Abstract
Assessing the quality of single image super-resolution (SISR) results remains an open methodological problem. Common full-reference metrics (PSNR, SSIM, LPIPS) do not explicitly evaluate the preservation of the geometric structure of images, which is critical for the correctness of scale-based reconstruction. In addition, they require the forced alignment of images to the same size (\textit{forced resizing}), which introduces an external interpolation error into the evaluation process. This paper proposes a diagnostic scale-invariant quality measure, MSIQ (\textit{Moment-based Scale-Invariant Quality}), based on the comparison of normalized central geometric moments of two images. MSIQ enables direct comparison of images with different spatial resolutions without resizing, is mathematically deterministic (\textit{model-free}), and has an analytical form. To provide a theoretical basis for the approach, we introduce a conceptual distinction between the ability of metrics to monotonically track degradation (\textit{tracking ability}) and their geometric selectivity (\textit{geometric specificity}). The experimental validation confirmed the stability of MSIQ under uniform scaling and, at the same time, revealed the high sensitivity of traditional metrics to the choice of interpolation method. The results show that MSIQ has pronounced geometric selectivity: the proposed measure effectively separates geometric deformations from non-geometric artifacts, in particular JPEG compression, unlike pixel-based and perceptual metrics. It is also shown that the response of MSIQ to structural perturbations remains stable across different classes of SR algorithms, including DNN models with different architectures. The proposed measure is a complementary diagnostic tool for domains where geometric fidelity has priority, in particular medical imaging and remote sensing.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.17588
