Abstract
The IEEE BigData Cup benchmark combines three prediction problems with different output structures: ordinal suicide-risk classification, multi-label psychosocial factor detection, and extraction of supporting phrases. We introduce heterogeneous readout decomposition (HRD), which separates semantic verification from output realization. A locally deployed Qwen3.8-27B model, adapted with task-specific QLoRA adapters, produces both answer-token margins and layer-63 answer states for card-conditioned queries. HRD compares four latent scores for ordinal risk, retains token margins for most factors while routing seven labels through one shared latent probe, and constructs evidence sets from verbatim span candidates with calibrated, risk-conditional constraints. On two held-out user-grouped confirmation folds, the latent risk readout improves weighted F1 from 0.8237 to 0.8372 and macro F1 from 0.7965 to 0.8185. Selective factor routing improves macro F1 by 0.0105 and tail-label macro F1 by 0.0189; in contrast, global latent replacement and independent label-specific probes fail. The constrained evidence decoder raises pooled phrase F1 from 0.7488 to 0.7609 in row-level out-of-fold evaluation. Lenormand's best public result is 0.8052 on Subtask 1 and 0.6636 on Subtask 2, giving a composite score of 0.7627. These results identify the answer-token boundary, rather than semantic representation alone, as a measurable source of error in this benchmark.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.22767
