Abstract
Egocentric video and body-worn inertial sensors are increasingly recorded together, and the video is usually encoded by pretrained models. What these embeddings represent when the camera sits on the head, and how they should be combined with inertial sensing, has received little attention. Across VideoMAEv2, CLIP, DINOv2 and the egocentric VC-1, the leading principal directions of the embedding are dominated by where the camera looks. Measured head orientation explains them on Ego-Exo4D for egocentric (R^2 0.49-0.70) but not exocentric cameras, and the scene layout explains them on WEAR. The part that the limbs' inertial signals predict separates activities across people. In a set-level probe, the rest separates exercise sets within a participant but not activities across people. This is consistent with separate roles: the video finds the clips of the same set, and the inertial classifier labels them. On WEAR, with temporal order removed and one random limb per one-second clip, we propagate inertial predictions over a within-participant video graph whose leading components are removed. This raises subject-wise cross-validated macro-F1 from 0.648 to 0.852. In our comparisons, propagation helps only over the video graph, and fusing the modalities in one classifier, or adding inertial edges to the graph, performs worse.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.12926
