Paper Reading AI Learner

Spiking Neural Networks for Energy-Efficient Object Detection in Forward-Looking Sonar Imagery

2026-08-22 18:31:15
Gwenevere Frank, Gert Cauwenberghs

Abstract

Autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs) are increasingly important tools in industries ranging from research, to energy, to defense. AUVs are power-constrained platforms operating in remote environments with fixed battery capacities, where propulsion competes with compute and sensors for power over lengthy mission durations. AUVs frequently operate in dark or turbid waters where optical sensing is of limited value, and rely on sonar as their primary sensing modality. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are the state-of-the-art solution for object detection in forward-looking sonar imagery, but are energy expensive (e.g. YOLOv8m: 322 mJ/inference). Spiking neural networks (SNNs) rely on binary spike activations and thus sparse accumulate-only operations, allowing them to be remarkably energy efficient, particularly when paired with dedicated neuromorphic hardware. The sparse, high-contrast structure of forward-looking sonar (FLS) returns is structurally matched to spike coding in a way that optical imagery is not. No prior work has assessed the suitability of SNNs for object detection in FLS imagery. SpikeYOLO, a fully spiking network trained with surrogate gradients, was benchmarked against state-of-the-art CNN baselines on three FLS object detection datasets. Key results: SpikeYOLO T=2 achieves 3.3$\times$ lower theoretical compute energy on UATD (97 vs 322 mJ) at competitive accuracy (0.529 mAP@0.5:0.95 vs. YOLOv8m's 0.575); SpikeYOLO matches YOLOv8m on mAP@0.5 and outperforms YOLO-SONAR and Fast R-CNN baselines on the sparse Marine-Debris-FLS dataset at 4.4$\times$ lower energy; SpikeYOLO demonstrates superior robustness to multiplicative speckle noise (3.0% degradation at $\sigma{=}0.4$ vs. 8.9% for YOLOv8m), outperforming YOLOv8m outright at $\sigma{=}0.6$, directly relevant to real-world FLS deployment.

Abstract (translated)

URL

https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.22072

PDF

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2608.22072.pdf


Tags
3D Action Action_Localization Action_Recognition Activity Adversarial Agent Attention Autonomous Bert Boundary_Detection Caption Chat Classification CNN Compressive_Sensing Contour Contrastive_Learning Deep_Learning Denoising Detection Dialog Diffusion Drone Dynamic_Memory_Network Edge_Detection Embedding Embodied Emotion Enhancement Face Face_Detection Face_Recognition Facial_Landmark Few-Shot Gait_Recognition GAN Gaze_Estimation Gesture Gradient_Descent Handwriting Human_Parsing Image_Caption Image_Classification Image_Compression Image_Enhancement Image_Generation Image_Matting Image_Retrieval Inference Inpainting Intelligent_Chip Knowledge Knowledge_Graph Language_Model LLM Matching Medical Memory_Networks Multi_Modal Multi_Task NAS NMT Object_Detection Object_Tracking OCR Ontology Optical_Character Optical_Flow Optimization Person_Re-identification Point_Cloud Portrait_Generation Pose Pose_Estimation Prediction QA Quantitative Quantitative_Finance Quantization Re-identification Recognition Recommendation Reconstruction Regularization Reinforcement_Learning Relation Relation_Extraction Represenation Represenation_Learning Restoration Review RNN Robot Salient Scene_Classification Scene_Generation Scene_Parsing Scene_Text Segmentation Self-Supervised Semantic_Instance_Segmentation Semantic_Segmentation Semi_Global Semi_Supervised Sence_graph Sentiment Sentiment_Classification Sketch SLAM Sparse Speech Speech_Recognition Style_Transfer Summarization Super_Resolution Surveillance Survey Text_Classification Text_Generation Time_Series Tracking Transfer_Learning Transformer Unsupervised Video_Caption Video_Classification Video_Indexing Video_Prediction Video_Retrieval Visual_Relation VQA Weakly_Supervised Zero-Shot