Abstract
Music source separation (MSS) is increasingly used not to remix music but to measure it: separated drum stems feed studies of microtiming, dynamics, and groove. The field evaluates separators almost exclusively by signal-to-distortion ratio (SDR), yet microrhythm research shows that a sound's perceived temporal location (its p-centre) is co-determined by its attack and envelope, precisely the properties SDR was not designed to protect. We quantify what four open separators spanning four architecture generations (Spleeter, HT-Demucs, BS-Roformer, SCNetXL) do to rhythm-critical signal properties, using the 50-track MUSDB18-HQ test set, where true stems make every claim falsifiable. Three findings emerge. (1) Onset timing is safe: onset F-measure tracks SI-SDR (Spearman rho = 0.62) and is invariant to input length. (2) Transient and dynamic shape are not: their distortion correlates only weakly with SI-SDR (|rho| <= 0.29), and the model ranking inverts - the SDR leader distorts drum attacks twice as much as its capability-matched CNN counterpart, while the SDR-worst model preserves dynamics better than a mid-pack one. Each model imposes a systematic, model-specific bias on the dynamic profile. (3) Input length reshapes the rendered attack of a fixed passage (marginally more for the transformer; paired p = 0.044) while leaving onset locations untouched. For rhythmic studies, separator choice and input conditions are methodological variables to be reported, and SDR alone cannot stand in for them.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.04224
