Paper Reading AI Learner

A Parameter-Free Few-Shot Evaluation for Elephant Vocalisation Classification

2026-08-14 18:54:24
Christiaan M. Geldenhuys, Thomas R. Niesler

Abstract

We present a parameter-free episodic evaluation of nearest-centroid classification for elephant vocalisations on fixed pretrained acoustic embeddings, across the Elephant Voices (EV) and Linguistic Data Consortium (LDC) datasets. Rather than asking which embedding yields the best classifier when trained on all available labelled data, we ask how the simplest classifier performs as labelled exemplars per class are varied. Each class is represented by the mean of its support-set embeddings, and each query is assigned to the nearest centroid under squared Euclidean distance. We evaluate this centroid classifier on the Perch (ver. 1), Perch (ver. 2), and HuBERT (base, layer 2) embeddings, together with mel frequency cepstral coefficient (MFCC) features, in an N-way k-shot manner under the same cross-validation protocol as the trained baselines. A bootstrap over 100 resampled support sets quantifies the sampling noise. On the smaller, low-resource EV dataset, the centroid classifier using the stronger Perch (ver. 1) and Perch (ver. 2) embeddings overtakes the fully-trained logistic regression classifier from a single exemplar per class and the stronger recurrent classifier from two. Over the reduced set of call types on which the strongly-supervised end-to-end baseline was trained, the centroid classifier matches and then surpasses that baseline in mean average precision (mAP), from a few exemplars per class. On the larger LDC dataset, where labelled exemplars are abundant, the trained baselines retain their advantage at every k considered. At five exemplars per class, the centroid classifier using the strongest embedding, Perch (ver. 2), attains a mAP of 0.542 on the EV dataset and 0.368 on the LDC dataset. Parameter-free nearest-centroid classification is the stronger choice when labelled exemplars are few and the fixed embedding already encodes the features that separate the call types.

Abstract (translated)

URL

https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.14824

PDF

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2608.14824.pdf


Tags
3D Action Action_Localization Action_Recognition Activity Adversarial Agent Attention Autonomous Bert Boundary_Detection Caption Chat Classification CNN Compressive_Sensing Contour Contrastive_Learning Deep_Learning Denoising Detection Dialog Diffusion Drone Dynamic_Memory_Network Edge_Detection Embedding Embodied Emotion Enhancement Face Face_Detection Face_Recognition Facial_Landmark Few-Shot Gait_Recognition GAN Gaze_Estimation Gesture Gradient_Descent Handwriting Human_Parsing Image_Caption Image_Classification Image_Compression Image_Enhancement Image_Generation Image_Matting Image_Retrieval Inference Inpainting Intelligent_Chip Knowledge Knowledge_Graph Language_Model LLM Matching Medical Memory_Networks Multi_Modal Multi_Task NAS NMT Object_Detection Object_Tracking OCR Ontology Optical_Character Optical_Flow Optimization Person_Re-identification Point_Cloud Portrait_Generation Pose Pose_Estimation Prediction QA Quantitative Quantitative_Finance Quantization Re-identification Recognition Recommendation Reconstruction Regularization Reinforcement_Learning Relation Relation_Extraction Represenation Represenation_Learning Restoration Review RNN Robot Salient Scene_Classification Scene_Generation Scene_Parsing Scene_Text Segmentation Self-Supervised Semantic_Instance_Segmentation Semantic_Segmentation Semi_Global Semi_Supervised Sence_graph Sentiment Sentiment_Classification Sketch SLAM Sparse Speech Speech_Recognition Style_Transfer Summarization Super_Resolution Surveillance Survey Text_Classification Text_Generation Time_Series Tracking Transfer_Learning Transformer Unsupervised Video_Caption Video_Classification Video_Indexing Video_Prediction Video_Retrieval Visual_Relation VQA Weakly_Supervised Zero-Shot