Abstract
Recent advances in speech synthesis technology have enabled the generation of speech with diverse characteristics. One such characteristic is a foreign accent. In our preliminary experiments, we found that UTMOS, a widely used automatic speech quality assessment system, tended to assign lower scores to speech with stronger foreign accents, even though it is produced by a human speaker. This observation raised a question: How do humans evaluate the naturalness of foreign-accented speech? We conducted a large-scale subjective evaluation involving both native and non-native listeners under different evaluation instructions. The results showed that humans also considered accentedness when evaluating naturalness, but that defining naturalness in terms of human-likeness and selecting raters who have greater exposure to the target accent may enable more appropriate evaluation. This study aims to provide a starting point for future discussions on fairer and more appropriate evaluation of synthetic speech with a foreign accent.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.13175
