Paper Reading AI Learner

Complexity Bounds for Smooth Convex Multiobjective Optimization

2025-09-16 21:33:11
Phillipe R. Sampaio

Abstract

We study the oracle complexity of finding $\varepsilon$-Pareto stationary points in smooth multiobjective optimization with $m$ objectives. The progress metric is the Pareto stationarity gap $\mathcal{G}(x)$ (the norm of an optimal convex combination of gradients). Our contributions are fourfold. (i) For strongly convex objectives, any span first-order method (iterates lie in the span of past gradients) exhibits linear convergence no faster than $\exp(-\Theta(T/\sqrt{\kappa}))$ after $T$ oracle calls, where $\kappa$ is the condition number, implying $\Theta(\sqrt{\kappa}\log(1/\varepsilon))$ iterations; this matches classical accelerated upper bounds. (ii) For convex problems and oblivious one-step methods (a fixed scalarization with pre-scheduled step sizes), we prove a lower bound of order $1/T$ on the best gradient norm among the first $T$ iterates. (iii) Although accelerated gradient descent is outside this restricted class, it is an oblivious span method and attains the same $1/T$ upper rate on a fixed scalarization. (iv) For convex problems and general span methods with adaptive scalarizations, we establish a universal lower bound of order $1/T^{2}$ on the gradient norm of the final iterate after $T$ steps, highlighting a gap between known upper bounds and worst-case guarantees. All bounds hold on non-degenerate instances with distinct objectives and non-singleton Pareto fronts; rates are stated up to universal constants and natural problem scaling.

Abstract (translated)

我们研究了在具有$m$个目标的光滑多目标优化中寻找$\varepsilon$-Pareto平稳点的oracle复杂度。衡量指标是Pareto平稳间隙$\mathcal{G}(x)$(即梯度最优凸组合的范数)。我们的贡献有四个方面: (i) 对于强凸的目标函数,任何span一阶方法(迭代值位于过去梯度张成的空间内)在进行了$T$次oracle调用后最多显示线性收敛速度$\exp(-\Theta(T/\sqrt{\kappa}))$,其中$\kappa$是条件数。这需要$\Theta(\sqrt{\kappa}\log(1/\varepsilon))$轮迭代,与经典的加速上限相匹配。 (ii) 对于凸问题和无记忆单步方法(固定标量化且预设步长),我们证明了在前$T$次迭代中最佳梯度范数的下界为$\Theta(1/T)$。 (iii) 虽然加速梯度下降超出了这个受限类别,但它是无记忆span方法,在固定的标量化上达到了同样的$\Theta(1/T)$上限。 (iv) 对于凸问题和一般span方法,如果采用自适应标量化,则在进行了$T$步之后,最终迭代的梯度范数具有下界$\Theta(1/T^2)$。这揭示了已知的上界与最坏情况保证之间的差距。 所有这些界限适用于目标不相同且非单点Pareto前沿的情况;速率表达到了通用常量和自然问题标度为止。

URL

https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.13550

PDF

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2509.13550.pdf


Tags
3D Action Action_Localization Action_Recognition Activity Adversarial Agent Attention Autonomous Bert Boundary_Detection Caption Chat Classification CNN Compressive_Sensing Contour Contrastive_Learning Deep_Learning Denoising Detection Dialog Diffusion Drone Dynamic_Memory_Network Edge_Detection Embedding Embodied Emotion Enhancement Face Face_Detection Face_Recognition Facial_Landmark Few-Shot Gait_Recognition GAN Gaze_Estimation Gesture Gradient_Descent Handwriting Human_Parsing Image_Caption Image_Classification Image_Compression Image_Enhancement Image_Generation Image_Matting Image_Retrieval Inference Inpainting Intelligent_Chip Knowledge Knowledge_Graph Language_Model LLM Matching Medical Memory_Networks Multi_Modal Multi_Task NAS NMT Object_Detection Object_Tracking OCR Ontology Optical_Character Optical_Flow Optimization Person_Re-identification Point_Cloud Portrait_Generation Pose Pose_Estimation Prediction QA Quantitative Quantitative_Finance Quantization Re-identification Recognition Recommendation Reconstruction Regularization Reinforcement_Learning Relation Relation_Extraction Represenation Represenation_Learning Restoration Review RNN Robot Salient Scene_Classification Scene_Generation Scene_Parsing Scene_Text Segmentation Self-Supervised Semantic_Instance_Segmentation Semantic_Segmentation Semi_Global Semi_Supervised Sence_graph Sentiment Sentiment_Classification Sketch SLAM Sparse Speech Speech_Recognition Style_Transfer Summarization Super_Resolution Surveillance Survey Text_Classification Text_Generation Time_Series Tracking Transfer_Learning Transformer Unsupervised Video_Caption Video_Classification Video_Indexing Video_Prediction Video_Retrieval Visual_Relation VQA Weakly_Supervised Zero-Shot