Paper Reading AI Learner

Are We Paying Attention to Her? Investigating Gender Disambiguation and Attention in Machine Translation

2025-05-13 13:17:23
Chiara Manna, Afra Alishahi, Fr\'ed\'eric Blain, Eva Vanmassenhove

Abstract

While gender bias in modern Neural Machine Translation (NMT) systems has received much attention, traditional evaluation metrics do not to fully capture the extent to which these systems integrate contextual gender cues. We propose a novel evaluation metric called Minimal Pair Accuracy (MPA), which measures the reliance of models on gender cues for gender disambiguation. MPA is designed to go beyond surface-level gender accuracy metrics by focusing on whether models adapt to gender cues in minimal pairs -- sentence pairs that differ solely in the gendered pronoun, namely the explicit indicator of the target's entity gender in the source language (EN). We evaluate a number of NMT models on the English-Italian (EN--IT) language pair using this metric, we show that they ignore available gender cues in most cases in favor of (statistical) stereotypical gender interpretation. We further show that in anti-stereotypical cases, these models tend to more consistently take masculine gender cues into account while ignoring the feminine cues. Furthermore, we analyze the attention head weights in the encoder component and show that while all models encode gender information to some extent, masculine cues elicit a more diffused response compared to the more concentrated and specialized responses to feminine gender cues.

Abstract (translated)

尽管现代神经机器翻译(NMT)系统中的性别偏见已受到广泛关注,但传统的评估指标并不能完全捕捉这些系统在整合上下文性别线索方面的程度。为此,我们提出了一种新的评估指标——最小成对准确度(MPA),该指标衡量模型依赖于性别线索进行性别消歧的程度。MPA旨在超越表面的性别准确性指标,通过关注模型如何根据最小对中的性别代词调整其行为来实现这一点——即源语言中目标实体性别的明确指示器。 我们使用这一新指标评估了多种NMT模型在英语-意大利语(EN--IT)语言对上的性能。结果表明,在大多数情况下,这些模型倾向于忽略可用的性别线索而依赖于统计意义上的刻板印象进行性别解读。此外,我们在反向刻板印象的情况下还发现,这些模型更一致地考虑男性性别线索并忽视女性性别线索。 进一步分析编码器组件中的注意力头权重后我们发现,虽然所有模型都在某种程度上编码了性别信息,但男性提示会引发更为分散的响应,而女性性别的提示则引发了更加集中和专业的反应。

URL

https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.08546

PDF

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2505.08546.pdf


Tags
3D Action Action_Localization Action_Recognition Activity Adversarial Agent Attention Autonomous Bert Boundary_Detection Caption Chat Classification CNN Compressive_Sensing Contour Contrastive_Learning Deep_Learning Denoising Detection Dialog Diffusion Drone Dynamic_Memory_Network Edge_Detection Embedding Embodied Emotion Enhancement Face Face_Detection Face_Recognition Facial_Landmark Few-Shot Gait_Recognition GAN Gaze_Estimation Gesture Gradient_Descent Handwriting Human_Parsing Image_Caption Image_Classification Image_Compression Image_Enhancement Image_Generation Image_Matting Image_Retrieval Inference Inpainting Intelligent_Chip Knowledge Knowledge_Graph Language_Model LLM Matching Medical Memory_Networks Multi_Modal Multi_Task NAS NMT Object_Detection Object_Tracking OCR Ontology Optical_Character Optical_Flow Optimization Person_Re-identification Point_Cloud Portrait_Generation Pose Pose_Estimation Prediction QA Quantitative Quantitative_Finance Quantization Re-identification Recognition Recommendation Reconstruction Regularization Reinforcement_Learning Relation Relation_Extraction Represenation Represenation_Learning Restoration Review RNN Robot Salient Scene_Classification Scene_Generation Scene_Parsing Scene_Text Segmentation Self-Supervised Semantic_Instance_Segmentation Semantic_Segmentation Semi_Global Semi_Supervised Sence_graph Sentiment Sentiment_Classification Sketch SLAM Sparse Speech Speech_Recognition Style_Transfer Summarization Super_Resolution Surveillance Survey Text_Classification Text_Generation Time_Series Tracking Transfer_Learning Transformer Unsupervised Video_Caption Video_Classification Video_Indexing Video_Prediction Video_Retrieval Visual_Relation VQA Weakly_Supervised Zero-Shot