Recommendation
-
Positioning manuscripts in the scientific landscape with agentic AI
2026-09-12 07:10:14Jiawen Chen, Zichen Zhang, Bingxuan Li, Quan Sun, Yiyan Zhang, Edric Tam, Jinjie Lin, Didong Li, Yun Li, Bingxin ZhaoAbstract
Publishing a research manuscript is a routine yet demanding part of scientific life: time-consuming, stressful, and often uncertain in outcome. Recent advances in large language model (LLM)-based agentic AI have shown promise across a range of scientific tasks, and here we ask whether agentic AI can help researchers navigate the publication process itself by reliably inferring a manuscript's eventual publication venue from its content and literature context. We introduce PASS (Publication-oriented Agentic Scientific System), an agentic system that understands manuscripts within their domain-specific literature context and predicts top-matched publication venues. PASS positions each manuscript within its surrounding literature landscape by reconstructing its local scientific neighborhood, tracing its topic trajectory, and reasoning over field-specific journal spaces. Evaluated on a leakage-audited benchmark of over 2,000 preprints across 16 biomedical fields, PASS achieved Top-1 accuracy of 50.3% and Top-5 accuracy of 86.1%, outperforming state-of-the-art LLM baselines and established journal-selection tools. PASS-produced quality scores, such as impact potential and novelty, aligned with independent measures of publication outcome. We also found that the designed literature retrieval module is the strongest performance contributor, particularly for positioning manuscripts relative to nearby work, and that PASS maintained near-full performance from the abstract alone, whereas LLM baselines required the full manuscript text. An independent human evaluation found strong researcher agreement with PASS's manuscript understanding and recommendation rationale. PASS has been released as a public platform (this https URL) for broad researcher access.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.13760
PDF
-
Safety as a Constraint: Fine-Tuning a LLM Recommender to Explain Itself
2026-09-12 02:28:08Jiashu He, Emma Yanyang Kong, JJ Tan, David FagnanAbstract
Traditional recommender systems are typically trained to predict what item users will interact with next, but not why. However, offering personalized evidence for why a user might like the predicted item is an important way to enhance the service and to raise the likelihood that the user will be genuinely interested in the recommendation. This service can be delivered by integrating a frontier-model call into the member-facing pipeline, but it will add extra cost and latency. In this paper, we train a recommender LLM to generate personalized explanations for its reccomendation, based on the user's watching history at a large video streaming service. We impose two requirements on the generated explanation: it must be faithful to the elements of the shows it links, and it must be strictly non-harmful to the user. To this end, we first train two LLM-judge reward models covering three specific criteria, and propose constrained GRPO to incorporate these different criteria. On a held-out real-world testing set, our fine-tuned model improves the all-three-criteria PASS rate rises from 0.649 to 0.956 under our own judges and from 0.677 to 0.931 under an independent judge, where as the frontier generator performs similar to the untuned recommender baseline. We conduct further experiments to show that the model's language and recommendation abilities remain unchanged. Based on these results, we conclude that an LLM-based recommender can be fine-tuned on other complex tasks without compromising its original recommendation performance, thus provide insights for further agentic user interface powered by a single model.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.13657
PDF
-
Parameter Sensitivity Analysis for Aerial LiDAR-Inertial Odometries in low-altitude flights
2026-09-11 13:31:48Robert Milijas, Jose Ramiro Martinez-de Dios, Stjepan BogdanAbstract
LiDAR-based SLAM (Simultaneous Localization and Mapping) and LIO (LiDAR-inertial odometry) algorithms are often used for precise navigation of unmanned aerial vehicles, especially during interactions with the aerial robot's environment. However, the performance of these algorithms is greatly dependent on the scenario, LiDAR, and robot motion characteristics, often requiring an intensive tuning process to achieve the desired performance. To aid these tuning efforts, this paper analyzes the influence on performance of the parameters of an EKF-based LIO algorithm (FAST-LIO2) and the LIO module of a graph-based SLAM algorithm (Cartographer) on aerial LiDAR SLAM datasets recorded using different LiDARs in low-to-moderate-altitude flights in diverse environments. The analysis is conducted on the absolute trajectory error (ATE) resulting from processing the datasets with the LIO algorithms configured with each combination of parameters obtained in an exhaustive grid search. The relationship between individual parameters and the ATE results is assessed using Pearson's correlation, while the influence of each parameter is assessed using random forest permutation importance analyses with random forest models trained to predict the resulting ATE values based on the choice of parameters. The performed analysis obtains for Cartographer and FAST-LIO2: i) the identification of parameters with stronger influence in performance, ii) a simplified tuning procedure, and iii) tuning recommendations. Using the proposed tuning recommendations, both algorithms obtain on the analyzed datasets ATE values within 5 cm to the optimal performance found in the grid search procedure in 94% of the analyzed cases.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.12837
PDF
-
Generative Marketing Mix Modeling: A Causal Inference Framework Linking GEO and GEM to Business Impact
2026-09-10 17:57:28Masahiro Kato, Daiki Honma, Taka KatoAbstract
Generative artificial intelligence changes how firms reach customers, but standard marketing data do not record how often users see and notice a firm's name in generated answers. We develop Generative Marketing Mix Modeling (GMMM) to estimate the causal effects of Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) and Generative Engine Marketing (GEM). For GEO, GMMM combines repeated generated answers with question counts, shares of use across generative systems, and notice probabilities. For GEM, it combines records of sponsored placements with notice probabilities. GMMM compares expected business responses under alternative treatment sequences and establishes sufficient conditions for identifying the resulting effects. We investigate the empirical performance of the proposed method using simulated answers to product recommendation in English and Japanese.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.11915
PDF
-
On the Regularization Landscape for the Linear Recommendation Models
2026-09-10 17:45:06Dong Li, Zhenming Liu, Ruoming Jin, Hao Zhou, Zhi Liu, Jing Gao, Bin RenAbstract
Recently, a wide range of recommendation algorithms inspired by deep learning techniques have emerged as the performance leaders on several standard recommendation benchmarks. While these algorithms were built on different DL techniques (e.g., dropouts, autoencoder), they have similar performance and even similar cost functions. This paper studies whether the models' comparable performance are sheer coincidence, or they can be unified under a single framework. We find that all linear performance leaders effectively add only a nuclear-norm based regularizer, or a Frobenius-norm based regularizer. The former ones possess a (surprising) rigid structure that limits the models' predictive power but their solutions are low rank and have closed form. The latter ones are more expressive and more efficient for recommendation but their solutions are either full-rank or require executing hard-to-tune numeric procedures such as ADMM. Along this line of finding, we further propose two low-rank, closed-form solutions, derived from carefully generalizing Frobenius-norm based regularizers. The new solutions get the best of both nuclear-norm and Frobenius-norm world.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.11876
PDF
-
Cognitive Digital Twins: Ethical Risks and Governance for AI Systems That Model the Mind
2026-09-10 10:11:14Vamshi Krishna Bonagiri, Juan Nicolas Sepulveda-Arias, Abdoul Jalil Djiberou Mahamadou, Monojit ChoudhuryAbstract
As AI systems become increasingly persistent and personalized, they make possible a class of technologies that we call cognitive digital twins (CDTs): dynamic computational representations of a specific person's cognition, updated from behavioral, contextual, or physiological data in order to model, predict, or simulate that person's cognition, or to act as that person's communicative or decision-making proxy. CDTs combine cognitive inference with longitudinal representation, simulation, and proxy action in ways that existing governance strategies for personal assistants, autonomous agents, recommender systems, and automated decision systems only partially address. This paper makes four contributions. First, we define CDTs and distinguish them from adjacent systems. Second, we introduce a 5A governance framework organized around authority, autonomy, access and control, accountability, and availability. Third, we identify CDT-specific risks, from misrepresentation and epistemic authority shifts to shadow twins, simulated participation, proxy action, and proxy-power asymmetries. Fourth, we analyze governance gaps and propose requirements for high-risk CDTs that strengthen consent, purpose limitation, validity, traceability, contestation, independent review, and model retirement. Existing frameworks primarily regulate data processing, automated decisions, or autonomous actions; CDTs also require governance at the level of cognitive representation itself, before any final decision or external action occurs. We argue that CDTs require governance not only because they can act for people, but because they can become infrastructures through which cognition is represented, simulated, classified, and operationalized.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.23094
PDF
-
Assessing the Reusability of Public Speech Resources for Low-Resource Languages: A Central Kurdish Case Study
Abstract
Kurdish is spoken by millions of people, but little technology can read it aloud. A recent study released three Kurdish voices, 35 hours of recorded speech, and a paper describing the work, all free to download. This review checks how well those public files match the paper. The research is careful about its limits, but the files contain several problems: a settings file lists equipment that was never used, test recordings are left unlabeled among training data, and a coding fault mishandles long numbers. The download page also claims a stronger result than the paper reports and recommends one voice for general use. That recommendation matters because Kurdish has major regional and written variation, while these voices were built from three people reading prepared texts. The process therefore removes much everyday and regional speech. English and German benefit from long traditions of dictionaries and linguistic description that help identify wrong pronunciations; Kurdish has far less such support, so software choices can go unchecked. The voices sound fluent, but they represent the reading styles of their speakers rather than Kurdish as a whole. Most of these issues can be fixed using information the team already has, without changing the reported results. Better records would mainly make the work easier for others, especially community linguists, to check and reuse. The license is the main exception: whether audiobook owners allow corrected versions to be shared will affect whether future Kurdish voices can build on this work or must start again.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.11246
PDF
-
Is artificial intelligence reorienting archaeological methods?
2026-09-10 08:08:15Lorenzo Cardarelli, Roberto RagnoAbstract
Generative AI and the practice of "vibe coding" are changing how archaeologists carry out computational research, but their effects on the discipline's range of methods is still understudied. In this paper, we evaluate whether large language models (LLMs) are narrowing the variety of methods archaeologists use. We first analysed approximately 119,000 archaeology abstracts from Scopus, covering publications from 2010 to 2025. Using a locally run LLM, we identified the computational methods reported in each abstract and organised them into 25 broad categories (L2) and 241 finer clusters (L3). A Bayesian Dirichlet-multinomial model of method composition within sub-disciplines found a small but credible shift in method use after 2023. However, this shift was smaller than the variation already present across the full study period. No individual technique showed a significant change, and overall methodological diversity increased rather than declined. We then ran a controlled experiment to see whether LLMs recommend a narrower set of methods than archaeologists have used in practice. Two different open-weight models were asked to suggest methods for 28 archaeological research problems, with prompts providing three levels of methodological guidance: novice, intermediate, and expert. Recommendation diversity was much lower than in the published literature, particularly without methodological guidance. The models also tended to favour methods that were widely used before 2023, and their recommendations more closely resembled the post-2023 literature. Taken together, these results are consistent with LLMs pushing methodological choice towards convergence, although our study cannot establish a causal effect. They raise a broader question: how can archaeology retain methodological diversity as LLMs become more involved in research?
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.11198
PDF
-
Limitations of Automated Simulatability: LLM Simulators Can Bypass Explanations
2026-09-10 08:02:41Antonin Poch\'e, Fanny Jourdan, Nils Feldhus, Qianli Wang, Jing Yang, Simon Ostermann, Nicholas Asher, Philippe Muller, Vera SchmittAbstract
Simulatability is an evaluation protocol for explanations that quantifies their usefulness by how well they help a user predict a task model's outputs. Since human evaluation is costly, automated simulatability replaces human explainees with LLM simulators, as proposed in ConSim (Poché et al., 2025) for large-scale experiments. We qualitatively replicate and extend ConSim's ranking of explanation methods across the tested datasets, explanation families, and simulator LLMs, and identify two limitations. First, when class names are meaningful, simulators can obtain high simulatability by solving the classification task directly, without relying on the explanations. Second, class anonymization can reward explanations for leaking the hidden label mapping, a limitation we expose with a new classes-as-concepts baseline. These results are consistent with a shortcut hypothesis: in the tested settings, simulator predictions mainly rely on task priors, while explanations produce small changes. We derive recommendations for more robust automated simulatability evaluations.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.08585
PDF
-
How AI Coders Discuss, Disagree, and Reach Consensus: Challenges and Opportunities for LLM-Based Qualitative Coding
Abstract
The utility of AI in multi-coder qualitative coding has been widely discussed, yet little empirical evidence exists to delineate the contexts in which it performs reliably. We address this gap by quantifying the effectiveness of multi-agent LLM coding across varied qualitative datasets, revealing key contextual and structural factors that mediate coding outcomes. We developed a literature-informed baseline pipeline that enables AI agents to independently code, debate, and reconcile disagreements. Results revealed that coding accuracy depends on factors such as codebook length, qualitative data similarity, and agent disagreement. Notably, intense and unresolved debates between agents led to higher accuracy. Our analysis showed that while LLMs emulate many human discussion behaviors, they lack adaptive responsiveness to context. From these findings, we offer design recommendations for building automated coding systems. Our open-source AI discussion dataset and methodological framework lay the groundwork for advancing the design of AI-mediated automated thematic analysis.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.11109
PDF
-
Meta-Learning for Classifier Selection in Image Datasets: A Feature-Driven Framework for Accuracy Prediction
2026-09-10 03:39:16Zahra Nabizadeh_Shahre_Babak, Farzaneh Koohestani, Nader Karimi, Shahram Shirani, Shadrokh SamaviAbstract
No Free Lunch theorem implies that any performance gains achieved by a classifier on a particular image distribution are necessarily offset by a loss of performance over the set of all possible problems; thus, no single model is universally optimal. Selecting the most suitable classifier for image datasets is a critical yet challenging task due to the intrinsic complexity and diversity of images. This paper proposes a meta-learning framework that leverages a comprehensive set of meta-features capturing dataset complexity to predict classifier performance without exhaustive training. By extracting and selecting features using methods such as autoencoders, pre-trained networks, and dimensionality reduction techniques, we train regression models to efficiently estimate classifier accuracies. Additionally, clustering techniques are employed to group classifiers with similar performance patterns, simplifying the recommendation process. The datasets used span a wide range of concepts, including nature, animals, numbers, motorcycles, medical images, and human bodies, to ensure broad generalization. Evaluated on 56 diverse image datasets, our approach achieves an average ranking prediction accuracy exceeding 86%, demonstrating its effectiveness in guiding model selection. This scalable and interpretable framework provides a practical solution to improve classification performance while reducing computational costs.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.11041
PDF
-
Auto-RecSys: Harnessing Autonomous Research Agents for Industry-Scale Recommender System
2026-09-10 00:09:18Ming Li, Dai Li, Xuying Ning, Bo Sun, Rui Li, Yi Zhang, Silvia Gong, Xuan Cao, Rui Li, Cornelia Carapcea, Qunshu Zhang, Zhigang Wang, Yinglong Xia, Andy WangAbstract
Auto-research agents have shown the potential to automate hypothesis generation, experiment execution, and iterative refinement. However, scaling this paradigm to industry-scale recommendation models introduces two challenges: (1) long feedback loops, where model training can take days, making serial iteration prohibitively slow and requiring parallel exploration across multiple research directions; and (2) system complexity, where large configurations, fragile infrastructure dependencies, and multi-day GPU jobs require robust and recoverable execution. We present Auto-RecSys, an autonomous research system for long-horizon experimentation on industry-scale recommendation models. Auto-RecSys addresses these challenges through three harness designs: (1) distributed asynchronous execution for running multiple experiments in parallel across servers, (2) centralized cross-server memory for persistent and recoverable execution across sessions and failures, and (3) cognitive-procedural separation, where natural-language skill files guide LLM reasoning while deterministic scripts enforce operational correctness. Auto-RecSys further employs a dual-loop self-evolving architecture: an Execution Evolution Loop in which model-specific playbooks accumulate operational knowledge by recording failed attempts and crystallizing successful pipelines, and an Idea Evolution Loop in which experimental outcomes inform subsequent ideation. Evaluated on recommendation models, Auto-RecSys significantly reduces the human time required per experiment cycle and improves execution reliability as its playbooks mature.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.10922
PDF
-
Towards a Deterministic Math Solver for Clinical Language Models
2026-09-09 18:22:44Felipe Ocampo Osorio, Sebasti\'an Andr\'es Cajas Ordo\~nez, Maximin Lange, Rafi Al Attrach, Sahil Kapadia, Zakaria Laouabdia Sellami, Angelo Antonio Talio, Leo Anthony CeliAbstract
Large language models are unreliable at arithmetic, which is a problem for clinical calculators where a single numerical error changes the recommendation. The standard response is to hardcode each calculator as a validated function, one at a time. We test an alternative: the model does not calculate. Instead, it writes case-specific Python that a restricted local executor runs as a deterministic solver, and the model's task reduces to deciding how to use it. We evaluate this Program-Solve interface on MedCalc-Bench Verified (1,100 cases, 55 calculators) against direct model arithmetic and a hand-written 22-calculator library, using Qwen2.5-7B and Qwen2.5-32B-AWQ, after auditing the benchmark's formulas against current clinical guidelines and flagging 16 of 55 with version, use or coefficient concerns. With formulas and gold variables supplied and both routes reading the whole note, handing off to the solver is not a reliable advantage at 7B (75.31% against 72.02%, a paired +3.29 points with a 95% calculator-cluster interval of [-3.49, 10.38]) but is one at 32B (90.53% against 83.47%, +7.05 [0.47, 14.60], clear of zero). The hand-written library is exact on its 440 supported cases but abstains elsewhere (40.0% overall). Adding an executor thus helps some open-weight models more than others even under matched formula, variable and note access, and is not a substitute for verified formulas or reliable variable extraction either way.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.10728
PDF
-
CT-SAFR: Safe and Interpretable Chain-of-Thought Reasoning for Autonomous Robots: A Multi-Layered Verification Framework for Trustworthy AI-Driven Robotic Decision Making
Abstract
Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting enables LLMs to perform explicit, step-by-step reasoning, creating opportunities for sophisticated autonomous robots. However, recent research reveals that reasoning models verbalize their actual decision processes only 25-39% of the time, with faithfulness degrading 44% on complex tasks. This paper presents CT-SAFR (Chain-of-Thought Safety and Faithfulness for Robotics), a multi-layered verification framework achieving 94.2% hallucination detection (n = 500, 95% CI: 91.8-95.9%) with sub-500ms latency. Through a warehouse robot case study, this work demonstrates 87% reduction in unsafe reasoning outputs (p < 0.001) and provides recommendations for responsible deployment of reasoning-capable autonomous robots.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.09692
PDF
-
PRAGMA: Evaluating Personalized Guidance with Memory Alignment in Lifelong Conversations
2026-09-09 03:31:47Hyojeong Yu, Hyukhun Koh, Minsung Kim, Yunah Jang, Kyomin JungAbstract
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as personalized assistants that interact with users over extended periods of time. As conversations grow longer, relying on full interaction histories becomes increasingly inefficient and unreliable: long contexts introduce substantial computational overhead, making it difficult for models to consistently identify and utilize the most relevant information for the current request. These challenges have motivated memory systems that structure and retrieve user-specific information. In realistic interactions, users often seek practical guidance such as recommendations, planning, and decision support. Unlike factual recall tasks, personalized guidance requires models to integrate information across multiple past conversations and reason about changing user preferences and experiences. However, existing conversational memory evaluations mainly focus on retrieval and factual recall. To study this challenge, we introduce PRAGMA, a benchmark for evaluating personalized guidance in long-term conversations. PRGAMA contains curated longitudinal conversation histories, evidence annotations, and guidance scenarios grounded in evolving user contexts and incorrect user assumptions. Experiments across retrieval systems, memory systems, and long-context models reveal that current systems struggle both to recover the appropriate conversational evidence and to effectively use it for personalized guidance. Our results highlight the need for memory architectures that support robust conversational retrieval and memory-grounded reasoning beyond evidence recall.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.09664
PDF
-
An Efficient and Effective Agentic Group Shilling Attack on Recommender Systems
2026-09-09 00:14:03Quoc Viet Nguyen, Trinh Pham, Viet Huynh, Hongzhi Yin, Quoc Viet Hung Nguyen, Bay Vo, Thanh Tam NguyenAbstract
Recommender systems have become core infrastructure for modern online platforms, personalizing content at scale and strongly influencing what users see, click on, and purchase. However, this dependence on user interaction also exposes them to shilling attacks, where malicious actors can inject fake profiles to distort item rankings and control visibility. Existing attacks often rely on target-specific fine-tuning or fixed profile templates, making them either difficult to adapt to different victims or easier to detect. To overcome these limitations, we propose the Agentic Group Attack System (AGAS), a coordinated shilling framework where a central Coordinator directs a group of role-switching worker agents to adaptively promote a target item across different victim families. The Coordinator dynamically adjusts the strategy when progress stalls or suppression signals increase, while workers pursue a shared objective and switch between active and inactive roles to avoid repetitive patterns. Under the same attack budgets and evaluation protocols, AGAS consistently surpasses strong baselines in target promotion while better preserving benign recommendation quality, weakening representative detectors, and achieving higher efficiency than prior attacks. These findings also emphasize that defending recommender systems may require mechanisms that can handle adaptive shilling campaigns, not just isolated fake-profile injections. Our code is available at this https URL.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.09551
PDF
-
MoEMB: Scaling Universal Multimodal Embeddings with Efficient Mixture-of-Experts Models
2026-09-08 12:29:50Xuanming Cui, Shlok Kumar Mishra, Wentao Bao, Aashu Singh, Zihao Wang, Xiangjun Fan, Jun Xiao, Ser-Nam Lim, Jianpeng ChengAbstract
Universal multimodal embedding (UME) increasingly demands encoder's capacity for handling a broad range of tasks and modalities with increased complexity. Prior scaling methods either increase the representation size, retrieval effort, or scales the encoder into a heavy multimodal LLM. Recent works, such as Think-Then-Embed (TTE), explore scaling via reasoning tokens. However, embedding models are hard to scale up: increasing parameters directly tradeoffs for the large training batch size that contrastive learning needs, and retrieval has to be served under tight latency. Moreover, UME tasks are diverse in complexity, where scaling up embedders can bring significant redundant computation. In this work, we propose MOEMB, which instead scales UME along the expert axis through mixture-of-experts (MoE), growing encoder capacity while preserving single-vector, non-autoregressive encoding. Through a systematic study of the design space and training recipes for MoE-based UME, MoEMB sets a new state of the art on both MMEB-V2 and MRMR among models trained on public MMEB-family data: with only 3B active parameters, MoEMB surpasses TTE-based methods with >4x active parameters, using significantly less computes. To further improve the scalability and efficiency, we conduct the first comprehensive study of adaptive computation for MoE-based embedding, spanning diverse strategies across training-based and inference-only methods. Together, these results support expert scaling as an effective and efficient direction for UME, with adaptive computation further improving efficiency for MLLM-based embedding models towards large-scale retrieval and recommendation systems.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.08663
PDF
-
SequenceO1: End-to-End Ultra-Long Sequence Modeling in Recommendation with Low-Rank Caching
2026-09-08 08:49:44Lin Guan, Jia-Qi Yang, Zhishan Zhao, Jiaqi Huang, Hangyu Wang, Longbin Li, Beichuan Zhang, Haonan Jiang, Jinan Ni, Xiangyu Fan, Xiaowen Li, Ziyao Ren, Yuhang Qi, Xiaolong Zhu, Xuanyuan Luo, Qiwei Chen, Yi Cheng, Lele YuAbstract
Modeling long-term user behavior is central to sequential recommendation and billion-scale industrial recommender systems, yet production ranking models operate under strict latency, memory, communication, and training-throughput constraints. At the 100K scale, the challenge extends beyond attention complexity: raw sequence features must be stored, transferred, and repeatedly processed during training and online serving. Existing approaches based on history truncation, multi-stage behavior retrieval, compressed lifelong histories, or train-short/infer-long extrapolation either weaken end-to-end optimization or retain substantial length-dependent cost. We present SequenceO1, an end-to-end framework for ultra-long user behavior sequence modeling, deployed at full traffic on Douyin with histories of up to 100K interactions. SequenceO1 follows a compress-then-reason design. Its Sketch Attention (SA) uses learnable prototypes and prototype-wise normalization to compress the raw history into a fixed-size, target-agnostic user representation. Target-conditioned Stacked Target-to-History Cross Attention (STCA) then models complementary time scales: a recent 10K suffix for short-term interests and the compact sketch for long-term preferences. To make training and inference practical, SequenceO1 combines low-rank user representation caching, multi-request user-level batching, pipeline lift, and a fused FlashSA kernel to amortize feature storage, communication, and computation across targets, training instances, and consecutive requests. Production experiments show consistent offline and online gains, while the compact cached sketch retains most of the benefit of directly scaling end-to-end sequence ranking to 100K. These results provide a practical model-system approach to efficient attention, sequence compression, and scalable long-sequence and long-context recommendation systems.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.08443
PDF
-
Agentic ML Exploration for Ads Ranking
2026-09-08 04:48:03Erwin Gao, Vinodh Kumar Sunkara, Jingyi Guan, Qinjin Jia, Hangjun Xu, Xiang Ji, Sherman Wong, Surya Teja Chavali, Pratik Vaishnavi, Aryan Pandhi, Xiaoyu Deng, Zhaodong Wang, Samarth Inani, Fan Yang, Jakob Moberg, Zoe Zu, Nicolas Bievre, Sami Khenissi, Amit Jaspal, Ehsan Fakharizadi, Srinidhi Viswanathan, Dorothy Sun, Abishek Vanam, Sneha Iyer, Sheela Yadawad, Wenjie Chen, Gaby Nahum, Junhua Gu, Peter Chu, Yucheng Liu, Xin Zhao, Vitor Cid, Chaorong Chen, Vijay Pappu, Ashwin Kumar, Wenlin Chen, Ben Schulte, Deepak Chandra, Ritwik TewariAbstract
Modern industrial ads ranking stacks are increasingly bottlenecked not by model capacity or training compute, but by the throughput of human ML iteration - the cycles of research, implementation, training, debugging, evaluation, and launch required to surface a single statistically significant improvement. A typical ranking stack contains numerous differentiated models with heterogeneous data, architectures, and infrastructure constraints, and each cycle takes days to weeks of senior engineer attention per model. As a result, techniques that have proven effective on one model diffuse into others slowly and unevenly, leaving substantial recoverable signal unexplored. We present Agentic ML Exploration (A-MLE), an autonomous LLM-agent system that systematically explores ML techniques across a portfolio of ads ranking models. A-MLE decomposes ML iteration into five stages involving hypothesis generation, exploration strategy, experiment execution, result analysis and shared knowledge substrate which are orchestrated by a single agent that invokes domain-specific skills and agentic workflows against a sandboxed execution layer, with human-in-the-loop checkpoints at each stage boundary. We deploy A-MLE across a representative set of large-scale ads ranking models and evaluate it along a tiered capability framework (tool availability, autonomous workflow execution, and open-ended exploration). We further report a controlled cross-LLM study using a fixed agent loop, which surfaces qualitative differences in execution reliability and exploration aggressiveness across the Claude Sonnet, Gemini, and GPT families. We discuss failure modes and the design choices that govern reliability. Our findings suggest that agentic exploration is a practical force multiplier for ML engineers in industrial recommenders, especially for the long tail of models that rarely receive expert attention.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.08248
PDF
-
Quantifying the Engagement Trap: Impact of Short-form Video Recommender Systems on Users with ADHD
2026-09-07 17:38:48Vedad Misirlic, Gregor Mayr, Elisabeth LexAbstract
Short-form video platforms use recommender systems to maximize engagement through highly efficient personalized recommendations. However, the impact of these recommendations on users with ADHD compared to users without ADHD remains underexplored. Through this study, we introduce and operationalize the Engagement Trap, illustrating how recommender systems, while successfully optimizing for engagement, disproportionately disadvantage users with ADHD. This stratified study of 302 participants, recruited via the online platform Prolific, compares experiences between participants with and without ADHD. Our results show that while recommendations are perceived as relevant across groups, participants with ADHD report significantly higher levels of time blindness, post-usage regret, and emotional distress when consuming recommendations. Moreover, we collect feedback for several proof-of- concept, theoretical design interventions for neuro-inclusive design principles. These findings provide quantitative evidence of systemic differences in engagement-optimized recommender systems and highlight the unbalanced negative effects and interactions these systems create for participants with ADHD. We argue for neurodiversity-aware, human-centered design approaches that mitigate such algorithmic harms and support more equitable experiences.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.07795
PDF
