Abstract
Physical changes or sensing errors can invalidate embodied agents' task-relevant beliefs. AquaMend compares re-probing, rollback, and supported continuation on a probe-belief-action graph under an expected-loss objective covering sensing, physical recovery, and uncorrected failures. A joint posterior guides a one-step policy with conditional detection-power screening. The per-belief three-way optimum requires independence, separability, and fully resolving probes; the general policy has no global optimality guarantee. Across 32 paired scenarios in a self-constructed simulation benchmark, AquaMend recovers in 28/32 cases and reduces mean complete loss by 21.6% versus restart. Its paired loss difference from decision-theoretic troubleshooting (DTT) is not statistically significant after Holm correction. Against the all-candidate ablation, online decision time decreases by 12.3% overall but increases by 3.4% in the uncovered late stage.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.28973
