Paper Reading AI Learner

Sensing-based Robustness Challenges in Agricultural Robotic Harvesting

2025-02-18 00:32:32
C. Beldek, J. Cunningham, M. Aydin, E. Sariyildiz, S. L. Phung, G. Alici

Abstract

This paper presents the challenges agricultural robotic harvesters face in detecting and localising fruits under various environmental disturbances. In controlled laboratory settings, both the traditional HSV (Hue Saturation Value) transformation and the YOLOv8 (You Only Look Once) deep learning model were employed. However, only YOLOv8 was utilised in outdoor experiments, as the HSV transformation was not capable of accurately drawing fruit contours. Experiments include ten distinct fruit patterns with six apples and six oranges. A grid structure for homography (perspective) transformation was employed to convert detected midpoints into 3D world coordinates. The experiments evaluated detection and localisation under varying lighting and background disturbances, revealing accurate performance indoors, but significant challenges outdoors. Our results show that indoor experiments using YOLOv8 achieved 100% detection accuracy, while outdoor conditions decreased performance, with an average accuracy of 69.15% for YOLOv8 under direct sunlight. The study demonstrates that real-world applications reveal significant limitations due to changing lighting, background disturbances, and colour and shape variability. These findings underscore the need for further refinement of algorithms and sensors to enhance the robustness of robotic harvesters for agricultural use.

Abstract (translated)

本文介绍了农业机器人收割机在各种环境干扰下检测和定位水果时所面临的挑战。在受控实验室环境中,既使用了传统的HSV(色相饱和度值)转换方法,也采用了YOLOv8(你只需看一次)深度学习模型。然而,在户外实验中仅使用了YOLOv8,因为HSV转换方法无法准确描绘出水果的轮廓。实验包括十种不同的水果图案,其中包含六只苹果和六只橙子。为了将检测到的中心点转化为三维世界坐标,采用了网格结构进行同态(透视)变换。这些实验评估了在不同光照和背景干扰条件下水果的检测与定位情况,结果表明,在室内环境下表现准确,但在户外环境下面临重大挑战。我们的结果显示,在使用YOLOv8的情况下,室内实验实现了100%的检测准确性,而室外条件下的性能有所下降,平均而言,在直接阳光下时YOLOv8的表现为69.15%的精度。这项研究展示了真实世界的应用揭示了由于光照变化、背景干扰和颜色与形状变异所导致的重要限制。这些发现强调了为了增强农业用途中机器人收割机的鲁棒性,进一步完善算法和传感器的需求。

URL

https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.12403

PDF

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2502.12403.pdf


Tags
3D Action Action_Localization Action_Recognition Activity Adversarial Agent Attention Autonomous Bert Boundary_Detection Caption Chat Classification CNN Compressive_Sensing Contour Contrastive_Learning Deep_Learning Denoising Detection Dialog Diffusion Drone Dynamic_Memory_Network Edge_Detection Embedding Embodied Emotion Enhancement Face Face_Detection Face_Recognition Facial_Landmark Few-Shot Gait_Recognition GAN Gaze_Estimation Gesture Gradient_Descent Handwriting Human_Parsing Image_Caption Image_Classification Image_Compression Image_Enhancement Image_Generation Image_Matting Image_Retrieval Inference Inpainting Intelligent_Chip Knowledge Knowledge_Graph Language_Model LLM Matching Medical Memory_Networks Multi_Modal Multi_Task NAS NMT Object_Detection Object_Tracking OCR Ontology Optical_Character Optical_Flow Optimization Person_Re-identification Point_Cloud Portrait_Generation Pose Pose_Estimation Prediction QA Quantitative Quantitative_Finance Quantization Re-identification Recognition Recommendation Reconstruction Regularization Reinforcement_Learning Relation Relation_Extraction Represenation Represenation_Learning Restoration Review RNN Robot Salient Scene_Classification Scene_Generation Scene_Parsing Scene_Text Segmentation Self-Supervised Semantic_Instance_Segmentation Semantic_Segmentation Semi_Global Semi_Supervised Sence_graph Sentiment Sentiment_Classification Sketch SLAM Sparse Speech Speech_Recognition Style_Transfer Summarization Super_Resolution Surveillance Survey Text_Classification Text_Generation Time_Series Tracking Transfer_Learning Transformer Unsupervised Video_Caption Video_Classification Video_Indexing Video_Prediction Video_Retrieval Visual_Relation VQA Weakly_Supervised Zero-Shot