Abstract
White blood cells (WBCs) present on every Giemsa-stained thick blood smear share visual properties with early-stage Plasmodium falciparum ring-form trophozoites: small size, round morphology, and intense purple staining. They are a plausible but untested source of false positives in parasite-only detectors. We trained two YOLOv12s models on the Lacuna Malaria Detection dataset (8,000 images from Uganda and Ghana): Model A with parasite labels only, and Model B with both parasite and WBC labels. Seven independent spatial and statistical analyses tested whether false positive (FP) predictions cluster near WBC locations. All seven refute the hypothesis. In both models, 95% of FPs are pure background detections (IoU below 0.10 against any ground-truth box); zero are WBC class confusions. Ripley's Cross-K analysis shows spatial repulsion between FP centroids and WBC positions at every radius tested. Model B outperforms Model A overall (mAP50 0.859 vs. 0.755), and the advantage is uniform across all WBC-proximity bands, pointing to multi-task representation learning rather than WBC suppression as the cause. False positives arise from Giemsa stain debris and preparation artifacts. Effective mitigation requires staining artifact augmentation and annotation of unannotated early-stage ring forms rather than WBC labeling alone.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.29663
