Abstract
Holistic and semantics-aware co-speech gesture generation has advanced rapidly, yet evaluation remains behind: objective metrics do not consistently reflect human perception, and semantic appropriateness remains difficult to quantify. We present a perceptually grounded and semantics-aware benchmark that combines standardized model comparison, human-centered metric validation, and fine-grained semantic evaluation. We first curate a list of 13 objective metrics covering different aspects, including distributional similarity, geometric fidelity, kinematic quality, cross-modal synchrony, and semantic appropriateness. For the semantic-appropriateness category, we propose a new metric, Semantic Gesture Preservation (SGP), which measures how far semantic gestures in the ground truth are preserved in the generated gestures. For this, we augment the BEAT2 dataset's annotations using a multi-modal LLM. We then conduct a perceptual study where 101 participants score generated gestures among five dimensions, including human-likeness, motion diversity, absence of animation errors, speech timing and content match. We systematically analyze objective metric--subjective score correlations. Unlike Semantic Score (SC), which shows no significant association with the evaluated perceptual dimensions, SGP is selectively aligned with speech-aware human judgments. We construct five target-specific composite metrics aligned with the subjective dimensions. These composites improve perceptual alignment across all five dimensions, with the largest gains for absence of animation errors and content match, indicating that complementary objective signals can better approximate human judgments than individual metrics alone. Overall, our results show that objective metrics require validation against subjective evaluations.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.11669
