Abstract
Real-world audio recordings for deepfake detection rarely consist solely of speech; they often are mixtures of speech and background events that themselves may also be synthetic. When processing these mixtures, it remains unclear whether detectors attend to the speech or the background event, and where their spectral evidence lies. We study this on the CompSpoof V2 database, whose mixtures pair independently real-or-fake speech and event components. Our results show that all systems detect fake events more accurately than fake speech. However, this performance gap is largely driven by poor generalization to an unseen fake speech domain, rather than a true difference in difficulty. Furthermore, sub-band probing reveals that the front-end encoder dictates where a countermeasure focuses its frequency evidence. To enable reliable deployment in real-world scenarios, future countermeasures should address out-of-domain generalization failures and carefully select front-end encoders aligned with their target acoustic evidence. Our source code and checkpoints are released at this https URL.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.17617
