Paper Reading AI Learner

Discriminative Flow Matching: Beyond Time-Conditioning in Generative Restoration via Flow-State Representations

2026-09-03 22:28:55
Shrishti Saha Shetu, Emanu\"el A. P. Habets, Andreas Brendel

Abstract

Existing Conditional Flow Matching (CFM) formulations describe transport progress using an explicit interpolation coordinate, commonly interpreted as time, assuming that a single global variable adequately represents a sample's position along the generative trajectory. In restoration tasks, however, transport progress is sample-dependent because the initial distribution may exhibit varying statistical dependencies with the target distribution. Thus, samples at the same interpolation coordinate can differ substantially in degradation level, distance to the target distribution, and restoration difficulty. We investigate whether signal representations learned by discriminatively trained models provide a meaningful description of generative transport state in CFM-based restoration. Through systematic latent-space analysis, we show that discriminative representations organize according to degradation severity and follow a consistent trajectory toward the clean-data manifold during generation. Motivated by these observations, we introduce the Discriminative Flow-State Hypothesis, which posits that discriminative representations encode a transport state governing generative restoration. Based on this hypothesis, we propose Discriminative Flow Matching, which conditions the Flow-Matching velocity field on Discriminative Flow-State Representations rather than explicit time coordinates. Experiments on speech enhancement and image denoising show that these representations characterize restoration progress, enable adaptive inference, and consistently outperform CFM and diffusion-related baselines. Our findings suggest that discriminative representations provide an effective state-aware alternative to explicit time conditioning and offer a novel perspective on the relationship between discriminative and CFM-based generative modeling.

Abstract (translated)

URL

https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.04525

PDF

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2609.04525.pdf


Tags
3D Action Action_Localization Action_Recognition Activity Adversarial Agent Attention Autonomous Bert Boundary_Detection Caption Chat Classification CNN Compressive_Sensing Contour Contrastive_Learning Deep_Learning Denoising Detection Dialog Diffusion Drone Dynamic_Memory_Network Edge_Detection Embedding Embodied Emotion Enhancement Face Face_Detection Face_Recognition Facial_Landmark Few-Shot Gait_Recognition GAN Gaze_Estimation Gesture Gradient_Descent Handwriting Human_Parsing Image_Caption Image_Classification Image_Compression Image_Enhancement Image_Generation Image_Matting Image_Retrieval Inference Inpainting Intelligent_Chip Knowledge Knowledge_Graph Language_Model LLM Matching Medical Memory_Networks Multi_Modal Multi_Task NAS NMT Object_Detection Object_Tracking OCR Ontology Optical_Character Optical_Flow Optimization Person_Re-identification Point_Cloud Portrait_Generation Pose Pose_Estimation Prediction QA Quantitative Quantitative_Finance Quantization Re-identification Recognition Recommendation Reconstruction Regularization Reinforcement_Learning Relation Relation_Extraction Represenation Represenation_Learning Restoration Review RNN Robot Salient Scene_Classification Scene_Generation Scene_Parsing Scene_Text Segmentation Self-Supervised Semantic_Instance_Segmentation Semantic_Segmentation Semi_Global Semi_Supervised Sence_graph Sentiment Sentiment_Classification Sketch SLAM Sparse Speech Speech_Recognition Style_Transfer Summarization Super_Resolution Surveillance Survey Text_Classification Text_Generation Time_Series Tracking Transfer_Learning Transformer Unsupervised Video_Caption Video_Classification Video_Indexing Video_Prediction Video_Retrieval Visual_Relation VQA Weakly_Supervised Zero-Shot