force at 3.5 N on ARX and 5.5 N on G1. To demonstrate the downstream utility of our method, we implement belief-space manipulation planning for obstacle-aware object placement and book insertion where detected contacts update the spatial belief and enable the robot to retreat from blocked motions, adjust its pose, and retry. Project website at this https URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.27381
Generative image models can produce highly realistic images, raising concerns about potential misuse in creating deceptive content. Current deepfake approaches face several challenges, including limited generalizability, lack of interpretability, and poor actionability. To help address these, we present ASAP, an interactive visualization system designed to empower users in the analysis and summarization of deceptive patterns in AI-generated images. ASAP introduces a novel CLIP-adapted image encoder that generates interpretable representations, enabling the extraction of influential pixel regions via calculated masks. This approach facilitates the identification of key deceptive features through influence measurement techniques. These backend techniques are integrated into a visual analytics dashboard that allows users to quantify and analyze authenticity-indicative patterns in image collections containing both authentic and AI-generated images. This approach also supports the comparative analysis of various generative models, including GANs and diffusion models. We demonstrate ASAP's efficacy through a user study and two application scenarios using established fake image detection benchmarks, showcasing its ability to effectively extract and quantify deceptive patterns.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.27371
Real-world molecular design remains challenging for large language model (LLM)-based agents. It requires them to interpret design contexts, satisfy multiple constraints, identify infeasible specifications, and reason over multi-step tool outputs. Existing benchmarks do not capture this complexity, focusing instead on explicit and narrow constraints, only feasible problems, and single-path solutions. To address this gap, we propose MolDesignBench, a scenario-grounded benchmark that more closely reflects real-world molecular design for evaluating tool-augmented LLM agents. MolDesignBench comprises 2K generation and optimization instances that combine implicit requirements embedded in design narratives with explicit property and functional-group constraints, including infeasible cases, and require the effective use of 17 specialized chemistry tools. Experiments across diverse frontier LLMs reveal low success rates--with the best achieving only $\sim43$\%--and frequent failures in implicit-constraint reasoning, infeasibility detection, and tool reasoning. The corresponding fine-grained failure-mode analysis identifies implicit constraint interpretation and infeasibility detection as the primary bottlenecks, establishing MolDesignBench as a rigorous testbed to guide future research on chemical agents. The benchmark, tool interface, and evaluation code are publicly available.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.27349