Paper Reading AI Learner

Latent Commonality Expectation-Maximisation for Box-supervised Tree Crown Instance Segmentation

2026-09-22 15:05:31
Thomas Pitts, Kunqi Li, Bin Liang

Abstract

Individual tree crown segmentation from aerial imagery underpins tree-level carbon accounting, biodiversity, and restoration monitoring at landscape scale. However, existing models are predominantly trained on dense canopy forest imagery and degrade in savannah and drylands, where tree crowns are sparse, of variable appearance, and underrepresented in annotated benchmarks. These models also typically depend on costly polygon annotations. We introduce LACE (LAtent Commonality Expectation-maximisation), a box-supervised instance segmentation model, evaluated on 0.1 m/px aerial RGB tree crown imagery. LACE uses a frozen DINOv3-web ViT-L/16 encoder, applied at four spatial offsets and interlaced into a denser feature grid, with a lightweight CenterNet-style detection head trained solely on bounding boxes. We use expectation-maximisation to separate recurring appearance, the "treeness", within bounding boxes from surroundings. On the OAM-TCD benchmark test set, LACE reaches a mask AP$_{50}$ of $0.663 \pm 0.001$ (3 seeds) trained on 900 box-annotated images and without mask annotations, above the 0.626 scored by Restor's released mask-supervised Mask R-CNN, which was trained on the full ~4.2k image set. On a sparse-canopy holdout set, mask AP$_{50}$ rises to $0.691$ versus $0.612$ for Detectree2, a mask-supervised baseline. On NeonTreeEvaluation, using the official evaluation code, LACE reaches $0.728 \pm 0.003$ F1@0.4 (5 seeds) from 23,424 hand-annotated RGB boxes alone, matching the authors' DeepForest model's published 0.719, using under 0.1% of its training annotations and none of its LiDAR-derived 30M-crown pretraining set. By leveraging frozen self-supervised features, LACE matches or surpasses fully-supervised specialist baselines from boxes alone, removing the need for polygon annotation in tree crown instance segmentation for sparse-canopy environments where labelled data is scarce.

Abstract (translated)

URL

https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.26549

PDF

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2609.26549.pdf


Tags
3D Action Action_Localization Action_Recognition Activity Adversarial Agent Attention Autonomous Bert Boundary_Detection Caption Chat Classification CNN Compressive_Sensing Contour Contrastive_Learning Deep_Learning Denoising Detection Dialog Diffusion Drone Dynamic_Memory_Network Edge_Detection Embedding Embodied Emotion Enhancement Face Face_Detection Face_Recognition Facial_Landmark Few-Shot Gait_Recognition GAN Gaze_Estimation Gesture Gradient_Descent Handwriting Human_Parsing Image_Caption Image_Classification Image_Compression Image_Enhancement Image_Generation Image_Matting Image_Retrieval Inference Inpainting Intelligent_Chip Knowledge Knowledge_Graph Language_Model LLM Matching Medical Memory_Networks Multi_Modal Multi_Task NAS NMT Object_Detection Object_Tracking OCR Ontology Optical_Character Optical_Flow Optimization Person_Re-identification Point_Cloud Portrait_Generation Pose Pose_Estimation Prediction QA Quantitative Quantitative_Finance Quantization Re-identification Recognition Recommendation Reconstruction Regularization Reinforcement_Learning Relation Relation_Extraction Represenation Represenation_Learning Restoration Review RNN Robot Salient Scene_Classification Scene_Generation Scene_Parsing Scene_Text Segmentation Self-Supervised Semantic_Instance_Segmentation Semantic_Segmentation Semi_Global Semi_Supervised Sence_graph Sentiment Sentiment_Classification Sketch SLAM Sparse Speech Speech_Recognition Style_Transfer Summarization Super_Resolution Surveillance Survey Text_Classification Text_Generation Time_Series Tracking Transfer_Learning Transformer Unsupervised Video_Caption Video_Classification Video_Indexing Video_Prediction Video_Retrieval Visual_Relation VQA Weakly_Supervised Zero-Shot