Dialog
-
Event-Centric Memory with Query-Aware Graph Augmentation for Long-Term Conversational Agents
2026-10-08 13:17:59Yichen Liu, Chunfeng Yuan, Haowei Liu, Wenjuan Li, Zefeng Lin, Bing Li, Xu Chen, Weiming HuAbstract
For persistent and personalized conversational agents, memory systems can enable them to remember, update, and reason over long histories by storing past interactions and retrieving relevant information. Existing memory systems typically follow two paradigms: flat-structured memory and graph-based memory. The former is lightweight but leaves event relations and state updates implicit, while the latter explicitly models memory structure but incurs additional construction cost and introduces irrelevant relations over long histories. To address these limitations, we propose QGMem, a novel memory construction and activation framework motivated by human memory, in which experience is organized into events and query-relevant events are modeled by graph as working memory. QGMem converts long dialogue histories into event-indexed atomic memory units that preserve individual experiences and consolidates related units into dynamic memory traces that retain state trajectories and current states. When a query arrives, hybrid memory retrieval gathers complementary candidate memories, and query-aware reranking activates the most relevant units as a compact working memory. To expose relational dependencies in the working memory and support conflict-aware reasoning, QGMem organizes the working memory as a local graph, which is then encoded as a graph token and provided to the LLM together with the textual working memory to improve evidence utilization during answer generation. Experiments across six benchmarks validate the framework and show consistent gains in retrieval, multi-hop evidence composition, conflict resolution, and ultra-long dialogue reasoning with compact contexts and moderate inference cost.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.11920
PDF
-
Where Draft Trees Lose Target Mass: Exit-Guided Speculative Decoding
2026-10-08 11:40:13Shijing Hu, Xuancheng Ren, Zhihui Lu, Pan ZhouAbstract
Tree-based speculative decoding verifies multiple draft continuations in one target-model pass, but finite trees built from draft scores face a fundamental draft-target mismatch. We ask whether better exact verification can increase acceptance on a fixed tree and how target feedback can improve the tree itself. Through a target-flow view, we identify a canonical exit law and prove that one plus target coverage sharply bounds the expected output-block length, including the bonus token, of any exact path verifier. All optimal verifiers share the same exit and bonus-token law, already attained by representative predraw-and-follow and sequential residual verifiers. This yields Tree Exit Verification (TEV), an exact, level-parallel procedure using one exit-node decision and one bonus-token decision. The exit law also identifies missing target probability, providing node-level feedback for Exit-Guided Draft-Tree Training (ExitTrain) on inference-time draft trees. Experiments across dialogue, code, and mathematical reasoning validate fixed-tree equivalence: ExitTrain increases average output-block length by 13%, while TEV reduces verifier-stage latency by 15%, yielding a 14% end-to-end speedup over DDTree. Our results distinguish two opportunities: better draft trees for higher acceptance and more direct verification for lower latency. Code: this https URL.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.11750
PDF
-
UXBench Pro: Benchmarking Personalized User Experience in Multi-Turn Dialogue Interactions
2026-10-08 10:15:55Mengze Hong, Zeyang Lei, Wenbo Shang, Xia Zeng, Xiying Zhao, Qi Zhu, Chen Jason Zhang, Di Jiang, Taiming Fu, Qiongyi Zhou, Qinghe Chang, Fubao Zhang, Chenxuan Ma, Minlong Peng, Jinfeng Huang, Zineng Zhou, Jindou Wu, Muge Qi, Sijun He, Xin Cui, Di Liang, Yuan Hua, Davey ChenAbstract
Evaluating user experience (UX) with automated computational methods has gained increasing attention, supported by empirical evidence from UXBench. However, binary preference prediction provides limited insight, while relying on a single user-agnostic reward model overlooks the inherent heterogeneity of users, whose expectations can differ substantially. In this paper, we present UXBench Pro, comprising 1{,}000 test instances derived from real user interactions across 12 task scenarios and 82 domains. Each instance is paired with a FACTORS user profile that characterizes the user through seven interpretable behavioral facets, differentiating user groups. To provide richer evaluation insights, we introduce a dual-perspective paradigm that combines a personalized User Reward Model (URM) for third-person judgment with Sim4Eval, a user simulator that enables multi-turn interactions and provides first-person evaluation across four cognitive state dimensions. To assess the reliability of these based evaluators, we further introduce two meta-benchmarks, URMBench and USimBench, that evaluate how faithfully they reproduce real human preferences and behaviors. Extensive experiments reveal seven key findings that highlight the importance of user modeling and multi-perspective evaluation, offering a fresh perspective on user-centric benchmarking and motivating personalized model optimization.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.11638
PDF
-
Measuring Cultural Alignment Beyond the Average: A Framework for Evaluating Maternal-Health LLM Interactions in Indian Contexts
2026-10-08 09:35:15Umaira Izhar, Gunjan Arora, Pushpendra SinghAbstract
Existing evaluation methods for healthcare LLMs primarily assess factual correctness,safety, and fluency, while providing limited insight into whether generated interactions reflect culturally situated healthcare reasoning. This limitation is particularly important in maternal health, where care decisions are shaped by social and relational norms. We introduce MH-INDIC, a culturally grounded evaluation framework for maternal-health interactions in urban and semi-urban North Indian contexts that operationalises cultural behaviour through ten dimensions of maternal-health reasoning. Using a 26-item survey administered to 102 pregnant and postpartum women from urban and semi-urban North India, we evaluate ten LLMs. We distinguish population level cultural alignment from profile-level behavioural variation. Although several models approximate the human population-level distribution, all evaluated systems exhibit substantially lower variation across demographic and household profiles than the human cohort, revealing a gap between aggregate alignment and profile-conditioned sensitivity. As a downstream application of MH-INDIC, we use the strongest-aligned proprietary and open-source models to generate culturally conditioned maternal-health dialogues under zero-shot, self-conditioned, and human-grounded prompting. Human-grounded conditioning produces stronger profile alignment and dialogue quality ratings, suggesting that measured cultural profiles can improve the cultural grounding of generated interactions
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.11586
PDF
-
Beyond Speech Captions: Speech-Rewarded Style Planning for Conversational Text-to-Speech
2026-10-08 08:12:28Shiao Zhu, Lianbo Liu, Sizhen Lyu, Yuzhe Wang, Sheng Li, Takahiro ShinozakiAbstract
Natural-language style descriptions provide an interpretable interface between large language models (LLMs) and controllable text-to-speech (TTS). However, using descriptions as pseudo-labels compresses target acoustics into text, and descriptive fidelity need not imply effective control of a particular synthesizer. We empirically show that speech-text alignment only weakly predicts downstream acoustic similarity among candidate instructions for the same utterance. We therefore propose Speech-Rewarded Style Planning (SRSP), which trains a text-based style planner through a frozen downstream TTS model. Given dialogue history and response text, the planner generates candidate instructions and is optimized with group-relative policy optimization (GRPO), using the teacher-forced likelihood of target speech tokens as the reward. On an English subset of the ISCSLP 2026 CoT-TTS corpus, SRSP achieves higher speech-style and emotion similarity to target speech and lower mel-cepstral distortion than the Base LLM and target-audio-informed captioning baselines. LLM-based expressive speech evaluation further shows gains over all baselines in contextual appropriateness and reference consistency.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.11461
PDF
-
SepGen: Multi-Stem Audio-Video Separation and Generation in a Single Model
2026-10-08 06:51:59Aviad Dahan, Rajaei Khatib, Yonatan Bitton, Idan Szpektor, Lior Wolf, Raja GiryesAbstract
A 4D audio-visual scene comprises a video, the dynamic geometry it depicts, and the sound sources that populate it, each with its own position and trajectory. Rendering such a scene from a novel viewpoint requires that every source be available as an individual waveform, so that it can be localized in the scene and propagated to the observer before the signals are mixed. Joint audio-video generators can synthesize the video and its soundtrack, but the soundtrack is emitted as a single audio-mix in which the sources are not individually accessible. We present SepGen, which extends a pretrained audio-video generator to emit the video, the mixed soundtrack, and one waveform per captioned source in one joint sampling run. SepGen supports two complementary modes: generation and separation. In generation mode, each source caption specifies what its stem contains. A two-speaker dialogue, for example, comes out as one stem per speaker in the original turn order. In separation mode, the input audio-mix remains clean while the captions specify what to extract, so the model can decompose a recording from a free-text description. We evaluate generation on scenes synthesized from text, and separation on scenes rendered by other generators and on real recordings of speech, music, and sound effects. Given an audio-mix and captions that carry the spoken lines, SepGen outperforms language-conditioned separators, most clearly on speech, and it keeps the lead when the lines are removed from the captions. Code, checkpoints, and datasets are available at this https URL
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.11361
PDF
-
From Retrieval to Reconstruction: Constructing Evolvable Cognitive Memory for Long-Term Dialogue
2026-10-08 06:21:45Zirui Liao, Zhengxian Wu, Zhuohong Chen, Yunyao Yu, Xiaoyu Liu, Yifan Xu, Haoqian WangAbstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) serving as long-term dialogue agents require memory systems that support reliable reasoning over extended interactions. However, existing Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) frameworks typically treat memory as passive storage, making it difficult to distinguish source-attributed beliefs from unattributed event/fact records and to connect evidence dispersed across sessions. We introduce CogMem, a cognitive memory architecture based on the PEC$^2$F (Person-Event-Concept-Claim-Fact) graph schema. Dedicated Claim nodes preserve the source and target of subjective statements, while Fact and Event nodes represent semantic and episodic knowledge. Dialogue turns are incrementally converted into provenance-aware graph records, consolidated into higher-level facts, and reconciled into temporally scoped Claim views when the same source provides conflicting updates. For retrieval, a rule-based controller driven by LLM intent parsing composes four deterministic graph operators---anchoring, traversal, intersection, and evidence grounding---to reconstruct query-relevant context. Experiments on LoCoMo and LongMemEval show strong performance, especially on multi-hop, temporal, and knowledge-update tasks. Ablations and a semantic-collapse probe support complementary contributions from epistemic separation, consolidation, and agentic retrieval. Code: this https URL.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.11314
PDF
-
When Interfaces Speak: Data-Aware Generative UI Harness for Active Interaction
2026-10-08 02:49:35Xiaolong Li, Xiaohan Xu, Jinyang Li, Xinnuo Xu, Ge Qu, Nan Huo, Jack Williams, Reynold ChengAbstract
Most human-agent interaction today remains text-based. Natural language can impose cognitive overload, ambiguity, information chaos, and slow input for complex tasks; ephemeral generative UIs can present structured information and guide users toward task completion. We propose GenUI-Harness, a multi-agent harness pairing a Tool Agent for information retrieval and task execution with a GUI Coder Agent that identifies ambiguities and generates front-end code for structured interfaces. Training the coder with reinforcement learning is challenging: verifiable rewards for interactive UI generation require costly execution, while LLM-as-a-Judge rewards are prone to reward hacking. We address the first challenge with Dynamic UX, a lightweight package for dynamic interaction and reward collection in a single sandbox, and the second with Reward Auditor, a meta-reward mechanism that monitors reward distributions and distills diagnostic patterns into a shared rubric and scoring specification. We introduce UI-TAU Bench, a benchmark for active human-agent interaction through generated UI code, built on 10 real-world domain databases constructed from public data sources and based on Tau-Bench tool-use settings, with Lite (300 tasks) and Full (1,000 tasks) splits. GenUI-Harness achieves an average Pass@3 gain of 4.48 percentage points over smolagents on Lite. Training with GenUI-Harness improves a 4B backbone from 9.33% to 58.00% Pass@3, outperforming larger frontier models such as Claude Opus 5 (46.67%). GenUI-Harness also remains robust on ambiguous and non-ambiguous queries. In a reviewer survey comparing communication channels, generated UIs reduce average dialogue rounds from 3.4 to 1.2. These results show that data-aware generative interfaces can support effective task completion and reduce dialogue rounds in evaluated database-backed workflows.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.11123
PDF
-
Loose Lips: Understanding Privacy Leakage in Agentic Dialogue
2026-10-07 23:25:11Soumya Sharma, Ayana Hussain, Heber Hwang Arcolezi, Ulrich A\"ivodji, Spandana Gella, Adriana Romero-Soriano, Golnoosh FarnadiAbstract
As LLM agents are increasingly deployed in high-stakes enterprise settings, understanding how they handle sensitive information in agentic dialogue has become critical. Privacy leakage in such settings requires reasoning about whether information flows respect the contextual norms under which they originated. We extend CIMemories to CIMEMORIES DIALOGUE, a benchmark of 4,410 two-agent dialogue instances grounded in Contextual Integrity theory. Using this benchmark, we systematically evaluate 7 open-weight models from the Qwen3 and Llama 3.1 families across conversation lengths of 1 and 6 turns under three prompting conditions. We find that task capability and privacy leakage are fundamentally coupled: more capable models are systematically leakier, with no model in our evaluation able to decouple the two. Thinking models consistently leak more than their non-thinking counterparts, a pattern we attribute to the extended reasoning surface created by chain-of-thought. Leakage compounds with conversation length, rising up to 3x from 1 to 6 turns. Our results suggest that the coupling between task capability and privacy leakage is not an artifact of misconfiguration but a structural feature of current agentic systems.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.14071
PDF
-
Clarify, Then Focus: Statement Normalization for Conversation Analytics at Scale
2026-10-07 18:22:55Mikhail L. Arbuzov (Independent researcher), Karan Dave (Independent researcher), Evgeniya Dontsova (Independent researcher), Yaodong Hu (Independent researcher), Vincent Lao (Independent researcher), Navita Jain (Independent researcher), Sisong Bei (Independent researcher), Dmitry Dimov (Independent researcher)Abstract
Enterprise conversation analytics asks many questions of millions of interactions. Each question can require reconstructing what people mean and identifying which information matters, repeating costly interpretive work across the same transcripts. We propose a simple principle: clarify the text, then focus the reader. Statement normalization transforms dialogue into short, speaker-attributed statements with source references and semantic tags. The statements make meaning more explicit; the tags support selecting evidence for a particular question. Downstream models can use the full representation or a relevant subset, depending on what helps them make the decision. In an offer-suppression task on customer-service calls, normalization improves a supervised classifier without selection, while weaker prompted readers benefit from both normalization and selection. A small model can learn the normalization contract, while lightweight encoders handle tagging and downstream decisions. Sharing this preparation across questions supports an inference pipeline built entirely from small models, making analytics over millions of conversations substantially less expensive.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.10758
PDF
-
Conversational Task Disambiguation over Tabular Data: Leakage-Aware Formulation, Benchmark Suite, and Training
2026-10-07 18:09:55Nafiseh Ghoroghchian, Luis Scoccola, Tina Sedaghat, Omid Vaheb, Hannah Chen, Dino D'Agostino, Keyvan GolestanAbstract
Conversational task disambiguation over tabular data uses dialogue to resolve missing information about a user's intended task before producing a solution over tables or databases. Existing evaluation and training lack a leakage-aware foundation. Task success mixes the agent's disambiguation and solution-generation capabilities and can also reflect oracle leakage, that is, information that a user simulator reveals beyond what a real user would. Existing datasets also lack a shared representation of ambiguities and access boundaries. We introduce the notion of an ambiguous verifiable task, which formalizes ambiguities and resolutions, decomposing the agent into an asking policy and a solution policy, and the environment into an oracle and verifier. This framework provides baselines and metrics for evaluating task disambiguation separately from solution generation, formal definitions of oracle leakage, judge-free leakage diagnostics, and a training objective for the asking policy. We instantiate the framework in text-to-SQL with AmbiTab, a benchmark suite that unifies six ambiguous datasets under a common representation specifying what the agent, oracle, and verifier may access. We evaluate clarification strategies and oracle leakage, and train an asking policy with reinforcement learning. The trained asker improves our disambiguation metrics on all six datasets and task success on five, and our leakage diagnostics measure how training affects oracle leakage.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.10740
PDF
-
CARES: A Controlled Synthetic Benchmark of Speaker Reactions to Sound
2026-10-07 15:05:59Marcel Gibier, Thomas Thebaud, Olivier Bo\"effard, Jean-Fran\c{c}ois BonastreAbstract
Automatic audio scene description turns a recording into a text account of a situation. One difficulty is deciding which elements of the audio should be kept, since a description cannot include them all. Annotators disagree about this, making a ground truth hard to obtain. In this work, we first define the ground truth, then generate the data. We focus on audio events and define sound salience with a simple rule: a sound is salient when a speaker audibly reacts to it. For scale and variety, a controlled set of scenarios fixes the ground truth, and a language model writes the dialogues. The resulting corpus, CARES, contains 10,000 two-speaker scenes. We then benchmark six audio-language models on three tasks: identifying the scene, tagging the sounds present, and classifying reactions. We show that these models hear the sounds but miss how the speakers react to them.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.10208
PDF
-
RELATE: An Evaluation Framework for measuring Relational Orientation of Large Language Models
2026-10-07 07:10:10Shivam Shukla, Jihye Kim, Shubham Gaur, Mahnaz Roshanaei, Magy Seif El-NasrAbstract
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for emotional support, raising concern that sustained use may draw users away from their real-world relationships. Yet existing evaluations primarily focus on the safety, empathy, or helpfulness of responses, leaving under-examined a relational question: where does the model orient the user for continued support? To address this question, we introduce relational orientation, a property operationalized through two non-exclusive dimensions: inward-facing (IF) language, which positions the AI as the user's ongoing source of support, and outward-scaffolding (OS) language, which encourages real-world human connection. Grounded in psychological and sociological literature, we formalize a taxonomy of relational orientation and present RELATE, a persona-conditioned framework for measuring inward-facing and outward-scaffolding language at the sentence level in multi-turn dialogues. RELATE pairs 76 help-seeking situations adapted from naturally occurring questions with three simulated user styles, providing 228 evaluation stimuli. In our experiments, we evaluate seven LLMs using dialogues with six assistant turns each, yielding 1,596 dialogues and 69,194 assistant sentences. We assess these sentences using a primary rubric-based LLM judge and apply a secondary judge to a subset. Under automated evaluation, we find that the proportion of sentences labeled as IF is higher at the sixth assistant turn than at the first, while the proportion labeled as OS is substantially lower for hesitant, indirect simulated users than for explicit, reassurance-seeking users. RELATE provides a reproducible framework and a sentence-level signal for auditing and steering the relational orientation of supportive LLMs.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.09569
PDF
-
ARCS: Towards Precise Text-to-SQL via Structured Disambiguation
2026-10-07 03:54:02Yihao Hu, Yanlin Feng, Naoki Otani, Nikita BhutaniAbstract
As text-to-SQL systems move beyond demonstrations toward real-world deployment, ambiguity in user questions becomes a primary source of errors. Such ambiguities are often subtle, domain- or data-specific, and can silently cause system outputs to deviate from the user's true intent. Ambiguity is traditionally addressed through conversational clarification, which is often inefficient, cognitively demanding, and poorly aligned with real-world user workflows. We propose structured disambiguation, a new paradigm in which ambiguity is resolved through explicit, constrained interactions rather than free-form dialogue. We construct ARCS (Ambiguity Resolution Corpus for SQL), the first text-to-SQL benchmark featuring naturally occurring, unconstrained ambiguities over real-world databases, with complete annotations of all valid ambiguity points, interpretations, and SQL queries. Experimental results show that text-to-SQL remains challenging in the presence of ambiguity: gpt-6-sol achieves only 51% end-to-end execution accuracy, and no open-source model exceeds 27%.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.09396
PDF
-
Multi-Objective Aligned Small Language Model Framework for SUD Patient Dialogue Generation
2026-10-06 23:10:21Thushara Manjari Naduvilakandy, Hyeju Jang, Mohammad Al HasanAbstract
Substance Use Disorder (SUD) counseling requires patient responses that reflect underlying cognitive states such as beliefs, coping strategies, and readiness for change. Although large language models (LLMs) can generate fluent text, they often fail to produce cognitively coherent and clinically realistic patient behavior, especially under ethical and data-scarce clinical settings. Moreover, deploying frontier-scale LLMs in healthcare applications presents practical challenges including high computational cost, latency, privacy concerns, and limited deployability in resource-constrained environments, motivating the need for cognitively aligned small language models (SLMs). We propose a cognitively grounded framework for SUD patient dialogue generation that explicitly models and aligns latent cognitive components with patient histories and counselor questions. Our pipeline consists of two stages: cognitive component detection and cognitive component-aligned dialogue generation. To enable effective learning with smaller models, we combine knowledge distillation from high-capacity teacher models, preference optimization from human-annotations, and attention-guided reward shaping. Extensive evaluations using automatic scores like BERTScore, ROUGE, METEOR and BLEU, and LLM-as-judge hit-metrics against both human and teacher-model references show that cognitively informed fine-tuning substantially improves cognitive realization and alignment over a generic instruction-tuned baselines and mental health domain specific SLMs, with particularly strong gains for open-ended cognitive components.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.09209
PDF
-
Noise Your Prompt: Noising Conditioning Tokens in Continuous Diffusion Language Models
2026-10-06 21:38:52Justin JungAbstract
We revisit a standard accepted practice in the continuous diffusion language model literature of fixing conditioning prompt tokens clean during training. We make a very simple modification: also noise the conditioning prompt tokens during training. We demonstrate that under this modified training objective, we achieve better generalization in combinatorial reasoning tasks such as Sudoku and N-Queens, with the largest gains on harder variants ($3.73\% \to 24.65\%$ solve rate on Sudoku Hard), and increased diversity of generated solutions ($50.60\% \to 73.79\%$ coverage on 10x10 N-Queens). We also show measurable improvements to natural language generation quality in modest dataset regimes with Gigaword summarization, but notably demonstrate that gains do not transfer to all natural language tasks (e.g open ended dialogue generation). Our method is a single line change to the training objective, requires no additional inference costs by default, and provides the flexibility of classifier-free guidance inspired guided sampling. Our \href{this https URL} {code} is publicly available.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.09145
PDF
-
Talking with Language Models
2026-10-06 20:12:52James Ravi Kirkpatrick, Alexandru Radulescu, Rachel Katharine SterkenAbstract
When we interact with large language models (LLMs), are we having a conversation? They are designed to invite us to treat them as intelligent interlocutors who remember, act, and make commitments. But appearances deceive. We introduce the artifactual stance, a framework that reconceives human-AI interaction as artifact-mediated exchanges of candidate texts. LLM outputs are candidate texts optimized for utility, not utterances bearing meaning or force. LLMs are sophisticated text generators, not speakers. Between sessions, nothing runs; between turns, no one remembers. What persists is a configuration and a transcript. The "conversation" is a user's solo performance, interpretive labour disguised by interface and artifact design. This shift dissolves recent philosophical puzzles. Questions about what 'I' and 'you' refer to in AI exchanges, about whether systems can lie or be held to promises, about the identity of our supposed interlocutors all rest on a false presupposition. There is no speaker behind the screen, hence no one to refer to, no one to hold responsible. What feels like dialogue with someone is interaction with an artifact that generates text at unprecedented scale and fit. By abandoning the conversational framing, we see these systems for what they are: immensely sophisticated artifacts that afford varied uses. The philosophical questions that matter are about the normative underpinnings of design, adoption, authorization, and human practices of use.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.09064
PDF
-
Toward Evidence-Driven Human-Agent-Robot Teaming for Earth-Independent Anomaly Triage
2026-10-06 18:03:09Ignacio G Lopez-Francos, Alexis Gallagher, Samira ShalalAbstract
Deep-space crews cannot rely on real-time ground support for urgent off-nominal events. Initial alerts may underdetermine cause, while discriminating evidence may reside in crew observations or at locations that are unsafe, costly, or unavailable for crew inspection. We present an evidence-driven architecture for human-agent-robot teaming in Earth-independent anomaly triage. Agentic AI is treated as a stateful coordinator over bounded, inspectable services rather than as a fully autonomous vehicle controller. A triage state manager maintains hypotheses, evidence provenance, uncertainty, operational context, and tool status; a crew-facing embodied agent elicits observations and explains assessment changes; and a mobile robot acquires targeted, localized evidence. Typed interfaces separate dialogue and orchestration from monitoring, robot command, context retrieval, and safety-critical control. Two scenarios illustrate the architecture: a crewed deep-space mission based on an actual ISS ammonia false alarm, where suspected contamination restricts crew access, and a power-interface anomaly at a crewed lunar base, where robotic inspection distinguishes a local connector fault from other causes ambiguous in remote telemetry. Our main contribution is an authority-bounded closed evidence-loop architecture, exercised in a hardware-in-the-loop integration prototype using Reachy Mini and an Innate MARS mobile robot.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.08933
PDF
-
Towards an Extensible Benchmark for Spoken Dialogue with Social Robots
2026-10-06 17:36:01Casey Kennington, Ross Mead, Saad Elbeleidy, Jesse ThomasonAbstract
Language models provide a plug-and-play interface between humans and robots, but important challenges remain when speech, dialogue, fast interaction, and collaboration are required. We propose a benchmark for the community to use as a way to explore common spoken dialogue artifacts between robots and humans, including requests for clarification, interruptions, embodied signals (e.g., head nods or facial cues), and time constraints. We also explain our vision to extend the benchmark for other aspects of human-robot interaction that are important to the larger research community. To facilitate the benchmark, we further propose using \textit{Retico}, a real-time communication framework that fulfills important technical requirements to enable robots to have spoken dialogue capabilities.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.08733
PDF
-
Agreement Is Not Validity: Cross-Model LLM Consensus in Diagnosing Student Failure Modes in K-12 Math Tutoring Dialogue
2026-10-06 17:16:03Clayton Cohn, Joyce Fonteles, Kirk Vanacore, Gianni Mazza, Candida Crawford, Tom Hooper, Gautam Biswas, Rene KizilcecAbstract
In K-12 mathematics tutoring, student-tutor dialogue provides rich evidence of learners' problem-solving processes and sources of difficulty. Learning analytics research increasingly relies on large language models (LLMs) to extract such information from dialogue for a variety of downstream tasks, including knowledge tracing, behavioral modeling, and diagnosis of student reasoning errors. However, the validity of these model-generated interpretations remains insufficiently understood. In this exploratory study, we examine the validity of LLM classifications of five student failure modes in mathematics tutoring dialogue using an operational diagnostic codebook: uncertainty, misattribution, operator selection, conceptual gap, and procedural slip. Across models, human-LLM agreement was moderate (kappa = .524-.597), while cross-model agreement was substantially higher (kappa = .755-.781; alpha = .769). These findings show that cross-model agreement can create a misleading appearance of correctness, challenging the assumption that consensus among LLMs constitutes evidence of valid learner interpretation. For learning analytics, the implication is clear: scalable labeling is useful only if the inferred constructs are valid, and model consensus cannot substitute for independent evidence of that validity.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.08703
PDF
