Survey
-
Information Discernment in Large Language Models
2026-05-22 12:13:16Joshua Ashkinaze, Laura Kurek, Alina Faisal, Tongyuan Miao, Mariam Joseph, Ceren Budak, Eric GilbertAbstract
LLMs are increasingly used with external knowledge sources like the internet. Do they weigh information appropriately -- updating more for reliable sources (source discernment) and more when claims bring priors closer to the truth (truth discernment)? We formalize this as information discernment and introduce Learn2Discern (L2D), an experimental framework and benchmark grounded in three normative axioms with interpretable metrics. To establish external validity, a pre-registered, quota-matched user study (n=299) confirms that real LLM users endorse all three axioms and report that violations reduce their trust and usage intent. Across 13 models and nearly 670K trials, we find consistent failures across both dimensions: models perform near chance on source and truth discernment, rely on source popularity twice as much as source reliability, and update roughly equally whether a claim improves or worsens their position relative to the ground truth. Models integrate external knowledge most effectively on datasets where their priors are already the most accurate. Newer and larger models improve truth discernment but not source discernment, a blind spot that model complexity does not address. We identify simple inference-time interventions that improve both forms of discernment. We release our dataset and survey as a testbed for a core alignment property that scales in importance as LLMs replace traditional search.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.19355
PDF
-
Tackling Multimodal Learning Challenges with Mixture-of-Expert: A Survey
2026-05-22 05:01:21Liangwei Nathan Zheng, Wei Emma Zhang, Olaf Maennel, Lin Yue, Weitong ChenAbstract
Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) presents a naturally compatible and scalable framework for multimodal learning, demonstrating strong adaptability across diverse modalities and tasks. Despite its growing success, a comprehensive and systematic review on the MoE metho addressing multimodal challenges remains lacking. Existing surveys tend to evaluate either multimodal learning or MoE independently from method taxonomy, overlooking the unique interplay between them. This survey fills that gap by answering a central question: \textit{How does MoE effectively resolve multimodal challenges?} We approach this from three key perspectives: (1) \textbf{MoE as an Efficient Multimodal Engine:} enabling scalable multimodal modeling by decoupling computational cost from parameter growth and mitigating modality redundancy through selective expert activation; (2) \textbf{MoE as a Multimodal Representation Learner:} integrating complementary multi-opinion expert knowledge to enrich alignment and interaction representations; and (3) \textbf{MoE as a Multimodal Adapter:} providing a modular and flexible mechanism to model imperfect data scenarios such as modality imbalance and missing modality. Through our extensive literature review, we identify critical research gaps, including interpretable routing, expert communication, modality integration, and lifelong multimodal learning. We position this survey as a foundation for future research toward interpretable and sustainable multimodal Mixture-of-Experts system.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.27431
PDF
-
Federated Learning over Human-Body Communication for On-Body Edge Intelligence: A Survey, Taxonomy, and BODYFED-HBC Scheduling Vignette
Abstract
Human-body communication (HBC) is a promising physical substrate for wearable body-area networks because it can localize communication around the body and reduce the burden of conventional radio links. Federated learning (FL) is a promising learning substrate because it can reduce raw-data centralization for physiological and behavioral sensing. Yet these two literatures remain weakly connected: FL for wearables usually abstracts the communication layer, whereas HBC research usually abstracts learning and model-update traffic. This article surveys the intersection of HBC, wireless body-area networks, wearable FL, Internet-of-Bodies privacy, and edge-intelligence optimization. We propose a taxonomy that distinguishes intra-body, body-hub, cross-user, and clinical-cloud FL deployments, and we identify the open problem of body-channel-aware FL: learning protocols whose client selection, update compression, and aggregation are controlled by posture-dependent HBC links, residual energy, sensor memory, and privacy risk. To make the research agenda concrete, we introduce BODYFED-HBC as a reference architecture and provide an optimization formulation and scheduling algorithm. We further specify a reproducible simulation vignette that combines public wearable datasets with empirical body-coupled-communication signal-loss models. The article concludes with open datasets, evaluation metrics, limitations, and research directions for computer scientists working above the hardware layer.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.24062
PDF
-
AutoResearch AI: Towards AI-Powered Research Automation for Scientific Discovery
2026-05-22 03:40:30Guiyao Tie, Jiawen Shi, Dingjie Song, Yixiao Huang, Ziji Sheng, Xueyang Zhou, Daizong Liu, Pan Zhou, Yongchao Chen, Ran Xu, Lifang He, Qingsong Wen, Manling Li, Cong Lu, Shuai Li, Pengtao Xie, Yixuan Yuan, Rui Meng, Lei Xing, Lichao Sun, Caiming Xiong, Philip S. Yu, Jianfeng GaoAbstract
Scientific research is being reshaped by AI systems that move beyond isolated assistance toward longer-horizon workflows spanning literature grounding, hypothesis generation, experimentation, validation, reporting, and revision. This shift marks a transition from task-level AI for science to workflow-level research automation. Yet current systems remain fragmented, differing in autonomy, domain scope, execution environment, validation mechanism, and human oversight, while still struggling with evidence preservation, reproducibility, weak-direction rejection, provenance tracking, cross-domain robustness, and accountable scientific closure. This survey examines these developments through AutoResearch, defined as the developmental spectrum of AI-powered scientific workflow automation. Within it, Vibe Research denotes the human-steered region of prompt-based assistance and human-verified execution, whereas emerging AI-led systems coordinate larger portions of the discovery loop without achieving robust autonomy. We analyze how research systems redistribute control, evidence, execution, validation, and accountability across workflows and organize the field around five workflow conditions: literature and research grounding; hypothesis formation and planning; experimentation and tool use; feedback, validation, and review; and reporting and knowledge communication. We further synthesize AI scientist systems, mixed-initiative co-research frameworks, benchmarks, domain deployments, and open-source infrastructures. Finally, we propose five evaluation dimensions--novelty, validity, impact, reliability, and provenance--and show that AutoResearch autonomy is domain-conditioned, being more credible in structured, executable, and rapidly verifiable settings but limited in embodied, delayed, heterogeneous, ethical, or institutionally accountable contexts.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.23204
PDF
-
CultivAgents: Cultivating Relationship-Centered Multi-Agent Systems for Personalized Gardening
2026-05-22 03:20:04Yiyang Wang, Moeiini Reilly, Britney Johnson, Kefei Yan, Alex Cabral, Josiah HesterAbstract
Gardening is critical to support well-being, cultural continuity, and food autonomy, yet existing digital tools often provide generic advice that overlooks gardeners' skills, local ecologies, seasons, and cultural contexts. We introduce CultivAgents, a relationship-centered multi-agent system for personalized, socio-culturally grounded gardening support. Grounded in ethics of care, CultivAgents coordinates multiple specialized agents: an Experience Agent that adapts guidance to users' skill levels, an Environmental Agent that grounds advice in local and seasonal conditions, and an Ethnobotanical Agent that connects plants to cultural knowledge and histories. We evaluated CultivAgents through a three-phase mixed-methods study with domain experts (n=3), HCI researchers (n=7), and community gardeners (n=5), analyzing expert feedback, pre/post surveys, and participatory design activities. Results suggest that CultivAgents helped gardeners translate interest into situated action: community gardeners reported increased confidence (3.00 to 3.60), motivation (4.00 to 4.40), and trust in acting on AI advice (3.20 to 4.00). Participants valued hyperlocal ecological guidance and complementary agent perspectives, while also identifying limits in cultural specificity, ecological grounding, and agent coordination. The work advances relationship-centered AI, offering design implications for multi-agent systems that support food sovereignty, community resilience, and cultural preservation.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.23193
PDF
-
A Comparative Evaluation of Structural Topic Models and BERTopic for Short, Open-Ended Survey Responses
Abstract
Topic modeling in applied psychology increasingly spans two methodological traditions: probabilistic bag-of-words models and newer embedding-based approaches. Yet many evaluations of these methods rely on longer and cleaner benchmark corpora, leaving less guidance for short, open-ended survey responses. This paper compares Structural Topic Models (STM), a probabilistic topic model, and BERTopic, an embedding-based model, for analyzing open-ended survey responses. We evaluated three STM conditions and five BERTopic conditions, varying typographical correction, stemming, embedding choice, and contextual augmentation, a strategy we introduced to provide additional semantic context for very short responses. Results indicate that BERTopic consistently produced higher topic coherence than STM, with contextual augmentation yielding the strongest performance gains. In contrast, higher-dimensional embeddings alone did not improve coherence and were associated with greater data loss. Qualitative evaluation showed that BERTopic generated more interpretable and stable topics, while STM topics were often broader and more mixed. However, STM provides stronger support for inferential covariate analysis, whereas BERTopic covariate comparisons are primarily descriptive. These findings suggest that STM and BERTopic offer complementary strengths. We conclude with practical guidance for selecting and combining topic modeling approaches in applied social science research.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.23093
PDF
-
Whose Good, Whose Place? The Moral Geography of Agentic AI for Social Good
2026-05-21 19:49:27Poli Nemkova, Haeshitha Indukuri, Jaedon CharlesAbstract
Agentic AI systems are increasingly proposed for social-good domains, often invoking the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) as a vocabulary of global benefit. Yet claims of social good do not establish accountability to the communities a system claims to serve. We present a structured survey of 112 papers on agentic AI for social good published between 2015 and 2026. We find a moral-geographic asymmetry: papers are least likely to specify geographic context in precisely the domains where local political, legal, and cultural context matters most. Across the corpus, 82 of 112 papers (73%) specify no geographic context. Papers aligned with health or physical/ecological SDGs specify geography 37-40% of the time, while papers aligned with institutional and social-policy SDGs do so only 13%. SDG 16, peace, justice, and strong institutions, is both the most-covered goal in the corpus and the one with the lowest geographic-specification rate. We interpret this as moral abstraction: agentic AI for social good often treats institutional good as universal in ways it does not treat health or ecological good. A second finding compounds this: only 28 of 112 papers (25%) report any real-world deployment or small-scale test. We identify five accountability gaps and propose a minimal reporting standard for more context-specific, participatory, and accountable agentic AI for social good.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.22995
PDF
-
Dream machine -- the next creative economy
Abstract
We examine the structural transformation of creative industries under generative artificial intelligence, drawing on 374 primary sources spanning policy documents, industry data, creator surveys, and platform analytics. Beginning with the December 2024 release of OpenAI's Sora video model as a watershed event, we trace the historical pattern of creative resistance to technological disruption, then develop an analytical framework -- the Human-AI Agency Continuum for mapping the spectrum of human and machine collaboration in creative work. We present evidence for the "slop ceiling," an audience-imposed quality threshold that constrains AI-generated content to approximately 1--3% of platform streams despite comprising 44% of uploads. Analysis of the UK Government's 2025 consultation on AI and copyright (over 11,500 responses, 88% opposing expanded AI training rights) reveals deep structural tensions between technology firms and creative workers. We investigate how major studios, from Disney's $1 billion OpenAI investment to Netflix's AI-native animation unit, are positioning for an AI-augmented production pipeline. The work covers coordination collapse in creative supply chains, the emergence of new professional roles such as prompt engineers and AI orchestrators, and proposes four principles for navigating the transition: transparency, consent, compensation, and human-centred design. Eight appendices provide quantitative analysis, a glossary, topical bibliography, and deep dives into shadow AI adoption, AI stigma, and algorithmic intent.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.26114
PDF
-
Pretraining Data Exposure in Large Language Models: A Survey of Membership Inference, Data Contamination, and Security Implications
2026-05-21 10:32:33Ziyi Tong, Feifei Sun, Le Minh NguyenAbstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have become the predominant paradigm in NLP, advancing both research and industry. As model sizes and pretraining data grow, concerns about Pretraining Data Exposure (PDE) increase due to the scale and opacity of training datasets. PDE refers to determining whether specific data appeared in an LLM's pretraining corpus. It is critical for ensuring evaluation integrity and protecting privacy, intersecting two key areas: data contamination and membership inference. Though conceptually related, these areas have often been studied in isolation. This paper offers the first unified survey of both under the PDE framework. We formalize PDE across exposure levels, review attack and defense methods, synthesize empirical findings, and highlight open challenges and future research directions.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.26133
PDF
-
Mapping Tomato Cropping Systems in California Using AlphaEarth Geospatial Embeddings and Deep Learning Analysis
2026-05-20 23:00:54Mohammadreza Narimani, Alireza Pourreza, Parastoo FarajpoorAbstract
Field-scale crop maps support supply-chain forecasting and policy, yet statewide crop identification still often depends on retrospective surveys or remote-sensing workflows built around hand-engineered spectral features. Those pipelines can be accurate, but they require repeated preprocessing and often lose robustness across years. This study evaluated whether Google DeepMind's AlphaEarth geospatial embeddings can serve as an analysis-ready alternative for mapping processing tomato systems in California. LandIQ 2018 crop polygons were used to assemble a balanced reference dataset of 4,742 tomato and 4,742 non-tomato fields. For each polygon, 64-band AlphaEarth embedding chips were extracted and aligned with binary masks, then divided into spatially independent training (n = 6,638), validation (n = 1,422), and test (n = 1,424) sets. A U-Net segmentation model was trained on AWS SageMaker using a composite masked binary cross-entropy and soft Dice loss. To complement hard predictions, Monte Carlo dropout was retained at inference and repeated 100 times per chip to estimate predictive mean and variance. On the independent test set, the model achieved 99.19% pixel accuracy, 98.69% precision, 99.40% recall, 99.04% F1 score, 98.11% intersection over union, and 99.02% chip accuracy. Uncertainty maps were consistently highest near field edges and low within field interiors. The results show that AlphaEarth embeddings retain crop-relevant spatial and temporal structure and can support accurate, field-scale tomato mapping without manual feature engineering.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.21804
PDF
-
Approximation Theory for Neural Networks: Old and New
2026-05-20 17:42:34Soumendu Sundar Mukherjee, Himasish TalukdarAbstract
Universal approximation theorems provide a mathematical explanation for the expressive power of neural networks. They assert that, under mild conditions on the activation function, feedforward neural networks are dense in broad function classes, such as continuous functions on compact subsets of $\mathbb{R}^d$, $L^p$ spaces, or Sobolev spaces. Over the past four decades, these qualitative universality results have evolved into a rich quantitative theory addressing approximation rates, parameter efficiency, and the role of architectural features such as depth and width. This survey presents several glimpses into this theory. We review classical density results for single-hidden-layer networks, as well as quantitative bounds that relate approximation error to network size and smoothness assumptions on target functions. Particular emphasis is placed on depth--width trade-offs and on results demonstrating that deeper architectures can achieve superior parameter efficiency for structured function classes. In addition to standard feedforward neural networks, we also review recent developments on Kolmogorov--Arnold Networks (KANs), which offer an alternative architectural paradigm and whose approximation-theoretic properties have begun to attract significant theoretical attention.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.21451
PDF
-
AIGaitor: Privacy-preserving and cloud-free motion analysis for everyone, using edge computing
2026-05-20 17:14:57Lauhitya Reddy, Trisha M. Kesar, Hyeokhyen KwonAbstract
Motion capture is the gold standard for measuring human movement, but clinical use remains limited by cost, technical complexity, and privacy concerns. AIGaitor is a privacy-preserving, cloud-free motion analysis system that runs markerless monocular motion-capture pipelines and downstream deep-learning analysis entirely on a consumer smartphone using on-device neural accelerators. To motivate its design, we surveyed 74 rehabilitation clinicians: 92 percent said they would adopt an accurate, cost-effective, easy-to-use AI gait analysis tool, while 79.7 percent cited operating cost, 68.9 percent insufficient training, and 64.9 percent privacy concerns as leading barriers. We then optimized and benchmarked mobile iOS implementations of current monocular pipeline components, including 2D and 3D pose estimation, pose optimization, skeleton-based deep-learning analysis, and a vision-language model. A Time-Priority end-to-end on-device pipeline processes a 10 s 4K 60 fps video clip in 77 s on an iPhone 14, matching or beating the same pipeline on a high-end NVIDIA H200 cloud server when network transfer is included: 94 s at global mobile-average uplink and 66 s at developed-world Wi-Fi. Lightweight models such as ViTPose-s achieve real-time keypoint extraction, and skeleton-based action-recognition models provide sub-millisecond gait classification on the same clip. To our knowledge, AIGaitor is the first monocular system to demonstrate end-to-end on-device motion capture and downstream deep-learning analysis, supporting clinically applicable movement analysis that is low-cost, private, and accessible to smartphone users.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.21421
PDF
-
Perception of Social Robots as Communication Partners in Healthcare for Older Adults
2026-05-20 11:38:45Hana Yamamoto, Carlotta Julia Mayer, Charlotte Raithel, Theresa Buchner, Christian Werner, Yasuhisa Hirata, Monika Eckstein, Katja MombaurAbstract
Addressing the global caregiver shortage through socially assistive robots necessitates a deep understanding of their psychological and physiological impacts on older adults during human-robot interaction (HRI). This study addresses whether social robots can serve as effective interaction partners compared to humans, and if "positive prompts" can similarly enhance these interactions. We conducted a comparative study with 35 participants (aged 70+). Our multi-modal analysis, integrating facial expression data, heart rate variability, and subjective questionnaires, revealed no significant differences in overall stress levels between human and robot interactions. Facial expression analysis confirmed that the robot was accepted as a valid interaction partner, while physiological data showed slightly lower heart rates during robot interactions, suggesting a more relaxed state compared to human-led sessions. These findings indicate that social robots can engage older adults without inducing psychological strain and are capable of alleviating caregiver burden by performing structured tasks, such as health-sensing surveys. Future work should address the identified "appearance-content mismatch" in robot design to facilitate even more natural and effective interactions.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.21053
PDF
-
The Illusion of Intervention: Your LLM-Simulated Experiment is an Observational Study
2026-05-20 06:09:41Victoria Lin, Taedong Yun, Maja Matari\'c, John Canny, Arthur Gretton, Alexander D'AmourAbstract
Large language models (LLMs) show potential as simulators of human behavior, offering a scalable way to study responses to interventions. However, because LLMs are trained largely on observational data, interventions in experiments with LLM-simulated synthetic users can induce unintended shifts in latent user attributes, causing user drift where the implicit simulated population differs across treatment conditions, potentially distorting effect estimates. We formalize the confounding or selection bias that can arise due to user drift and show how intervention-dependent shifts can inflate or attenuate observed differences in user responses under intervention. To diagnose confounding, we propose using negative control outcomes--attributes that should remain invariant under intervention--to identify distribution shifts across intervention conditions, providing evidence of user drift. To mitigate drift, we study adjusting the persona specification by eliciting additional confounders, finding that targeted, setting-relevant confounders can substantially reduce bias across survey-style and multi-turn agent evaluations.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.20767
PDF
-
Open-World Evaluations for Measuring Frontier AI Capabilities
2026-05-19 21:42:32Sayash Kapoor, Peter Kirgis, Andrew Schwartz, Stephan Rabanser, J. J. Allaire, Rishi Bommasani, Harry Coppock, Magda Dubois, Gillian K Hadfield, Andrew B. Hall, Sara Hooker, Seth Lazar, Steve Newman, Dimitris Papailiopoulos, Shoshannah Tekofsky, Helen Toner, Cozmin Ududec, Arvind NarayananAbstract
Benchmark-based evaluation remains important for tracking frontier AI progress. But it can both overstate and understate deployed capability because it privileges tasks that can be precisely specified, automatically graded, easy to optimize for, and run with low budgets and short time horizons. We advocate for a complementary class of evaluations, which we term open-world evaluations: long-horizon, messy, real-world tasks assessed through small-sample qualitative analysis rather than benchmark-scale automation. In this paper we survey recent open-world evaluations, identify their strengths and limitations, and introduce CRUX (Collaborative Research for Updating AI eXpectations), a project for conducting such evaluations regularly. As a first instance, we task an AI agent with developing and publishing a simple iOS application to the Apple App Store. The agent completed the task with only a single avoidable manual intervention, suggesting that open-world evaluations can provide early warning of capabilities that may soon become widespread. We conclude with recommendations for designing and reporting open-world evals.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.20520
PDF
-
Occupational Prompting Reveals Cultural Bias in Large Language Models
2026-05-19 16:58:15Maksim E. Eren, Andrea Brennen, Ryan C. Barron, Eric MichalakAbstract
Social roles shape expectations, priorities, and judgments, yet it remains unclear how large language models (LLMs) associate occupational identities with broader cultural value patterns. Prior work used nationality-based cultural prompting to study how LLM responses to value-survey questions align with human cultural benchmarks. In this paper, we extend that framework by replacing cultural prompting with occupational prompting to examine how professional-role cues influence value-survey responses in open-weight LLMs. Using a survey-grounded evaluation pipeline based on questions from the Integrated Values Surveys, we project model responses into the two-dimensional Inglehart--Welzel cultural space. We prompt open-weight LLMs to answer questions under occupational identities such as accountant, teacher, engineer, and nurse, and then analyze how these occupation-conditioned responses are positioned on the cultural map. Our results show that when open-weight LLMs are prompted with occupations rather than national identities, their responses remain within a broadly Western-leaning region of the cultural map. However, different occupations introduce shifts within this region, producing distinct occupational skews. This indicates that occupational prompts are not treated as neutral role labels, but instead elicit structured value patterns. These findings extend survey-based evaluation of cultural bias beyond nationality-based prompting and provide a framework for studying how occupational personas shape value expression in LLMs.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.12443
PDF
-
Mathematical Reasoning in Large Language Models: Benchmarks, Architectures, Evaluation, and Open Challenges
2026-05-19 11:56:03Husnain Amjad, Raja Khurram Shahzad, Aamir Shahzad, Mehwish FatimaAbstract
Mathematical reasoning is essential for problem-solving in education, science, and industry, serving as a crucial benchmark for evaluating artificial intelligence systems. As Large Language Models (LLMs) improve their reasoning capabilities, understanding how well they perform mathematical reasoning has become increasingly important. This survey synthesizes recent advancements in mathematical reasoning with LLMs through a structured analysis of datasets, architectures, training strategies, and evaluation protocols. Our systematic review encompasses approximately 120 peer-reviewed studies and preprints, examining the evolution of this research area and providing a unified analytical framework to understand current progress and limitations. Our study particularly introduces a unified taxonomy of mathematical datasets, distinguishing between pretraining corpora, supervised fine-tuning resources, and evaluation benchmarks across varying levels of reasoning complexity. A systematic analysis of reasoning architectures and training strategies, including tool integration, verifier-guided reasoning, and parameter-efficient adaptation, is presented to assess their effects on reasoning robustness and generalization. Moreover, a comparative evaluation of existing metrics highlights the gap between final-answer accuracy and process-level reasoning verification. By synthesizing insights across these areas, our analysis identifies recurring failure modes, such as reasoning faithfulness issues, benchmark biases, and generalization limitations, and outlines key research directions toward improving symbolic grounding, evaluation reliability, and the development of more robust and trustworthy LLM-based reasoning systems.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.19723
PDF
-
Efficient Elicitation of Collective Disagreements
2026-05-19 08:23:58Mohamed Ouaguenouni, Felipe Garrido-Lucero, Umberto Grandi, C\'esar Hidalgo, Magdalena TydrichovaAbstract
We analyze the structure of the disagreement among a population of voters over a set of alternatives. Surveys typically ask either for pairwise comparisons, simple and intuitive for participants, or full rankings over alternatives, eliciting the entire voters' preferences. Building on the observation that pairwise comparisons cannot distinguish structural disagreement from noise, we propose a stratified framework to identify the minimal aggregated preference information needed to compute a number of disagreement measures from the literature. Specifically, we introduce the plurality matrix, a generalization of pairwise comparisons that records, for every subset $S$ of alternatives, the probability that each $a \in S$ ranks first in $S$. We define the level of a disagreement measure as the smallest subset size needed to express it, showing that many existing notions, including rank-variance and divisiveness, sit at level $3$, proving that pairwise comparisons are not enough. In addition, we demonstrate the interest of going beyond level $3$ both theoretically and experimentally. To make these results actionable, we design two elicitation protocols to estimate the plurality matrix, exploring the trade-off between the number of required participants and the cognitive load requested to each of them.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.19521
PDF
-
Agentic Trading: When LLM Agents Meet Financial Markets
2026-05-19 04:20:07Yihan Xia, Panpan You, Taotao Wang, Fang Liu, Han Qi, Xiaoxiao Wu, Shengli ZhangAbstract
A growing body of work explores how Large Language Models (LLMs) can be embedded in trading systems as agents that perceive market information, retrieve context, reason about decisions, emit tradable actions, and adapt under market feedback. This paper reframes LLM-based trading agents as expert-system decision pipelines and presents an audit-oriented evidence map of 77 included studies in a protocol-coded snapshot screened through 2026-03-09. A primary empirical subset (n=19) satisfies the minimum boundary of Action Output plus Closed-Loop Evaluation; the remaining 58 included studies are retained as background and design context. The central empirical finding is protocol incomparability: within the primary subset, only 2/19 studies report extractable time-consistent split protocols, 1/19 reports an explicit transaction-cost model, 1/19 documents universe or survivorship handling, 11/19 report execution timing or semantics, 15/19 are coded as R0, and no study reaches R3 reproducibility. We therefore use Architecture-Capability-Adaptation as a working analytical lens rather than a validated taxonomy, and we foreground the evidence ledger, reproducibility audit, and reporting checklist as the main contributions. The resulting survey shows that architectural experimentation is expanding rapidly, while comparable evaluation protocols, execution semantics, and reproducible artifacts remain the field's immediate bottlenecks.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.19337
PDF
-
Can Large Language Models Revolutionize Survey Research? Experiments with Disaster Preparedness Responses
2026-05-19 00:58:36Yan Wang, Ziyi Guo, Christopher McCartyAbstract
Survey research faces mounting structural challenges: declining response rates, sample bias, block-wise missingness among at-risk respondents, and AI-assisted fraudulent completions in online panels. Large language models (LLMs) have been proposed as a remedy, yet rigorous evaluations across the full survey workflow remain scarce, particularly in disaster contexts where data quality matters most. We present and evaluate a five-stage framework for LLM integration covering questionnaire design, sample selection, pilot testing, missing-data imputation, and post-collection analysis, using the 2024 Hurricane Milton preparedness survey of Florida residents (n=946) as a shared empirical testbed. We introduce a Protection Motivation Theory (PMT)-constrained co-occurrence knowledge graph and develop seven LLM configurations spanning zero-shot inference, retrieval-augmented baselines, and novel theory-informed variants. Our proposed Anchored Marginal Theory-Informed LLM (A-TLM) outperforms all three classical imputation baselines (IPW/MI, MICE+PMM, missForest) on RMSE under disaster-relevant block-wise MNAR conditions (S4 RMSE 1.439 vs. 1.496 for the next-best), while achieving near-zero signed bias (-0.121) where the random-forest imputer produces the largest absolute bias (-0.631). Organizing retrieval around PMT causal structure and integrating all evidence in a single model call outperforms unstructured retrieval and staged sequential inference (MAE 0.993 vs. 1.097 for standard RAG). We document that near-zero aggregate bias can mask opposing subgroup errors and propose subgroup-stratified bias auditing as a reporting standard. A retrieval-constrained knowledge-graph chatbot demonstrates that hallucination is architecturally manageable through grounded refusal.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.19229
PDF
