Abstract
Accurate preoperative subtype classification of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) from contrast-enhanced computed tomography remains clinically challenging. Radiomics provides structured tumour descriptors, whereas foundation representations offer transferable image features. However, it remains unclear whether radiomics still adds value beyond pretrained representations, and how 2D and 3D MedVAE encoders compare in this setting. We compared handcrafted radiomics, 2D MedVAE, 3D MedVAE, and their fusion for binary clear-cell RCC versus non-clear-cell RCC classification on KiTS23 under a unified preprocessing pipeline. Concatenation, cross-attention, and gated fusion were evaluated as representative integration strategies, and radiomics feature importance was analysed to support decision-centric interpretability. Fusion consistently improved discrimination over image-only MedVAE branches. The best overall performance was achieved by 3D gated fusion, with an AUC of 82.7\%, outperforming the best 2D fusion model (79.6%), the radiomics baseline (74.4%), and the single-modality MedVAE branches. Ablation analysis further showed clear gains of the full fusion model over both image-only and radiomics-only variants, indicating complementary contributions from radiomics and image representations. These findings suggest that radiomics remains relevant for RCC CT classification in the presence of foundation representations, and that its integration with MedVAE is more effective in the 3D setting. More broadly, the study supports a complementary role for radiomics and foundation representations in clinically meaningful imaging decision support.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.26463
