Abstract
We present the first phoneme-level intelligibility evaluation of speech anonymizers, assessing the performance of ASR-ensemble-based metrics against measured intelligibility from a crowdsourced listening test. Our results show that simple hard-voting ASR metric reaches correlations above 0.9 with human ratings when aggregated by feature, test-type, or condition, provided that multiple ASR models are combined; evaluating stimuli with and without a carrier sentence further improves the correlation at the stimulus level. However, posterior-probability-based confidence metrics bring no gain, which can be traced back to the insufficient calibration of the state-of-the-art open ASR models that were utilized here. All data, code, and evaluation tools are released as open source.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.28577
