Abstract
Deploying a deep object detector in a new setting is limited less by architecture than by the cost of annotating data from that setting. Active learning lowers the cost by choosing which images to label, and the choice is only as good as the signal used to score an unlabeled image. That signal is usually the class posterior, which is cheap but poorly calibrated, or the disagreement across several models or several stochastic passes, which is better but multiplies inference over a pool far larger than the labeled set. We propose a signal richer than the posterior yet still read from one forward pass of one network. A supervised contrastive term added to the training objective shapes a per-object embedding space in which distance encodes class membership, and an unlabeled detection is scored by how far it lies from the region occupied by its predicted category, weighted by its confidence. The criterion needs no ensemble, no auxiliary predictor and no repeated inference, and its entire cost is 2.89M parameters, an increase of 8.3% over a bare detector. On PASCAL VOC and MS-COCO it beats the posterior of the same detector in every round in which a selection is made, by up to 1.08% mAP50 against run to run deviations of 0.02% to 0.18%, and it stays competitive with ensemble and Monte Carlo dropout criteria costing three to fifty forward passes per unlabeled image. Experiments use the single-stage detector under which the compared criteria report their results, so that the selection decision is isolated from the strength of the detector.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.20248
