Paper Reading AI Learner

Labeled Incidence Structures for Native Transformer Modeling of Text, Knowledge Graphs, and Hypergraphs

2026-07-29 11:30:33
Mahesh Godavarti

Abstract

Text, knowledge graphs, and hypergraphs all have elements that play distinct roles within relation instances, structure that is lost when data is flattened into token sequences. We introduce labeled incidence structures (LIS), a uniform representation that encodes each endpoint as $(x_d, s, e)$: content $x_d$, a role or slot $s$, and the relation instance $e$ in which that role appears. Because every data type maps to the same $(x_d, s, e)$ representation without flattening, a single standard transformer can process them all natively, structural differences are carried entirely by the operators, not the architecture. LIS assigns a structural address to each endpoint by composing a slot operator and an instance operator, $A(s,e) = R_s R_e$. We characterize when this factorization gives every token a unique, path-independent address. When it does, the natural operator comparing endpoint $j$ to endpoint $i$ is the relative transport $P_{j\to i} = A_i^{-1} A_j$, which gives attention a role- and relation-aware inductive bias without imposing an arbitrary sequence order. Additive encodings of the form "position term plus relation term" can miss information that depends jointly on $s$ and $e$. We prove this in a controlled example family: when the journey operator is approximated by the sum of a position-only term and a relation-only term, the approximation cannot capture how position and relation combine, only their separate effects. We also analyze persistent knowledge repositories. Identifiers tied to storage locations make models sensitive to storage order, while freely learned identifiers can become harder to control as the repository size $M$ grows relative to the sample size $n$. Computing relation-instance operators from content avoids this storage-order issue and yields a capacity bound independent of $M$, under fixed architectural and Lipschitz assumptions.

Abstract (translated)

URL

https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.20278

PDF

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2609.20278.pdf


Tags
3D Action Action_Localization Action_Recognition Activity Adversarial Agent Attention Autonomous Bert Boundary_Detection Caption Chat Classification CNN Compressive_Sensing Contour Contrastive_Learning Deep_Learning Denoising Detection Dialog Diffusion Drone Dynamic_Memory_Network Edge_Detection Embedding Embodied Emotion Enhancement Face Face_Detection Face_Recognition Facial_Landmark Few-Shot Gait_Recognition GAN Gaze_Estimation Gesture Gradient_Descent Handwriting Human_Parsing Image_Caption Image_Classification Image_Compression Image_Enhancement Image_Generation Image_Matting Image_Retrieval Inference Inpainting Intelligent_Chip Knowledge Knowledge_Graph Language_Model LLM Matching Medical Memory_Networks Multi_Modal Multi_Task NAS NMT Object_Detection Object_Tracking OCR Ontology Optical_Character Optical_Flow Optimization Person_Re-identification Point_Cloud Portrait_Generation Pose Pose_Estimation Prediction QA Quantitative Quantitative_Finance Quantization Re-identification Recognition Recommendation Reconstruction Regularization Reinforcement_Learning Relation Relation_Extraction Represenation Represenation_Learning Restoration Review RNN Robot Salient Scene_Classification Scene_Generation Scene_Parsing Scene_Text Segmentation Self-Supervised Semantic_Instance_Segmentation Semantic_Segmentation Semi_Global Semi_Supervised Sence_graph Sentiment Sentiment_Classification Sketch SLAM Sparse Speech Speech_Recognition Style_Transfer Summarization Super_Resolution Surveillance Survey Text_Classification Text_Generation Time_Series Tracking Transfer_Learning Transformer Unsupervised Video_Caption Video_Classification Video_Indexing Video_Prediction Video_Retrieval Visual_Relation VQA Weakly_Supervised Zero-Shot