Paper Reading AI Learner

Sparse2comm: Towards Robust Cooperative 3D Object Detection

2026-10-06 15:48:36
Lei Yang, Boqi Li, Chunmian Lin, Li Wang, Ziying Song, Shaoqing Xu, Heye Huang, Haibao Yu, Chen Lv

Abstract

Cooperative perception improves autonomous driving by sharing complementary observations among vehicles and roadside infrastructure for 3D object detection. However, practical deployment is constrained by limited bandwidth and unreliable cooperation, where packet loss, transmission delay, and spatial misalignment jointly degrade the cooperative feature stream. Existing methods often reduce communication cost or compensate for one degradation type, leaving coupled disturbances insufficiently addressed. To address this problem, we propose Sparse2comm, a bandwidth-efficient and robust cooperative 3D object detection framework that treats unreliable cooperation as progressive restoration over degraded cooperative features. Sparse Feature Encoding first encodes communication as randomly mask-sampled foreground features transmitted by collaborating agents, from which the ego vehicle reconstructs dense semantic representations. This sparse-to-dense mechanism learns to infer missing object-centric content from sparse observations, enabling ultra-low-bandwidth communication and packet-loss recovery within the same representation. On the semantically restored features, Latency-Aware Alignment predicts motion flow to compensate delayed messages, and Self-Calibrating Fusion estimates residual spatial offsets in a self-supervised manner before adaptive cross-agent fusion. Sparse2comm therefore restores semantic completeness, temporal consistency, and spatial alignment in an ordered pipeline. Extensive experiments on DAIR-V2X, OpenV2V, and V2V4Real show that Sparse2comm maintains competitive clean accuracy and consistently improves robustness under individual and mixed real-world degradations. Compared with the selective feature communication baseline Where2comm, Sparse2comm improves mixed-setting AP@0.5/AP@0.7 by +20.15/+11.79, +12.66/+11.07, and +15.36/+12.61 on the three datasets, respectively.

Abstract (translated)

URL

https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.08573

PDF

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2610.08573.pdf


Tags
3D Action Action_Localization Action_Recognition Activity Adversarial Agent Attention Autonomous Bert Boundary_Detection Caption Chat Classification CNN Compressive_Sensing Contour Contrastive_Learning Deep_Learning Denoising Detection Dialog Diffusion Drone Dynamic_Memory_Network Edge_Detection Embedding Embodied Emotion Enhancement Face Face_Detection Face_Recognition Facial_Landmark Few-Shot Gait_Recognition GAN Gaze_Estimation Gesture Gradient_Descent Handwriting Human_Parsing Image_Caption Image_Classification Image_Compression Image_Enhancement Image_Generation Image_Matting Image_Retrieval Inference Inpainting Intelligent_Chip Knowledge Knowledge_Graph Language_Model LLM Matching Medical Memory_Networks Multi_Modal Multi_Task NAS NMT Object_Detection Object_Tracking OCR Ontology Optical_Character Optical_Flow Optimization Person_Re-identification Point_Cloud Portrait_Generation Pose Pose_Estimation Prediction QA Quantitative Quantitative_Finance Quantization Re-identification Recognition Recommendation Reconstruction Regularization Reinforcement_Learning Relation Relation_Extraction Represenation Represenation_Learning Restoration Review RNN Robot Salient Scene_Classification Scene_Generation Scene_Parsing Scene_Text Segmentation Self-Supervised Semantic_Instance_Segmentation Semantic_Segmentation Semi_Global Semi_Supervised Sence_graph Sentiment Sentiment_Classification Sketch SLAM Sparse Speech Speech_Recognition Style_Transfer Summarization Super_Resolution Surveillance Survey Text_Classification Text_Generation Time_Series Tracking Transfer_Learning Transformer Unsupervised Video_Caption Video_Classification Video_Indexing Video_Prediction Video_Retrieval Visual_Relation VQA Weakly_Supervised Zero-Shot