Abstract
Tactile information is essential for contact-rich manipulation tasks in robotics. Vision-based tactile sensors make it particularly easy to design end-to-end manipulation policies with tactile sensing, as they enable the use of existing encoders from computer vision. However, this has led to a huge variety of architectures, training datasets, and evaluation protocols, making it difficult to determine which design choices best encode touch. In this work, we address this gap and present a comprehensive study of tactile encoders and fusion strategies across various contact-rich manipulation tasks in real-world experiments. To enable a controlled comparison, we train and evaluate all models under the same pipeline and experimental setup, comprising more than 2000 real-world rollouts. Our results go beyond other studies that only compare simulation performance, which does not necessarily translate to real-world settings, where large-scale evaluations are needed to obtain reliable statistics. Our key finding is that there is no universally optimal representation or fusion strategy for encoding visual-tactile. Instead, the best encoder backbone and fusion scheme depend strongly on the task.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.30969
