Paper Reading AI Learner

Super-resolution of airborne laser scanning point clouds for forest inventory

2026-05-04 03:59:04
Jinyuan Shao, Sangyoong Park, Chunxi Zhao, Ayman Habib, Songlin Fei

Abstract

Airborne Laser Scanning (ALS) can collect point clouds across large areas, enabling large-scale forest inventory. However, ALS point clouds are sparse and noisy, resulting in inaccurate individual-tree-level forest inventory, such as stem localization and tree size estimation. To overcome this problem, we propose a deep learning model, 3D Forest Super Resolution (3DFSR), to simultaneously improve point density and reduce noise for ALS forest point cloud. 3DFSR is a voxel-based CNN with a U-Net architecture. The proposed 3DFSR is evaluated on ALS point clouds collected in both temperate forests in the U.S. and boreal forests in Germany. Experimental results demonstrate that 3DFSR can generate finer point clouds of tree structure than other state-of-the-art point cloud super-resolution algorithms, achieving 0.249 m Chamfer Distance and 2.711 m Hausdorff Distance. Furthermore, to verify the effectiveness of 3DFSR point clouds in forest inventory, we conduct stem detection, DBH measurements, and stem reconstruction on both original ALS point clouds and 3DFSR enhanced point clouds. We find that stem detection and reconstruction algorithms developed for TLS/MLS point clouds can directly work on our 3DFSR point clouds, and DBH can be derived with circle-fitting method. F1 score of stem detection is improved from 0.71 on original ALS point clouds to 0.97 on 3DFSR point clouds; DBH estimation improves from 13.45 cm RMSE using allometric equations to 6.43 cm using circle fitting; comparing to stems reconstruction from MLS point clouds, stem reconstructed from 3DFSR point clouds has 0.170 m of Chamfer Distance and 0.377 m of Hausdorff Distance, and 0.95 R2 volume estimation. Finally, we find that the proposed 3DFSR is applicable to process point densities from 10 to 1700 points/m2; it also can be generalized across data collected from different LiDAR platforms without transfer learning.

Abstract (translated)

URL

https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.02201

PDF

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2605.02201.pdf


Tags
3D Action Action_Localization Action_Recognition Activity Adversarial Agent Attention Autonomous Bert Boundary_Detection Caption Chat Classification CNN Compressive_Sensing Contour Contrastive_Learning Deep_Learning Denoising Detection Dialog Diffusion Drone Dynamic_Memory_Network Edge_Detection Embedding Embodied Emotion Enhancement Face Face_Detection Face_Recognition Facial_Landmark Few-Shot Gait_Recognition GAN Gaze_Estimation Gesture Gradient_Descent Handwriting Human_Parsing Image_Caption Image_Classification Image_Compression Image_Enhancement Image_Generation Image_Matting Image_Retrieval Inference Inpainting Intelligent_Chip Knowledge Knowledge_Graph Language_Model LLM Matching Medical Memory_Networks Multi_Modal Multi_Task NAS NMT Object_Detection Object_Tracking OCR Ontology Optical_Character Optical_Flow Optimization Person_Re-identification Point_Cloud Portrait_Generation Pose Pose_Estimation Prediction QA Quantitative Quantitative_Finance Quantization Re-identification Recognition Recommendation Reconstruction Regularization Reinforcement_Learning Relation Relation_Extraction Represenation Represenation_Learning Restoration Review RNN Robot Salient Scene_Classification Scene_Generation Scene_Parsing Scene_Text Segmentation Self-Supervised Semantic_Instance_Segmentation Semantic_Segmentation Semi_Global Semi_Supervised Sence_graph Sentiment Sentiment_Classification Sketch SLAM Sparse Speech Speech_Recognition Style_Transfer Summarization Super_Resolution Surveillance Survey Text_Classification Text_Generation Time_Series Tracking Transfer_Learning Transformer Unsupervised Video_Caption Video_Classification Video_Indexing Video_Prediction Video_Retrieval Visual_Relation VQA Weakly_Supervised Zero-Shot