Abstract
Resource constraints make high-dimensional hyperspectral imaging challenging in autonomous perception, motivating the use of band selection methods. However, the sensitivity of band-selection methods to sampled data and their relationship to semantic segmentation models (SSMs) remain underexplored. This study evaluates six band selection methods on ten independently sampled, class-balanced region-of-interest (ROI) sets, yielding 60 top-25 band subsets from the Hyperspectral City V2 (128 bands: 450-950nm) dataset. Top-$K$ bands ($K\in\{3,5, ... 13\}$) from the first three ROI sets are evaluated with three SSMs against the corresponding 128-band baseline. Experiments show that intra-method stability is method-dependent: Sim-LP shows the highest stability (pairwise Jaccard similarity) and, together with JMIM+CSNR, yields the best segmentation results. Top-$K$ based SSMs remain competitive with baselines, with gains of up to 2.01 mIoU and 1.72 mF1 points, and 18-22x faster CPU inference for $K=9$. However, performance does not improve monotonically with $K$, and stability shows no consistent association with SSM performance. These findings suggest that intra-method stability is informative but an unreliable indicator of downstream segmentation performance, highlighting the need to evaluate band-selection methods across repeated samples, subset sizes, and SSMs.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.31074
