Paper Reading AI Learner

Contour Errors: An Ego-Centric Metric for Reliable 3D Multi-Object Tracking

2025-06-04 16:15:04
Sharang Kaul, Mario Berk, Thiemo Gerbich, Abhinav Valada

Abstract

Finding reliable matches is essential in multi-object tracking to ensure the accuracy and reliability of perception systems in safety-critical applications such as autonomous vehicles. Effective matching mitigates perception errors, enhancing object identification and tracking for improved performance and safety. However, traditional metrics such as Intersection over Union (IoU) and Center Point Distances (CPDs), which are effective in 2D image planes, often fail to find critical matches in complex 3D scenes. To address this limitation, we introduce Contour Errors (CEs), an ego or object-centric metric for identifying matches of interest in tracking scenarios from a functional perspective. By comparing bounding boxes in the ego vehicle's frame, contour errors provide a more functionally relevant assessment of object matches. Extensive experiments on the nuScenes dataset demonstrate that contour errors improve the reliability of matches over the state-of-the-art 2D IoU and CPD metrics in tracking-by-detection methods. In 3D car tracking, our results show that Contour Errors reduce functional failures (FPs/FNs) by 80% at close ranges and 60% at far ranges compared to IoU in the evaluation stage.

Abstract (translated)

在多目标跟踪中,找到可靠的匹配是确保感知系统在自动驾驶等安全关键应用中的准确性和可靠性的重要因素。有效的匹配可以减少感知错误,提高物体识别和追踪的性能与安全性。然而,传统的度量标准如交并比(IoU)和中心点距离(CPD),虽然在二维图像平面上效果显著,但在复杂的三维场景中往往难以找到关键匹配。为了解决这一局限性,我们引入了轮廓误差(CEs),这是一种从功能角度出发、以自身车辆或目标为中心的度量标准,用于识别跟踪场景中的感兴趣匹配。通过比较自身车辆坐标系中的边界框,轮廓误差提供了更为功能相关的物体匹配评估。在nuScenes数据集上的广泛实验表明,与当前最优的2D IoU和CPD指标相比,轮廓误差提高了检测到追踪方法中匹配的可靠性。 特别是在三维汽车跟踪方面,我们的结果显示,在评估阶段,与IoU相比,轮廓误差可以将近距离的功能失败(FPs/FNs)减少80%,远距离的则减少60%。

URL

https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.04122

PDF

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2506.04122.pdf


Tags
3D Action Action_Localization Action_Recognition Activity Adversarial Agent Attention Autonomous Bert Boundary_Detection Caption Chat Classification CNN Compressive_Sensing Contour Contrastive_Learning Deep_Learning Denoising Detection Dialog Diffusion Drone Dynamic_Memory_Network Edge_Detection Embedding Embodied Emotion Enhancement Face Face_Detection Face_Recognition Facial_Landmark Few-Shot Gait_Recognition GAN Gaze_Estimation Gesture Gradient_Descent Handwriting Human_Parsing Image_Caption Image_Classification Image_Compression Image_Enhancement Image_Generation Image_Matting Image_Retrieval Inference Inpainting Intelligent_Chip Knowledge Knowledge_Graph Language_Model LLM Matching Medical Memory_Networks Multi_Modal Multi_Task NAS NMT Object_Detection Object_Tracking OCR Ontology Optical_Character Optical_Flow Optimization Person_Re-identification Point_Cloud Portrait_Generation Pose Pose_Estimation Prediction QA Quantitative Quantitative_Finance Quantization Re-identification Recognition Recommendation Reconstruction Regularization Reinforcement_Learning Relation Relation_Extraction Represenation Represenation_Learning Restoration Review RNN Robot Salient Scene_Classification Scene_Generation Scene_Parsing Scene_Text Segmentation Self-Supervised Semantic_Instance_Segmentation Semantic_Segmentation Semi_Global Semi_Supervised Sence_graph Sentiment Sentiment_Classification Sketch SLAM Sparse Speech Speech_Recognition Style_Transfer Summarization Super_Resolution Surveillance Survey Text_Classification Text_Generation Time_Series Tracking Transfer_Learning Transformer Unsupervised Video_Caption Video_Classification Video_Indexing Video_Prediction Video_Retrieval Visual_Relation VQA Weakly_Supervised Zero-Shot