Abstract
Sports highlight detection aims to identify the most exciting and meaningful moments from long sports videos. While existing methods often emphasize visual or visual-language representations, sports videos contain rich audio cues, including commentator speech, crowd reactions, whistles, ball impacts, and referee calls. In this work, we revisit the role of audio in sports highlight detection and ask a simple question: how far can audio alone go? We construct lightweight audio-only baselines using pretrained audio representations and compare them with visual-only and audio-visual methods on the SV-Highlights benchmark. Surprisingly, our audio-only GRU baseline achieves strong performance and outperforms several existing audio-visual methods under our supervised evaluation setting. Furthermore, a simple audio-visual fusion baseline achieves the best performance across all metrics, indicating that audio and visual cues provide complementary information. To better understand the contribution of audio, we conduct source-separated analysis and show that vocal/commentary audio is more informative than background-only audio, while their combination performs best. We also analyze interpretable audio cues and find that highlight clips exhibit higher RMS loudness, peak loudness, and mid-frequency energy than non-highlight clips, although substantial distribution overlap indicates that loudness alone is insufficient. Our findings suggest that audio is an underexplored but highly informative modality for sports highlight detection and should be treated as a primary signal rather than merely an auxiliary cue.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.17923
