Paper Reading AI Learner

Reasoning4Sciences: Bridging Reasoning Language Models to All Scientific Branches

2026-05-31 10:27:18
Teddy Ferdinan, Bart{\l}omiej Koptyra, Miko{\l}aj Langner, Tomasz Adamczyk, {\L}ukasz Radli\'nski, Maciej Markiewicz, Aleksander Szcz\k{e}sny, Stanis{\l}aw Wo\'zniak, Tymoteusz Romanowicz, Dzmitry Pihulski, Mateusz Zbrocki, Mateusz \'Smigielski, Micha{\l} Rajkowski, Mateusz Biedka, Konrad Kie{\l}czy\'nski, Konrad Wojtasik, Jacek Duszenko, Jan Eliasz, Piotr Matys, Micha{\l} Bernacki-Janson, Maria Bellaniar Ismiati, Latius Hermawan, Wiktoria Mieleszczenko-Kowszewicz, Anna Kubicka-Sowinska, Grzegorz Chodak, Karol Postawa, Pawe{\l} Zyblewski, Tomasz Szanda{\l}a, {\L}ukasz Sterczewski, Adrian Chajec, Pawel Niewiadomski, Piotr Gruber, Marcin Wdowikowski, S{\l}awomir Czarnecki, Bart{\l}omiej Kryszak, Dominik Drabik, Tomasz Kajdanowicz, Kamil Mamak, Pawe{\l} Pre\'s, Katarzyna Paczkowska, Joachim Sobczuk, Tomasz Zi\k{e}ba, Jan Koco\'n, Maciej Piasecki, Przemys{\l}aw Kazienko
arXiv_AI
       
Abstract

While Reasoning Language Models (RLMs) are rapidly emerging as powerful tools for scientific research, their impact is primarily concentrated in "hard science" fields. The slow -- or lack of -- adoption of RLMs in other branches of science is causing a widening gap in research productivity. In this survey, we provide the first comprehensive analysis of RLM adoption across 28 scientific disciplines following the classification used by the European Research Council (ERC), spanning the Social Sciences and Humanities, Physical Sciences and Engineering, and Life Sciences. We examine how RLMs are developed, evaluated, and applied across disciplines. Furthermore, we introduce a maturity-oriented assessment framework based on available domain-specific development and evaluation resources, revealing substantial disparities in RLM maturity that become even more pronounced when only publicly available resources are considered. Finally, we highlight current implementation paradigms that are gaining popularity across disciplines, current challenges, and future directions in enabling RLM adoption across science.

Abstract (translated)

URL

https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.01145

PDF

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2606.01145.pdf

Tags
3D Action Action_Localization Action_Recognition Activity Adversarial Agent Attention Autonomous Bert Boundary_Detection Caption Chat Classification CNN Compressive_Sensing Contour Contrastive_Learning Deep_Learning Denoising Detection Dialog Diffusion Drone Dynamic_Memory_Network Edge_Detection Embedding Embodied Emotion Enhancement Face Face_Detection Face_Recognition Facial_Landmark Few-Shot Gait_Recognition GAN Gaze_Estimation Gesture Gradient_Descent Handwriting Human_Parsing Image_Caption Image_Classification Image_Compression Image_Enhancement Image_Generation Image_Matting Image_Retrieval Inference Inpainting Intelligent_Chip Knowledge Knowledge_Graph Language_Model LLM Matching Medical Memory_Networks Multi_Modal Multi_Task NAS NMT Object_Detection Object_Tracking OCR Ontology Optical_Character Optical_Flow Optimization Person_Re-identification Point_Cloud Portrait_Generation Pose Pose_Estimation Prediction QA Quantitative Quantitative_Finance Quantization Re-identification Recognition Recommendation Reconstruction Regularization Reinforcement_Learning Relation Relation_Extraction Represenation Represenation_Learning Restoration Review RNN Robot Salient Scene_Classification Scene_Generation Scene_Parsing Scene_Text Segmentation Self-Supervised Semantic_Instance_Segmentation Semantic_Segmentation Semi_Global Semi_Supervised Sence_graph Sentiment Sentiment_Classification Sketch SLAM Sparse Speech Speech_Recognition Style_Transfer Summarization Super_Resolution Surveillance Survey Text_Classification Text_Generation Time_Series Tracking Transfer_Learning Transformer Unsupervised Video_Caption Video_Classification Video_Indexing Video_Prediction Video_Retrieval Visual_Relation VQA Weakly_Supervised Zero-Shot